2015, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Elec Psic Izt 2015; 18 (4)
Some dimensions of sexual experimentation: a sex based comparison
Pulido RMA, Gayoso LJL, Pérez CCV, Ruiz RM
Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1690-1705
PDF size: 471.31 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research was to assess gender
differences regarding some dimensions of sexual
experimentation. A sample of 306 students from a private
university from Mexico City participated in the study. The
sample consisted of 135 men and 161women, their age
ranged from 18 to 28 years. The SESU questionnaire was
used to collect the data. The instrument assessed the
following sexual behaviors: masturbation, pornography,
casual sex, orgasm, sex communication and intercourse.
Results showed that the most sex behaviors assessed in the
study were more frequent in male participants. Results were
discussed in terms of their similarities with the research
literature on the subject, and in terms of the construct´s
limitations.
REFERENCES
Barash, D. y Lipton, J. (2001). The myth of monogamy. New York: Freeman.
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., y Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.
Carpenter, D., Jenssen, E. Gram., C., Vorts, H. y Wicherts, J. (2008). Woman´s scores on the sexual inhibition/sexual excitation scales (SIS/SES): gender similarities and differences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 1, 36-48
Caycedo, C., Cubides, I., Martín, A., Cortés, O., Berman, S., Oviedo, A. y Suárez, I. (2007). Relación entre el género y las experiencias de cortejo y actitudes hacia las relaciones románticas. Psicología desde el Caribe,20, 76-92.
De Graff, H, y Sanford, T. (2004). Gender differences in affective responses to sexual rejection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 395-403.
Fischtein, D., Herold, E. y Desmarais, S. (2007). How much does gender explain in sexual attitudes and behaviors? A survey of Canadian adults, Archives of Sexual Behavior 36, 451–461.
Gerressu, M., Mercer, C., Graham C., Wellings, K.,y Johnson, A. (2008). Prevalence of masturbation and associated factors in a British national probability survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 266–278.
Greene, K., y Faulkner, S. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53, 239- 251.
Holmberg, D. y Blair, K. (2009). Sexual desire, communication, satisfaction, and preferences of men and women in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 57–66.
Janssen, E., Carpenter, D., y Graham, C. A. (2003). Selecting films for sex research: Gender differences in erotic film preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 243–251.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. y Martin, C.E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Indiana, Indiana University Press.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. y Martin, C.E. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Indiana, Indiana University Press
Kontula, O. y Haavio-Mannila, E. (2002). Masturbation in a generational perspective. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 14, 49–83.
Lewis, M., Lee, C., Patrick, M. y Fossos, N. (2007). Gender-specific normative misperceptions of risky sexual behavior and alcohol-related risky sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 57, 81-90.
Lykins, A., Meana, M. y Strauss, G. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 219–228.
Moral, J. y Ortega, M. (2008). Diferencias de género en significados, actitudes y conductas asociados a la sexualidad en estudiantes universitarios. Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, 14, 28, 97-119.
Marks, M. y Fraley, C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175-186.
Milhausen, R. y Herols, E. (2001). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 13, 63-83.
Nunally, J.C. (1991). Teoría psicométrica. México, McGraw-Hill.
Rupp, H. y Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: A Review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 206–218
Sanders, S., Graham, C. y Milhausen, R. (2008). Predicting sexual problems in women: Relevance of sexual inhibition and sexual excitation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 241-251.