2000, Number 2
Next >>
Vet Mex 2000; 31 (2)
Evaluation of three vaccination programs in high plateau poultry farms by antibodies detection and protection against the challenge of infectious bronchitis virus in broilers
Galindo MF, Escorcia M, Petrone VM, Fehervari T, Quintana LJA, Téllez IG
Language: English/Spanish
References: 30
Page: 83-88
PDF size: 52.32 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Seroconversion as the vaccination response and the protection to the challenge against infectious bronchitis virus was determined in thirty Peterson χ Avian Farm broilers, both sexes which were vaccinated on one-day old chicken and three groups were formed (Groups A, B y C). Animals were revaccinated at 23 days (Group C) with an attenuated vaccine, and antibody titers were obtained by the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) indirect technique three weeks after prime vaccination. Chicken thereafter, were exposed to a challenge with the Massachusetts 41 virus strain as a potency test. Thirty broilers served as the non vaccinated control Group. Results of the virus isolation indicated that broilers vaccinated at one-day old, with half a dose, via spray and revaccinate at age 23 days old with the complete dose in the drinking water (Group C) presented an 100% protection. Another Group (B) vaccinated at one-day of age with only a half dose in the drinking water, presented an 82%. This protection can be considered to be satisfactory. A third Group (A) was vaccinated at one-day old with half dose by thin drop spray, and presented only an 8.2%, considered to be as not satisfactory. The geometric mean (TGM) value of ELISA antibodies in groups B and C did not show relation with the protection against the challenge. Results suggest that the vaccination procedure in group A was not effective and did not provide protection against infectious bronchitis virus challenge performed at six weeks old.
REFERENCES
1. Avellaneda G. Estructura del virus de bronquitis infecciosa. Avic Prof 1992;10:38-40.
2. Soto PE. Situación actual de la bronquitis infecciosa en México. Memorias del VIII Curso de Actualización Avi-Mex Bronquitis Infecciosa y Problemas Respiratorios Emergentes; 1996 julio 26; México (df). México (df): Laboratorio Avi-Mex, S.A. de C.V., 1996:6-13.
3. Lucio MB. El virus de la bronquitis infecciosa y sus variantes. Memorias de la XXII Convención Anual de la Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas; 1997 mayo 7-11; Ixtapa-Zihuatanejo (Guerrero) México. México (DF): Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas, A.C., 1997:316-322.
4. Moreno ChR. Bronquitis infecciosa de las aves. Inf Cient Tecnol 1994;1:9-16.
5. King DJA, Cavanagh D. Bronquitis infecciosa. En: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, Reid WM, Yoder HW, editores. Enfermedades de las aves. México (DF): El Manual Moderno, 1995:575-591.
6. McMartin DA. Infectious bronchitis In: McFerran JB, McNulty MS, editors. Virus infections of birds. Amsterdam, The Netherland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993:249-275.
7. López S, Canovas A, Viamontes O, Núñez L. Valoración de los esquemas más adecuados de la vacunación contra el Newcastle y la bronquitis infecciosa en pollos de engorde. Rev Cub Cienc Avíc 1991;8:62-70.
8. Lucio DE. Calendarios de vacunación y monitoreo en el pollo de engorda y gallina de postura. Memorias del Curso de Actualización Sobre Técnicas de Vacunación y Reacciones Posvacunales; 1996 noviembre 29; México (DF). México (df): Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas, A.C., 1996:47-52.
9. Butcher DG, Miles DR. Vaccination failure: factors to consider. Poultry Dig 1993;52:22-26.
10. Quiroz MA, Retana A, Tamayo M. Determinación de la presencia del serotipo Arkansas a partir de aislamientos del virus de bronquitis infeciosa aviar en México. Memorias de la IV Jornada Médico Avícola; 1993 agosto 4-6; México (df). México (DF): Departamento de Producción Animal: Aves-División de Educación Continua de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1993:191-198.
11. Cook JKA. Actualidades sobre la bronquitis infecciosa: problemas respiratorios en las aves. Intervet 1996;1:1-10.
12. Villegas P, Avellaneda G. Interpretación de resultados serológicos en bronquitis infecciosa. Avic Prof 1992;10:8-12.
13. Dufour L, McCarty J. Uso correcto de la serología en pollos de engorde para el control y diagnóstico de enfermedades. Avic Prof 1993;11:30-32.
14. The Office of the Federal Register. National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration. Code of federal regulations. Animals and animal products. Washington (DC): Federal Register National Archives, 1975;9:284-286.
15. Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories. Profile (computer program) version 2.1. The KPL diagnostic system manual. Bangkok (Thailand): Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories, 1993.
16. Winterfield RW, Fadly AM, Hanley JE. Characteristic of an isolate of infectious bronchitis virus from chickens in Florida. Avian Dis 1971;15:305-311.
17. Gelb J. Infectious bronchitis. In: Graham H, Lawrence H, Charles H, James EP, editors. Isolation and identification of avian pathogens. Mississippi (MS): American Association of Avian Pathologists, 1989:124-127.
18. Darbyshire JH, Peters RW. Humoral antibody response and assessment of protection following primary vaccination of chicks with maternally derived antibody against avian infectious bronchitis virus. Res Vet Sci 1985;38:14-21.
19. McDonald JW, Dagless MD, Martin DA, Randall CJ, Patisson M, Early JL, et al. Field observations on serological responses to vaccine strains of infectious bronchitis virus administered by coarse spray and via the drinking water. Avian Pathol 1982;11:537-546.
20. Toro H, Hidalgo H, Collingwood-Selby AN. Lachrymal antibody response of specific pathogen free chickens and chickens with maternal immunity after infectious bronchitis virus vaccination. Prev Vet Med 1994;18:267-274.
21. Toro H, Reyes E, Redmann T, Kaleta EF. Local and systemic specific antibody response of different chicken lines after ocular vaccination against infectious bronchitis. J Vet Med B 1996;43:449-454.
22. Da Silva MNR, Mockett APA, Barret ADT, Cook KAJ. IgM responses in chicken serum to live and inactivated infectious bronchitis virus vaccines. Avian Dis 1991;35:470-475.
23. Dufour L. Influencia de las reproductoras sobre las reacciones vacunales de la progenie. Avic Prof 1992;10:44-45.
24. Gómez DCA. Medición de la inmunidad. Memorias de la IV Jornada Médico Avícola; 1993 agosto 4-6; México (DF). México (DF): Departamento de Producción Animal: Aves-División de Educación Continua de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1993:79-88.
25. Davelaar FG, Kouwenhoven B. Vaccination of 1-day-old broilers against infectious bronchitis by eye drop application or coarse droplet spray and the effect of revaccination by spray. Avian Pathol 1980;9:499-510.
26. Darbyshire HJ, Peters WR. Sequential development of humoral immunity and assessment of protection in chickens following vaccination and challenge with avian infectious bronchitis virus. Res Vet Sci 1984;37:77-86.
27. Andrade LF, Villegas P, Fletcher OJ. Vaccination of day-old broilers against infectious bronchitis: effect of vaccine strain and route of administration. Avian Dis 1982;27:178-187.
28. Salado CR. Manejo y aplicación de vacunas por aspersión y por punción en el ala y sus reacciones posvacunales. Memorias del Curso de Actualización Sobre Técnicas de Vacunación y Reacciones Posvacunales; 1996 noviembre 29; México (df). México (DF): Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas, A.C., 1996:23-28.
29. Lucio MB. Respuesta inmune al virus de la bronquitis infecciosa: protección y serología. Memorias de la XVIII Convención Anual de la Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas; 1993 mayo 55-59; Cancún (Quintana Roo) México. México (DF): Asociación Nacional de Especialistas en Ciencias Avícolas, A.C., 1993:132-137.
30. Kusters JG, Niesters HGM, Bleumink-Pluym NMC, Davelaar FG Horzinek MC, Van der Zeijst BAM. Molecular epidemiology of infectious bronchitis virus in the Netherlands. J Virol 1987;68:343-352.