Rosell LY, Senso RJA, Leiva MAA

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page:
PDF size: 634.51 Kb.

ABSTRACT

An ontology is a useful tool to deal with the heterogeneity of data and their semantization, with a view to raising the quality of processes of organization, search and retrieval of information in institutional management systems, particularly those implemented in a university web. In view of the wealth of multidisciplinary knowledge treasured by the Universities, a UH Ontology is proposed for the management of data. The paper describes the characteristics and conditions of the heterogeneous data currently managed by various information management systems at the Universities, and proposes a methodological framework for the design of an ontology for the management of heterogeneous data at the institution. The proposal includes the design of the ontology, its classes, annotations, ontological languages and semantic annotation scheme, based on the methodology developed by Noy and McGuinness and the software Protégé as a construction tool.

REFERENCES

1. Noy NF, McGuinness DL. Desarrollo de Ontologías-101: guía para crear tu primera ontología. 2005 [citado 16 de agosto de 2016]. Disponible en: http://protege.stanford. edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-es.pdf

2. Lozano-Tello A, Gómez-Pérez A, Sosa E. Selection of ontologies for the semantic Web. In: Lovelle JMC, Rodríguez BMG, Aguilar LJ, Gayo JEL, Ruiz MDP (eds.). Web Engineering, Proceedings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin. 2003.

3. Gruber T. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Technical Report KSL-93-04.CA: Knowledge Systems Laboratory Stanford University; 1993.

4. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition. 1993;5:199-220.

5. Studer R, Benjamins R, Fensel D. Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering. 1998;25:161-97.

6. Antoniou G, Franconi E, Van Harmelen F. Introduction to semantic web ontology languages. Reasoning web. Springer; 2005.

7. Universidad de La Habana. Intranet de la Universidad de La Habana. La Habana: Producciones IRIS. 2010 [citado 18 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://intranet.uh.cu/universidad-de-la-habana/mision-vision-y-objetivos

8. Solomou G, Papatheodorou T. The use of SKOS vocabularies in digital repositories: the DSpace case. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: IEEE Fourth International Conference; 2010.

9. Brickley D, Miller L. FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. 2010 [citado 18 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec.

10. Dimi Surla B, Segedinac M, Ivanović D. A BIBO ontology extension for evaluation of scientific research results. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Balkan Conference in Informatics; 2012:275-8.

11. Corson-Rikert J. BIBO 1.3 Ontology overview diagram. Universidad de La Habana; 2016.

12. Florez Fernández HA. Construcción de ontologías OWL. Vínculos. 2013;4:19-34.

13. Horridge M, Knublauch H, Rector A, Stevens R, Wroe C. A Practical Guide to building OWL ontologies using The Protégé-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools Edition 1.0. University of Manchester; 2004.

14. W3C. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System. 2012 [citado 10 de diciembre de 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/

15. D'Arcus B, Giasson F. Bibliographic Ontology Specification. Madrid: Biblioteca Nacional Española; 2009.

16. Cornell UD. VIVO: ISF. 2009 [citado 17 de septiembre de 2015]. Disponible en: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/VIVO/VIVO-ISF+Ontology

17. Corson-Rikert J, Mitchell S, Lowe B, Rejack N, Ding Y, Guo C. The VIVO ontology. Synthesis Lectures on Semantic Web: Theory and Technology; 2012.

18. Larin-Fonseca R, Garea-Llano E. Automatic Generation of the DataRepresentation Ontology for Semantic Integration of Heterogeneous Geographical Data. VII Congreso Internacional Geomática; 2011.

19. Navarro Galindo JL. FLERSA: un sistema semántico de gestión de contenido web (S-CMS). [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Granada. 2012.