medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2016, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2016; 27 (4)

Procedural framework to facilitate interoperability in the context of the Virtual Health Library of Cuba: the Ontomed model

Rodríguez PK, Leyva MAA, Senso RJA

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page:
PDF size: 434.64 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The absence of a linked data model in the context of the Virtual Health Library of Cuba (VHL) causes deficiencies in the semantic interoperability of content and information retrieval. In addition, as added problem, the documentary component entities have different levels of bibliographic description and subject scope. This article proposes the design of a procedural framework to facilitate semantic interoperability between linked datasets of VHL, standardizing their core classes and properties. Such a procedure, implemented in the ontological model called Ontomed, is a theoretical and conceptual approach that allows modeling the main entities, attributes and relationships in the context of the VHL. A direct impact will expect on three key dimensions: 1) characterization of context implementing the procedural framework 2) formalization of the components of the ontological model and 3) selecting an experimental sample on the stage of the VHL.


REFERENCES

  1. Doerr M, Gradmann S, Hennicke S, Isaac A, Meghini C, van de Sompel H. The europeana data model. In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly; 2010. pp. 10-5.

  2. Miller E, Ogbuji U, Mueller V, MacDougall K. BIBFRAME Primer: Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services. Library of Congress; 2012:[42 p.].

  3. Rovira Jarque A, Bonsón À. Les noves normes per a un catàleg. RDA: Documento; 2015.

  4. Packer AL, de Castro E. Biblioteca Virtual en Salud: BIREME. Sao Paulo: El Centro; 1998.

  5. Santana-Arroyo S. Comparación de campos de LILACS Descripción Bibliográfica e Indización (LILDBI) con entidades y atributos de los requerimientos funcionales para registros bibliográficos. Rev Esp Docum Cient. 2013;36(2):6.

  6. García R, Alejandro A. Los objetos bibliográficos confirmados en la integración compleja de la descripción y acceso a recursos. Investig Bibliotecol. 2009;23(48):33-59.

  7. Wilson P. Svenonius E. The Intellectual Foundations of Information Organization. Cambridge: Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing; 2001;62(2):203-4.

  8. Le Boeuf P. Principios de catalogación IFLA: Hacia un código internacional de catalogación; 2005:2.

  9. Andreu S, Miquel C, Jorge F, Jesús G. Aplicación del modelo de datos RDF en las colecciones digitales de bibliotecas, archivos y museos de España. Rev Esp Docum Cient. 2016;39(1):5.

  10. Miller E, Ogbuji U, Mueller V, MacDougall K. Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services. Washington, DC: Library of Congress; 2012 [citado 20 de mayo de 2013]. Disponible en: http://www. loc. gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf

  11. Doerr M, LeBoeuf P. Modelling intellectual processes: the FRBR-CRM harmonization. Digital libraries: Research and development: Springer; 2007. p. 114-23.

  12. Bodenreider O. The unified medical language system: integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic acids research. 2004;32:267-70.

  13. Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T. Linked data-the story so far. Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts. 2009:205-27.

  14. Monino JL, Sedkaoui S. Big Data, Open Data and Data Development: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

  15. Solar M, Meijueiro L, Daniels F. A Guide to Implement Open Data in Public Agencies. Springer; 2013. p. 75-86.

  16. Delgado YH, Álvarez LR, Mederos AL, García MdMR, Montes JFA. BM2LOD: platform for publishing bibliographic data as linked open data. 7th IADIS International Conference Information Systems; 2014.

  17. Verborgh R, De Wilde M, Sawant A. Using OpenRefine: the essential OpenRefine guide that takes you from data analysis and error fixing to linking your dataset to the Web; 2013.

  18. Lagoze C, Van de Sompel H, Johnston P, Nelson M, Sanderson R, Warner S. Open archives initiative object reuse and exchange. Presentation at JCDL; 2007.

  19. Miles A, Matthews B, Wilson M, Brickley D, editors. SKOS core: simple knowledge organisation for the web. International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. 2005. pp. 3.

  20. Dimic Surla B, Segedinac M, Ivanovic D, editors. A BIBO ontology extension for evaluation of scientific research results. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Balkan Conference in Informatics. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM); 2012. pp. 275-8.

  21. Brickley D, Miller L. FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. Namespace document. 2012:9.

  22. Krafft DB, Cappadona NA, Caruso B, Corson-Rikert J, Devare M, Lowe BJ, et al. Vivo: Enabling national networking of scientists. 2010.

  23. Weibel SL, Koch T. The Dublin core metadata initiative. D-lib magazine. 2000;6(12):1082-9873.

  24. Cox SJD, Yu J, Rankine T. SISSVoc: A Linked Data API for access to SKOS vocabularies. Semantic Web. 2016;7(1):9-24.

  25. Schaerf A. Reasoning with individuals in concept languages. Data & Knowledge Engineering Data & Knowledge Engineering. 1994;13(2):141-76.

  26. Xu J, Shironoshita P, Visser U, John N, Kabuka M. Module Extraction for Efficient Object Queries over Ontologies with Large ABoxes. AIA Artificial Intelligence and Applications. 2015;2015(1):8-31.

  27. Villazón-Terrazas BM. A method for reusing and re-engineering non-ontological resources for building ontologies: IOS Press; 2012.

  28. Baader F. The description logic handbook theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

  29. Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A, Juristo N. Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; 1997.

  30. Van Hooland S, De Wilde M, Verborgh R, Steiner T, Van de Walle R. Exploring entity recognition and disambiguation for cultural heritage collections. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 2015;30(2):262-79.

  31. Portal Europeana. Modelo de datos Europeana; 2015 [citado 20 de mayo de 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.europeana.eu/portal/

  32. Library of Congress. Digital public library of America. 2015 [citado 20 de mayo de 2016]. Disponible en: https://www.dp.la/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com