medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2016, Number 2

<< Back

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2016; 18 (2)

Bond Strength Assessment Between Acrylic Teeth and Acrylic Resin Repairs: Effect of Different Surface Treatments

Muñoz MT, Ruales E, Prates LHM, Volpato CAM

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 109-124
PDF size: 2440.44 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength between acrylic resin teeth and autopolymerizing acrylic resin repairs after different surface treatments. Seventy-two upper anterior acrylic resin denture teeth (MFT, Vita, Germany) were selected. Specimens were randomly assigned into six groups (n=12): G1-C, without surface treatment (control); G2-M, methylmetacrylate monomer (Jet, Clássico, Brazil) application; G3-A treatment with methylmetacrylate and metiletilcetone-based bonding agent (Vitacoll, Vita, Germany). The surface of G4-OA, G5-OAM and G6-OAA was airborne-particle abraded with aluminum oxide (Polidental, Wilson, Brazil); being repeated the treatments respectively of groups G1-C, G2-M e G3-A. All groups were then repaired with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Jet, Clássico, Brazil). Shear bond strength test was performed using an universal testing machine (Instron 4444). Two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s analysis (p‹0,05) were used for statistical comparison. The shear bond strengths of groups G4-OA, G5-OAM and G6-OAA were significantly higher (p‹0,05) than that of groups G1-C, G2-M and G3-A. The shear bond strength of Group G3-A were significantly higher (p‹0,05) than that of groups G1-C and G2-M. In conclution, chemical treatments in combination with bondig agents showed significant improvements in bond strength without aluminum oxide treatment. More significantly, surface treatment with aluminum oxide particles resulted in the highest bond strength values for acrylic resin teeth repaired with autopolymerizing acrylic resin.


REFERENCES

  1. Van Noort R. Introdução aos Materiais Dentários. Brasil: Editorial Artmed; 2004.

  2. Peyton FA, Craig RG. History of resin in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 1975; 19 (2): 211-222.

  3. Vallitttu P. K. Interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) in dental polymers and composites. J. Adh Sci & Tech. 2009; 23 (7- 8): 961-972.

  4. Keh E. S., Hayakawa I., Takahashi H., Watanabe A., Iwasaki Y., Akiyoshi K., Nakabayashi N. Improving a self-curing dental resin by eliminating oxygen, hydroquinone and water from its curing process. Dent Mat J. 2002: 21 (4); 373-382.

  5. Anusavice K. J. Shen C., Rawls H. R. Phillips' science of dental materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.

  6. Rached R. N., Powers J. M., Del Bel Cury A. A. Efficacy of conventional and experimental techniques for denture repair. J. Oral Reabil. 2004: 31(11); 1130-1138.

  7. Beyli M. S., Von Fraunhofer J. A. An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin dentures. J. Prosthet Dent. 1981:46 (3); 238-241.

  8. Vallittu P. K. Bonding of resin teeth to the polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. Acta Odont Scand. 1995: 53 (2); 99-104.

  9. Darbar U. R., Huggett R., Harrison A. Denture fracture--a survey. Brit Dent J. 1994:176 (9); 342-345.

  10. Consani R. L. X., Richter M. M., Mesquita M. F., Sinhoreti M. A. C., Guiraldo R. D. Effect of aluminium oxide particle sandblasting on the artificial tooth–resin bond. J. Invest & Clin Dent. 2010: 1 (2); 144-150.

  11. Ng E. T. L., Tan L. H. H., Chew B. S. H., Thean HPY. Shear bond strength of microwaveable acrylic resin for denture repair. J. Oral Reabil. 2004: 31(8); 798-802.

  12. Alkurt M., Duymuş Z. Y., Gundogdu M. Effect of repair resin type and surface treatment on the repair strength of heatpolymerized denture base resin. J. Prosthet Dent. 2014:111 (1); 71-78.

  13. Fawzy A. S., El-Askary F. S., Amer M. A. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J. Dent. 2008: 36 (12); 969-976.

  14. El-Sheikh M. M., Powers J. M. Tensile bond strength of porcelain teeth to denture resin before and after aging. Int. J. Prosthod. 1998: 11 (1).

  15. Chung K. H., Chung C. Y., Chan D. C.N. Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base. J. Oral Rehabil. 2008: 35 (4); 268-275.

  16. Bragaglia L. E., Prates L. H. M., Calvo M. C. M. The role of surface treatments on the bond between acrylic denture base and teeth. Braz Dent J. 2009: 20 (2); 156-161.

  17. Akin H., Kirmali O., Tugut F., Coskun M. E. Effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to polymethylmethacrylate denture base material. Photomed laser surgery. 2014: 32 (9); 512-516.

  18. Minami H., Suzuki S., Minesaki Y., Kurashige H., Tanaka T. In vitro evaluation of the influence of repairing condition of denture base resin on the bonding of autopolymerizing resins. J. Prosthet Dent. 2004: 91 (2); 164-170.

  19. Thunyakitpisal N., Thunyakitpisal P., Wiwatwarapan C. The effect of chemical surface treatments on the flexural strength of repaired acrylic denture base resin. J. Prosthod. 2011: 20 (3); 195-199.

  20. Sarac Y. S., Sarac D., Kulunk T., Kulunk S. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J. Prothet Dent. 2005: 94 (3); 259-266.

  21. Colvenkar S. S., Aras M. A. In vitro evaluation of transverse strength of repaired heat cured denture base resins with and without surface chemical treatment. J. Indian Prosthod Soc. 2008: 8 (2); 87.

  22. Takahashi Y., Chai J., Takahashi T., Habu T. Bond strength of denture teeth to denture base resins. Int. J. Prosthod. 2000: 13 (1).

  23. Marra J., Paleari A. G., Pero A. C., de Souza R. F., Barbosa D. B., Compagnoni M. A. Effect of methyl methacrylate monomer on bond strength of denture base resin to acrylic teeth. Int. J. Adhes. 2009: 29 (4); 391-395.

  24. Korkmaz T., Dogan A., Dogan O. M., Demir H. The bond strength of a highly cross-linked denture tooth to denture base polymers: a comparative study. J. Adhes Dent. 201113 (1).

  25. Rached R. N., Powers J. M., Cury A. A. D B. Repair strength of autopolymerizing, microwave, and conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resins. J. Prosthet Dent. 2004: 92 (1); 79-82.

  26. Özcan M. Surface Conditioning Protocol for the Chairside Repair of Polymeric Denture Teeth. J. Adhes Dent 2015: 17 (1); 90 -90.

  27. Morrow R. M., Matvias F. M., Windeler A. S., Fuchs R. J. Bonding of plastic teeth to two heat-curing denture base resins. J. Prosthod Dent. 1978: 39 (5), 565-568.

  28. Cunningham J. L., Benington I. C. An investigation of the variables which may affect the bond between plastic teeth and denture base resin. J. Dent. 1999: 27 (2); 129-135.

  29. Consani R. L., Naoe H. T., Mesquita M. F., Sinhoreti M. A., Mendes W. B. Effect of ridgelap surface treatments on the bond of resin teeth to denture base. J. Adhes Dent. 2011:13 (3); 287.

  30. Geerts G. A., Jooste C. H. A comparison of the bond strengths of microwave-and water bath-cured denture material. J. Prosthet Dent. 1993:70 (5); 406-409. Attribution




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com