medigraphic.com
ISSN 2070-8718 (Print)

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Gen 2015; 9 (2)

Characterization of birth defects according to the ultrasonographic and pathological diagnosis. Hospital “Ramón González Coro”

Ramírez PI, Jova MR

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 24-29
PDF size: 516.00 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Our aim was to characterize congenital malformations identified through prenatal ultrasound and pathological examination. A descriptive and cross-sectional study carried out in the Ramón González Coro hospital during the period 2008 - 2012. Ultrasound and autopsy findings were related. The products were predominantly male, of mothers aged between 20 and 34 years old and death occurred before the 26 weeks of gestational age. The most affected anatomical systems causing major birth defects were: cerebrospinal, chromosomal and musculoskeletal systems. There was a suitable level of prenatal diagnosis. The autopsy was the best tool for the definitive diagnosis of congenital malformations.


REFERENCES

  1. Sociedad Española de Obstetricia y Ginecología (SEGO). Protocolos asistenciales en Obstetricia. Screening de cromosomopatías fetales; 2004. Disponible en: http://www.sego.es/.

  2. Anomalías congénitas. Nota descriptiva N°370. OMS. Disponible en: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs370/es/2010/ index.html (fecha de acceso: enero de 2013).

  3. Romero A et al. Anomalías congénitas. Codificación en CIE-9-MC. 10ma edición. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. 2010. p7-12.

  4. Marcheco B. La ultrasonografía y su valor para el diagnóstico prenatal. Rev Cubana Genet Comunit. 2010;4(2):3-4

  5. MINSAP. Dirección Nacional de Estadísticas. Anuario Estadístico del MINSAP, 2014. La Habana Cuba [en línea] URL Disponible en: http:///bvs.sld.cu/cgi-bin/wxis/anuario.

  6. Lomax L, Johansson H, Valentin L, Sladkevicius P. Agreement between prenatal ultrasonography and fetal autopsy findings: a retrospective study of second trimester terminations of pregnancy. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33(7):31-7.

  7. Pauli RM. Stillbirth fetal disorders. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53 (3): 646-655.

  8. Wapner RJ. Genetics of stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53 (3): 628-634.

  9. Reefhuis J, Honein MA. Maternal age and non-chromosomal birth defects, Atlanta–1968–2000: teenager or thirtysomething, who is at risk? 2005; Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 70: 572–579

  10. Herkrath AP, Herkrath FJ, Rebelo MA, Vettore MV. Parental age as a risk factor for non-syndromic oral clefts: a metaanalysis 2012; J Dent 40: 3-14.

  11. Sunethri p, Ramakrishna D, Jijiya B, Ramana PV. Pattern of distribution of congenital anomalies in stillborn: a hospital based prospective study. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences 2011; 2 (1): 604-10.

  12. Zhraa T. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Congenital Anomalies in Mosul City. The Iraqi postgraduate medical journal; 2012 11 (4): 223-9.

  13. Tennant P, Raza T, Bythell M, Rankin J. Maternal age and the risk of structural congenital anomalies. Arch Dis Child Foetal Neonatal 9Ed 2010; 10: 1136.

  14. Ooki S. Maternal age and birth defects after the use of assisted reproductive technology in Japan, 2004–2010. 2013;5: 65–77.

  15. Luo Y ET al. Maternal Age, Parity and Isolated Birth Defects: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Shenzhen, China. 2013; 12 (5) 29-36

  16. Miller A, Riehle-Colarusso T, Siffel C, Frias JL, Correa A. Maternal age and prevalence of isolated congenital heart defects in an urban area of the United States 2011; Am J Med Genet, 155: 2137–2145.

  17. Rivera VM, Llanusa C, Sánchez R, Carrillo L, Rodríguez L, Nodarse A, et al. Comparación entre el diagnóstico prenatal y anatomopatológico de las anomalías congénitas. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol (periódica en línea). 2007; 33 (1). Disponible en:http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138600X2007000100003&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Acceso: 12 septiembre 2012.

  18. Hossein A, Mohammad HK, Farzaneh A, Saeed D. Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies: A Community-Based Study in the Northwest of Iran.2014; 25 (9) 15-26

  19. Dimosthenis Miliaras, Soultana Meditskou and Maria Ketikidou. Increased male proportion in foetal deaths and in foetuses with congenital malformations in Greece Human Reproduction 2008; 23(10): 2385–2389.

  20. Oliveira CI, Costa AR, Ferrarese VCC, Mozvaz DC, Fett-conte AC. Birth defects in newborns and stillborns: An example of the Brazilian reality. BMC Notes 2011; 4: 343.

  21. Pereda H, Delgado F, Morejón M, Pérez Y, Hernández L Fernández. Comportamiento de los defectos congénitos en San Luis Rev Ciencias Médicas 2012; 16 (4):9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com