2016, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
AbanicoVet 2016; 6 (1)
Bacterial study in uterus from slaughtered cows at the municipal slaughterhouse in Tulancingo, Hidalgo
Espinoza-Santillán D, Martínez-Juárez V, Peralta-Ortiz J, Molina- Mendoza P, Olave-Leyva J, Ávila-Castillo R
Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 22-28
PDF size: 64.43 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and identification of bacterial microorganisms in uterus from slaughtered cows. Thirty-two samples of uterine lavage were obtained, these samples were used to inoculate blood agar and McConkey agar culture media, subsequently these underwent Gram staining for classification in Gram- positive and Gram-negative. A Catalase test, besides a mannitol salt agar culture and coagulase, were performed to the Gram-positive bacteria, while to the Gram-negative bacteria, the IMViC tests were performed. 100% of the samples showed bacterial isolation; from these, 40.62% were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (SCN), likely epidermis species, representing the highest frequency of bacterial isolates (P ‹0.05). Among the Gram-negative isolates Salmonella spp. prevailed with 15.62% and 12.5% for Escherichia coli. The results demonstrate that, in the uterus from slaughtered cows at the slaughterhouse, bacterial organisms, live as part of normal microbiota of the uterus, however, these bacteria are also described as opportunistic pathogens that cause different degrees of uterine infection, which may be related with reproductive tract infections, and adverse effects on fertility, encouraging the animal sacrifice.
REFERENCES
BOSCÁN OJ, Zambrano NS, Nava J, Portillo MG. Perfil de la flora bacteriana vaginal. Un riesgo potencial para la reproducción de vacas criollo limonero. Revista Científica. 2010; 20:227-234.
CREDILLE BC, Woolums AR, Giguere S, Robertso T, Overton MW, Huerley DJ. Prevalence of bacteremia in dairy cattle with acute puerperal metritis. J Vet Intern Med 2014; 28:1606-1612.
FERNÁNDEZ MA, Silveira PA, López RO. Infecciones uterinas en la hembra bovina. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria REDVET. 2006; 7(10):1-37. Galvão KN. Postpartum uterine diseases in dairy cows. Animal Reproduction. 2012; 9:290-296.
GONZÁLEZ M, Ríos RR, Mattar S. Prevalencia de bacterias asociadas a la infertilidad infecciosa en bovinos de Montería, Colombia. Revista MVZ Córdova. 2007; 12:1028-1035.
O´LEARY C. Salmonella dublin in Irish cattle. Veterinary Ireland Journal. 2014; 4(12):642-643.
MARTINS TM, Borges AM. Avilacão uterina em vacas durante o puerperio. Rev Bras Reprod Anim. 2011; 35:433-443.
MORENO MC. Hafnia alvei. Revista Chilena de Infectología. 2009; 26: 355.
NIELSEN LR. Salmonella Dublín in Dairy Cattle: use of diagnostic test for investigation of risk factors and infection dynamics (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Copenhagen. 2003.
ORREGO AJ, Delgado CA, y Echeverría C. L. Vida productiva y principales causas de descarte de Vacas Holstein en la Cuenca de Lima. Rev. Inves. Vet. Perú. 2003; 14:68-73.
PYÖRÄLÄ S, Taponen S. Coagulase-negative-staphylococci-Emerging mastitis pathogens. Veterinary Microbiology. 2009; 134:1-26.
SÁNCHEZ LM, González CC, Castañeda SR, Pulido VA, Guáqueta MH, Aranda SM, Rueda VM. Evaluación citológica y microbiológica de lavados uterinos en bovinos con problemas reproductivos (estudio preliminar). Revista MVZ Córdova. 2011; 1:2711-2720.
SANTOS MA, Gilbert RO, Caixeta LS, Machado VS, Texeira LM, Bicalho RC. Susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated from uteri of postpartum dairy cows to antibiotic and environmental bacteriophages. Part II: In vitro antimicrobial activity evaluation of a bacteriophage cocktail and several antibiotics. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010: 93(1):105-114.
SAS (STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM INSTITUTE). User´s Guide: Statistics, Cary, NC, USA Inst. Inc. 1982.
SHELDON IM, Dobson H. Postpartum uterine health in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science. 2004; 82-83:295-306.
WERNER A, Suthar V, Plöntzke J, Heiwieser W. Relationship between bacteriological findings in the second and fourth weeks postpartum and uterine infection in dairy cows considering bacteriological results. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012; 95:7105-7114.