medigraphic.com
ISSN 0138-7103 (Print)

2016, Number 1

Next >>

Revista del Hospital Psiquiátrico de La Habana 2016; 13 (1)

Structural analysis of the State-Trait Depression Inventory in patients with diagnosis of depression from Lima

Dominguez-Lara SA

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page:
PDF size: 119.37 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The State-Trait Depression Inventory is a newly implemented tool for assessing the affective component of depression, but has no instrumental studies in clinical samples.
Method: Was evaluated a clinical sample of 103 patients with depression diagnosis (51.5% male) aged between 18 and 59 years (M = 31.72). Using structural equation modeling, was evaluated the model of two oblique factors, euthymia and dysthymia, predominant in literature, in each section of State-Trait Depression Inventory, State and Trait.
Results: The two-factor structure was confirmed, similar to the results obtained in other studies. Similarly, was evaluated the reliability of scores and construct reliability, obtaining appropriate indicators.
Conclusion: Were confirmed adequate psychometric properties with the study sample. The practical implications and limitations of the study are discussed.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2002. Reducing Risks, promoting Healthy Life. Ginebra: World Health Organization; 2002.

  2. World Health Organization. Mental Health and development: targeting people with mental health conditions as a vulnerable group. Ginebra: World Health Organization; 2010.

  3. Spielberger CD, Agudelo D, Buela-Casal G. Inventario de Depresión Estado/ Rasgo (IDER). Madrid: TEA Ediciones; 2008.

  4. Sotelo L, Sotelo N, Dominguez S, Poma I, Cueto E, Alarcón D, et al. Propiedades Psicométricas del Inventario de Depresión Estado-Rasgo (IDER) en una muestra de Adultos de Lima Metropolitana. Av Psicol. 2012; 20(2): 59-68.

  5. Agudelo D. Propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Depresión Estado/Rasgo (IDER) con adolescentes y universitarios de la ciudad de Bucaramanga. Pensam psicol. 2009; 5(12): 139-60.

  6. Agudelo D, Spielberger CD, Buela-Casal G. La depresión: ¿un trastorno dimensional o categorial? Salud Mental 2007; 30(3): 20-8.

  7. Agudelo D, Gómez Y, López P. Propiedades Psicométricas del Inventario de Depresión Estado Rasgo (IDER) con una muestra de población general colombiana. Av Psicol Latinoam. 2014; 32(1): 71-84.

  8. Ocampo L. Análisis correlacional del Cuestionario de Depresión Estado/Rasgo (ST/DEP) con una muestra de adolescentes y universitarios de la ciudad de Medellín (Colombia). Psicol Caribe 2007; 20(2): 28-49.

  9. Vera-Villarroel P, Buela-Casal G, Celis-Atenas K, Córdova-Rubio N, Encina-Olea N, Spielberger CD. Chilean experimental version of the State-Trait Depression Questionnaire (ST-DEP): Trait Sub-scale (T-DEP). Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2008; 8(2): 563-75.

  10. Merino C, Pflucker D, Riaño-Hernández D. Análisis factorial exploratorio del Inventario de Depresión Estado-Rasgo (ST-DEP) en adolescentes. Diversitas Perspect Psicol. 2012; 8(2): 319-30.

  11. Agudelo D, Carretero-Dios H, Blanco A, Pitti, C, Spielberger CD, Buela- Casal, G. Evaluación del componente afectivo de la depresión: análisis factorial del ST/DEP revisado. Salud Mental 2005; 28(3): 32-41.

  12. Graham J, Guthrie A, Thompson B. Consequencs of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Struct Equ Modeling 2003; 10(1): 142-53.

  13. Thompson B. The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1997; 57(1): 5-19.

  14. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16(3); 297-334.

  15. Graham JM. Congeneric and essentially tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006; 66(6): 930 – 44.

  16. Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problema of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014; 105(3): 399 – 412.

  17. McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1999.

  18. Hancock GR, Mueller RO. Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. En: Cudeck R, du Toit SHC, Sörbom D, coordinador. Structural equation modeling: Past and present. A Festschrift in honor of Karl G. Jöreskog. Chicago: Scientific Software International; 2001. p. 195–261.

  19. Lee SY, Poon WY, Bentler PM. A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1995; 48: 339–58.

  20. Dominguez S. Propuesta para el cálculo del Alfa Ordinal y Theta de Armor. Rev Invest Psicol. 2012; 15(1): 213-17.

  21. Dominguez S. ¿Matrices Policóricas/Tetracóricas o Matrices Pearson? Un estudio metodológico. Rev Argent Cienc Comport. 2014; 6(1): 39-48.

  22. Remthulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psych Method. 2012; 17(3): 354-73.

  23. Lei PW, Wu Q. Estimation in structural equation modeling. En: Hoyle RH (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guildford Press; 2012, p. 164–79.

  24. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluationg structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981; 18(1): 39 – 50.

  25. Dominguez S, Merino C ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? Rev Latino Cien Social Niñez Juventud 2015; 13(2): 1326-28.

  26. Merino C, Navarro J, García W. Revisión de la consistencia interna del Inventario de Inteligencia Emocional de Bar-On, EQ-I: YV. Revista Peruana de Psicología y Trabajo Social 2014; 3(1):141-54.

  27. Ponterotto JG, Ruckdeschel DE. An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Percep Mot Skills 2007; 105: 997 – 1014.

  28. Van der Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J. A checklist for testing measuremente invariance. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2012; 9(4): 486-92.

  29. Reise, S. The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivar Behav Res. 2012; 47(5): 667-96.

  30. Ponterotto JG, Charter RA. Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel´s (2007) reliability matriz for estimating the adecuacy of internal consistency coefficients. Percep Mot Skills 2009; 108: 878 – 86.

  31. Baader T, Molina JL, Venezian S, Rojas C, Farías R, Fierro-Freixenet C, et al. Validación y utilidad de la encuesta PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) en el diagnóstico de depresión en pacientes usuarios de atención primaria en Chile. Rev Chil Neuro-Psiquiat. 2012; 50(1): 10-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com