medigraphic.com
ISSN 1727-897X (Electronic)

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Medisur 2016; 14 (1)

Osseointegration of immediate transalveolar implants

González BY, Castillo BEE, Mesa RB

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 26-33
PDF size: 341.92 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: osseointegration is critical to start prosthetic rehabilitation.
Objective: to describe osseointegration of immediate transalveolar implants.
Methods: a prospective case series study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2013. It included all patients (75 patients with 79 implants) who attended the Prosthodontics service. Age, sex, osseointegration, cause of tooth loss, region of the implant, specific tooth, bone level and keratinized gingiva around the implant, were the variables studied. Frequency distribution and statistical analysis were used for data analysis.
Results: females and patients aged 31 to 45 years predominated. Osseointegration was observed in 97.4% of the implants. Nearly all implants were placed in the premaxilla and posterior maxilla, specifically in the first bicuspids. In most patients, osseointegration with bone formation occurred at the implant collar and in the presence of completely keratinized tissue, with a statistically significant association between the two variables.
Conclusion: rehabilitation treatment with this type of implant led to successful osseointegration in most cases studied.


REFERENCES

  1. Marín A, Navarro P, Fuentes R. Use of Different Antibiotics Protocols in Implantologic Surgery in the Cities of Antofagasta, Concepción and Temuco. Int J Odontostomat [revista en Internet]. 2012 [ cited 21 Jul 2015 ] ; 6 (2): [aprox. 10p]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X201200020 0002.

  2. Fuentes R, Weber B, Flores T, Oporto G. Uso de profilaxis antibiótica en implantes dentales: Revisión bibliográfica. Int J Odontostomat [revista en Internet]. 2010 [ cited 12 Mar 2014 ] ; 4 (1): [aprox. 6p]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X201000010 0001.

  3. Cruz Morales R, Caballero López D, Cápiro Rubio MC, Lima Reyna MT. Autoinjerto libre de tejido conectivo y epitelio en implantes para sobredentadura (primera etapa). Presentación de un caso. Rev Méd Electrón [revista en Internet]. 2011 [ cited 12 Mar 2014 ] ; 33 (3): [aprox. 7p]. Available from: http://www.revmatanzas.sld.cu/revista medica/ano 2011/vol3 2011/tema15.htm.

  4. Dinatale E, Guilarte C. Aspectos microbiológicos en implantología. Revisión de la literatura. Acta Odontol Venez [revista en Internet]. 2009 [ cited 14 Mar 2014 ] ; 47 (4): [aprox. 12p]. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_art text&pid=S0001-63652009000400014&lang=pt.

  5. Sánchez Garcés MA, Álvarez Camino JC, Corral Pavón E, González Martínez R, Alves Marques J, Párraga Manzol G, et al. Revisión bibliográfica de Implantología Bucofacial del año 2010. Primera parte. Avances en Periodoncia [revista en Internet]. 2012 [ cited 14 Mar 2014 ] ; 24 (1): [aprox. 38p]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1699-6585201200010 0003.

  6. Koh RU, Rudek I, Wang HL. Immediate implant placement: Positives and negatives. Implant Dent. 2010 ; 19 (2): 98-108.

  7. Hurzeler MB, von Mohrenschildt S, Zuhr O. Stage-two implant surgery in the esthetic zone: A new technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 ; 30 (2): 187-93.

  8. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Lindhe J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 ; 21 (1): 13-21.

  9. Freitas AC, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, Rocha EP, de Almeida EO. Aesthetic approach in single immediate implant-supported restoration. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 ; 21 (3): 792-6.

  10. Acocella A, Bertolai R, Sacco R. Modified insertion technique for immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the first maxillary molar sites: A 3-year prospective study. Implant Dent. 2010 ; 19 (3): 220-8.

  11. Akca K, Kokat AM, Comert A, Akkocaoglu M, Tekdemir I, Cehreli MC. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 ; 39 (2): 169-73.

  12. Caneva M, Salata LA, de Souza SS, Baffone G, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Influence of implant positioning in extraction sockets on osseointegration: Histomorphometric analyses in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 ; 21 (1): 43-9.

  13. Sánchez Cobo E, Hita Iglesias C, Guevara Gutiérrez E, Sánchez Sánchez FJ, Galindo Moreno P, Sánchez Fernández E. Implantes inmediatos: indicaciones, técnica y resultados. Gaceta Dental: Industria y Profesiones. 2006 (172): 90-109.

  14. Davarpanah M, Caraman M, Szmukler Moncler S, Jakubowicz Kohen B, Alcolforado G. Preliminary data of a prospective Clinical study on the osscotitc NT Implant: 18- month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impant. 2005 ; 20 (3): 448-54.

  15. Sánchez Garcés MA, Álvarez Camino JC, Corral Pavón E, González Martínez R, Alves Marques J, Párraga Manzol G, et al. Revisión bibliográfica de Implantología Bucofacial del año 2010. Segunda parte. Avances en Periodoncia [revista en Internet]. 2012 [ cited 14 Mar 2014 ] ; 24 (2): [aprox. 32p]. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S1699-65852 012000200003&script=sci_arttext.

  16. Martin DC, O´Ryan FS, Indresano AT, Bogdanos P, Wang B, Hui RL, et al. Characteristics of implant failures in patients with a history of oral bisphosphonate therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 ; 68 (3): 508-14.

  17. Fransson C, Tomasi C, Pikner SS, Grondahl K, Wennstrom JL, Leyland AH, et al. Severity and pattern of peri-implantitis-associated bone loss. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 ; 37 (5): 442-8.

  18. Piattelli A, Crespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in Monkeys. J Periodontol. 2003 ; 74 (3): 346-52.

  19. Kwasnicki A, Butterworth C. 360 degrees peri-implant, keratinised, soft-tissue grafting with stereolithographic-aided dressing plate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 ; 38 (1): 87-90.

  20. Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Yi YJ, Lee HJ, Kim SG, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 ; 107 (3): e24-8.

  21. Lemus Cruz LM, Almagro Urrutia ZE, Sáez Carriera R, Justo Díaz M, Sánchez Silot C. Fallas mecánicas y biológicas en las prótesis sobre implantes. Rev Haban Cienc Méd [revista en Internet]. 2012 [ cited 14 Mar 2014 ] ; 11 (4): [aprox. 12p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext& pid=S1729-519X2012000400017.

  22. Isaksson R, BecktorJP, Brown A, Laurizohn C, Isaksson S. Oral health and oral implant status in edentulous patients with implant-supported dental prostheses who are receiving long-term nursing care. Gerodontology. 2009 ; 26 (4): 245-9




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com