medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2016; 4 (1)

Use of pendulum for molar distalization: Case report

Villa DI, Díaz YL, Katagiri KM

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 36-42
PDF size: 585.98 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Treatment of mild or moderate Class IIrelationshipscan be possible without extraction of bicuspids with a correct diagnosis. Distalization of upper molars may be used for obtaining a correct Class I relationship between molars and cuspids without bicuspidextractions. Currently, this treatment has become more frequent mainly due to new biomaterials and conceptual changes in mechanical forces. Many authors have designed different appliances to achieve this goals.


REFERENCES

  1. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using a pendulum appliance: Part 1. Angle Orthod. 1997; 67 (4): 249-260.

  2. Kloehn SJ. Evaluation of cervical traction of the maxilla and maxillary first permanent molar. Angle Orthod. 1961; 31: 91-104.

  3. Bass NM. The use of extra-oral traction in current orthodontics. Orthodontist. 1970; 2 (1): 11-15.

  4. Mitani H, Brodie AG. Three plane analysis of tooth movement grow and angular changes with cervical traction. Angle Ortho. 1970; 40: 80-94.

  5. Wieslander L. The effect of force on craniofacial development. Am J Orthod. 1974; 65 (5): 531-538.

  6. Baumrind S. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84 (5): 384-398.

  7. Quirós OJ. Ortodoncia nueva generación. Venezuela, Editorial AMOLCA, 2003. pp. 169-216.

  8. Testa M. Técnicas ortodónticas. Guía para la construcción y utilización de dispositivos terapéuticos. Colombia, Editorial AMOLCA, 2005. pp. 114-126.

  9. Marin MG. Distalización de molares. Diferentes métodos. Rev Cubana Orthod. 2001; 16 (2): 102-107.

  10. Keim RG, Berkman C. Intra-arch maxillary molar distalization appliances for class II correction. J Clin Orthod. 2004; 38 (9): 505-511.

  11. Clemmer EJ, Hayes EW. Patient cooperation in wearing orthodontic headgear. Am J Orthod. 1979; 75 (5): 517-524.

  12. El-Mangoury NH. Orthodontic cooperation. Am J Orthod. 1981; 80 (6): 604-622.

  13. Egolf RJ, BeGole EA, Upshaw HS. Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 97 (4): 336-348.

  14. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod. 1992; 26 (11): 706-714.

  15. Snodgrass DJ. A fixed appliance for maxillary expansion, molar rotation, and molar distalization. J Clin Orthod. 1996; 30 (3): 156-159.

  16. Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110 (6): 639-646.

  17. Favero F. Lingual orthodontics in pediatric patients. In: Romano R, ed. Lingual orthodontics. London, UK: BC Decker; 1998. pp. 127-134.

  18. Scuzzo G, Pisani F, Takemoto K. Maxillary molar distalisation with a modified pendulum appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1999; 33 (11): 645-650.

  19. Kinzinger G, Fuhrmann R, Gross U, Diedrich P. Modified pendulum appliance including distal screw and uprighting activation for non-compliance therapy of Class II malocclusion in children and adolescents. J Orofac Orthop. 2000; 61 (3): 175-190.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com