Aude DRA, Sánchez MW, Cárdenas JM, Gutiérrez CFJ, Mariel MH

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 19
Paginas: 31-35
Archivo PDF: 255.46 Kb.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Evaluar si existe una variación en la medición del índice Bolton, realizando las medidas de manera manual y de manera digital. Material y métodos: Se analizaron 70 pares de modelos de estudio; los cuales fueron medidos en dos ocasiones; mediante el uso de un compás y una regla milimetrada, y mediante el uso de un vernier electrónico. Resultados: No se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre ambas mediciones. Conclusión: Las dos formas de realizar la medición dental mesiodistalmente son buenas opciones para el análisis de Bolton.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Trehan M, Agarwal S, Sharma S. Applicability of Bolton’s analysis: a study on jaipur population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 5 (2): 113-117.

2. Tayyab M, Zakir S, Hussain U, Jehan R, Nasrullah Z. Bolton discrepancies among different classes of malocclusion in peshawar population. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2014; 34 (4): 647-650.

3. Anil S, Monika M. Bolton analysis of Himachali Ethnic Population. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2010; 2 (4): 12-14.

4. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth size analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1962; 48: 504-529.

5. Saini SG, Kahlon SS, Boparai CDS, Padda HK, Bhinder NK, Mann HK. Bolton’s ratio applicability on north Indian population. Indian Journal of Comprehensive Dental Care (IJCDC). 2014; 4 (2): 443-447.

6. Oktay H, Ulukaya E. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (3): 307-312.

7. Profitt WR, Fields HW, Sanier DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th edition. Elsevier; 2012. pp. 181-185.

8. Wedrychowska-Szulc B, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Stepień P. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (3): 313-318.

9. Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R. Do Bolton’s ratios apply to a Spanish population? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (3): 428-430.

10. Pizzol KC, Goncalves JR, Santos-Pinto AD, Peixoto AP. Bolton analysis: an alternative proposal for simplification of its use. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011; 16 (6): 69-77.

11. Ricci ID, Scanavini MA, Kaieda AK, Rosário HD, Paranhos LR. Bolton ratio in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Braz J Oral Sci. 2013; 12 (4): 357-361.

12. Rao GP. Bolton’s norms for Hyderabad population. Annals & Essences of Dentistry. 2012; 4 (3): 70-79.

13. Fernandes TMF, Sathler R, Natalicio GL, Castanha Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth widths in Caucasian, African and Japanese individuals with Brazilian ancestry and normal occlusion. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18 (3): 130-135.

14. Subbarao VV, Regalla RR, Santi V, Anita G, Kattimani VS. Interarch tooth size relationship of indian population: does Bolton’s analysis apply? J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014; 15 (1): 103-107.

15. Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lim WH, Lee S, Lim J, Park HJ. Variation of the intermaxillary tooth-size relationship in normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33 (1): 9-14.

16. Jóias RP, Velasco LG, Scanavini MA, de Miranda AR, Siqueira DF. Evaluation of the Bolton ratios on 3D dental casts of brazilians with natural, normal occlusions. World J Orthod. 2010; 11 (1): 67-70.

17. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RK, Bendeus M, Yeung S. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (5): 589-595.

18. Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod. 2012; 39 (3): 151-159.

19. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (6): 794-803.