Aude DRA, Sánchez MW, Cárdenas JM, Gutiérrez CFJ, Mariel MH

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 31-35
PDF size: 254.10 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess whether there is a variation in the values of Bolton index, making measurements manually or digitally. Material and methods: 70 pairs of study models were analyzed and measured on two occasions: one using a compass and a millimeter rule, and the other using an electronic vernier. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two measurements. Conclusion: Both ways to perform mesiodistal dental measurements are good choices for Bolton analysis.

REFERENCES

1. Trehan M, Agarwal S, Sharma S. Applicability of Bolton’s analysis: a study on jaipur population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 5 (2): 113-117.

2. Tayyab M, Zakir S, Hussain U, Jehan R, Nasrullah Z. Bolton discrepancies among different classes of malocclusion in peshawar population. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2014; 34 (4): 647-650.

3. Anil S, Monika M. Bolton analysis of Himachali Ethnic Population. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2010; 2 (4): 12-14.

4. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth size analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1962; 48: 504-529.

5. Saini SG, Kahlon SS, Boparai CDS, Padda HK, Bhinder NK, Mann HK. Bolton’s ratio applicability on north Indian population. Indian Journal of Comprehensive Dental Care (IJCDC). 2014; 4 (2): 443-447.

6. Oktay H, Ulukaya E. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (3): 307-312.

7. Profitt WR, Fields HW, Sanier DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th edition. Elsevier; 2012. pp. 181-185.

8. Wedrychowska-Szulc B, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Stepień P. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (3): 313-318.

9. Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrian R. Do Bolton’s ratios apply to a Spanish population? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (3): 428-430.

10. Pizzol KC, Goncalves JR, Santos-Pinto AD, Peixoto AP. Bolton analysis: an alternative proposal for simplification of its use. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011; 16 (6): 69-77.

11. Ricci ID, Scanavini MA, Kaieda AK, Rosário HD, Paranhos LR. Bolton ratio in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Braz J Oral Sci. 2013; 12 (4): 357-361.

12. Rao GP. Bolton’s norms for Hyderabad population. Annals & Essences of Dentistry. 2012; 4 (3): 70-79.

13. Fernandes TMF, Sathler R, Natalicio GL, Castanha Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth widths in Caucasian, African and Japanese individuals with Brazilian ancestry and normal occlusion. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18 (3): 130-135.

14. Subbarao VV, Regalla RR, Santi V, Anita G, Kattimani VS. Interarch tooth size relationship of indian population: does Bolton’s analysis apply? J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014; 15 (1): 103-107.

15. Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lim WH, Lee S, Lim J, Park HJ. Variation of the intermaxillary tooth-size relationship in normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33 (1): 9-14.

16. Jóias RP, Velasco LG, Scanavini MA, de Miranda AR, Siqueira DF. Evaluation of the Bolton ratios on 3D dental casts of brazilians with natural, normal occlusions. World J Orthod. 2010; 11 (1): 67-70.

17. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RK, Bendeus M, Yeung S. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (5): 589-595.

18. Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod. 2012; 39 (3): 151-159.

19. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (6): 794-803.