Díaz NYJ, Fernández EF, Díaz NYC

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 132-143
PDF size: 219.33 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Clinic trials to evaluate suppression are generally designed to check only their presence. In this work the reliability of quantifying suppression based on contrast is evaluated. Dichoptic task for discrimination of global motion was used with a random dot kinematograms. A chromatic technique based on division of visible spectra, was used for development of dichoptic presentation, and the quantification variant comprising binocular and dichoptic stages was selected. To determinate the performance the staircase method was used. Despite the limitations of experiment, the results support the theory on the relevance of intraocular contrast imbalance in the suppression process; they confirm the reliability of quantifying suppression based on contrast and validate the feasibility of dichoptic chromatic technique.

REFERENCES

1. Birch EE. Amblyopia and Binocular Vision. Prog Tetin Eye Res 2013;33:67-84.

2. Sireteanu R. The Binocular Visual System in Amblyopia. Strabismus 2000:8(1):39-52.

3. Mower GD, Christen WG, Burchfiel DF. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthal- mol Vis Sci 2007;48.

4. Mitchell DE, Duffy KR. The case from animal studies for balanced binocular treatment strategies for human amblyopia. Ophthalmic & Phisiological Optics. 2014;34:129-45.

5. Li J, Thompson B, Lam CSY, Deng D, Chan LY, Machara WG, et al. The role of suppression in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4169-76.

6. Hess RF, Thompson B. New insights into amblyopia: Binocular therapy and noninvasive brain stimulation. Journal of AAPOS. 2013;17(1):89-93.

7. Mansouri B, Thompson B, Hess RF. Measurement of suprathreshold binocular interactions in amblyopia. Vision Research. 2008;48:2775-84.

8. Black JM, Hess RF, Cooperstock JR, To L, Thompson B. The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia. Journal of Visualized Experiments [Internet] December 2012 [citado 18 agosto 2014]:(70) . Disponible en: http://www.jove.com/video/3927

9. Levi DM, Yu C, Kuai S, Rislove E. Global contour processing in amblyopia. Vision Research. 2007;47:512-24.

10. Mansouri B, Hess RF, Allen HA, Dakin SC. Integration, segregation, and binocular combination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2005;22(1):38-48.

11. Hess RF, Hutchinson CV, Ledgeway T, Mansouri B. Binocular influences on global motion processing in the human visual system. Vision Research 2007;47:1682-92.

12. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B. A new binocular approach to the treatment of Amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2010;28:793-802.

13. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B. Restoration of Binocular Vision in Amblyopia. Strabismus 2011;19(3):110-8.

14. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B. A Binocular Approach to Treating Amblyopia: Antisuppression Therapy. Optometry and Vision Science 2010;87(9):697-704.

15. Vitali A, Facoetti G, Gargantini A. An Environment for Contrast-Based Treatment of Amblyopia Using 3D Technology. International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation 2013 [Internet] [citado 17 julio 2014]. Disponible en: http://cs.unibg.it/gargantini/research/papers/ICVR_2013.pdf

16. Narasimhan S, Harrison ER, Giaschi DE. Quantitative measurement of interocular suppression in children with amblyopia. Vision Research 2012;66:1-10.

17. Blundell BG. An Introduction to Computer Graphics Creative 3-D Environments. London: Springer 2008.

18. Woods AJ, Yuen KL, Karvinen KS. Characterizing crosstalk in anaglyphic stereoscopic images on LCD monitors and plasma displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display 2007;15(11):889-98.

19. Sanftmann H, Weiskopf D. Anaglyph Stereo Without Ghosting. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering 2011.