Saint LR, Torres TJF, González CV

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 44-49
PDF size: 509.78 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In our days, functional and esthetic reconstruction is one of the problems most frequently encountered when treating patients with facial defects. This reconstruction entails to choose among rehabilitation materials to use in each case. Extra-oral implants play an important role in prosthetic support, they bear influence into esthetic, functional and psychological aspects, granting better quality of life to the patient. The aim of the present study was to functionally and esthetically rehabilitate the patient as well as improve his quality of life with the use of an implant-supported nasal prosthesis.

REFERENCES

1. Keerl R, Weber R, Scholtes W, Draf W, Heieis G, Trainer D. Prosthetic rehabilitation after craniofacial surgery. Skull Base Surgery. 1996; 6 (4): 207-213.

2. Lemon JC, Kiat-amnuay S, Gettleman L, Martin JW, Chambers MS. Facial prosthetic rehabilitation: preprosthetic surgical techniques and biomaterials. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13 (4): 255-262.

3. Cirugía plástica y Estética, Cirugía Craneomaxilofacial, Estética dental y Implantes; Isla de Nelson 2, Madrid 28035. Tumores de la nariz/reconstruccion nasal. Disponible en: http://www.drlalinde.com/tumores_faciales/nariz.htm

4. Borgia SG, Asociación Brasilera de Enseñanza Odontológica (ABENO). Prótesis buco-maxilo-facial sobre implantes extraorales, San Pablo 2007. 2007

5. Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Fyler A, Funk G. Effects of implant anchorage on midface prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78 (5): 496-500.

6. Rubin P. Odontología clínica Enfoque multidisciplinaria para médicos y estudiantes. Octava ed. Saunders elservier science. Disponible en: http://books.google.com.mx/books?id=-whwqAxkacMC&pg=PA736&lpg=PA736&dq=fracciones+en+radioterapia&source=bl&ots=X55B2KSfTL&sig=N_oXzslG-pIMNJ9iOSsvh5RZ4b8&hl=es&ei=JJDfSajsKJfmnQe4pKCxCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9#PP8,M1

7. Sosa et al. Prótesis Faciales Retenidas con Implantes e Imanes: Presentación de Tres Casos Clínicos en Pacientes Oncológicos de Prótesis Maxilofacial del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Cancerología. 2008; 3: 71-76.

8. Borgia SG, Asociación Brasilera de Enseñanza Odontológica (ABENO). Prótesis buco-maxilo-facial sobre implantes extraorales: estado actual. 2007.

9. Guttal SS, Patil NP, Nadiger RK, Hasti A. Nasal prosthesis for a patient with mammalian bite injury. The Journal of Indian Prothodontic Society. 2007; 7 (1): 43-45.

10. — Allen PF, Watson G, Stassen I, Mcmillan AS. Peri-implant soft tissue maintenance in patients with craniofacial implant retained prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 29 (2): 99-103.

11. — Alvi R, McPhail J, Hancock K. Closed-field titanium magnets for the retention of complex craniofacial prostheses. Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55 (8): 668-670.

12. — Tolman DE, Taylor PF. Bone-anchored craniofacial prosthesis study: irradiated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11 (5): 612-619.

13. — Lundgren S, Moy PK, Beumer J 3rd, Lewis S. Surgical considerations for endosseous implants in the craniofacial region: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 22 (5): 272-277.

14. — Oh WS, Roumanas E, Beumer J 3rd. Maxillofacial restoration after head and neck tumor therapy. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007; 28 (2): 70-76; quiz 77, 101.

15. — Abu-Serriah MM, McGowan DA, Moos KF, Bagg J. Extra-oral craniofacial endosseous implants and radiotherapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32 (6): 585-592.

16. — Roumanas ED, Chang TL, Beumer J. Use of osseointegrated implants in the restoration of head and neck defects. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006; 34 (9): 711-718.

17. — Cheng AC, Leong EW, Khin NT, Wee AG, Fung CK, Lee CM. Osseointegrated implants in craniofacial application: current status. Singapore Dent J. 2007; 29 (1): 1-11.