medigraphic.com

2015, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2015; 53 (6)

Knowledge transfer for STI / HIV / AIDS prevention among adolescents

Olvera-Blanco MA, Moreno-Monsiváis MG, de la Garza-Salinas LH

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 742-748
PDF size: 177.76 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: The transfer of knowledge is a crucial process for the functioning and continuation of training programs. The aim of this study was to determine how the transfer process works for the program JUVENIMSS and the factors that relate to the transfer of knowledge.
Methods: The study design was correlational, involving 122 health professionals. The Scale for the Measurement of Implementation Components was used. To analyze descriptive statistical data, overall index, instrument subscales, Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fi t test, and correlations were used.
Results: The average age of the professionals involved in the program was 37 years (standard deviation n = 10.5), with a predominance of females (84 %), and 48 % social workers. Knowledge transfer for the prevention of STI / HIV / AIDS among adolescents is correlated with administrative support, administrative personnel management, leadership, training, supervision / technical support and performance evaluation.
Conclusions: Knowledge transfer showed areas of opportunity that should be considered by decision-makers to promote the implementation and continuation of preventive programs to prevent risky sexual behavior among adolescents.


REFERENCES

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR]. Knowledge translation at CIHR-Dr. Ian D. Graham. Canadá; 2007. Recuperado de http://www.cihr-irsc. gc.ca/e/33747.html

  2. Fixsen DL, Blase KA, Horner R, Sugai G. Readiness for change. Scaling up brief #3. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG, SISEP; 2009.

  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR]. Moving into action: We know what practices we want to change, now what? An implementation guide for health care practitioners. Canadá; 2012; Recuperado de http://www.cihr-irsc.ca/e/45669.htlm

  4. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008;41(3-4):171-81.

  5. Wandersman A, Chien VH, Katz J. Toward an evidence- based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2012;50(3-4):445-59.

  6. Collins CB, Edwards AE, Jones PL, Kay L, Cox PJ, Puddy RW. A comparison of the Interactive Systems Framework (ISF) for Dissemination and Implementation and the CDC Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention’s Research-to-Practice model for behavioral interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3-4):518-29.

  7. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the infl uence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008;41(3-4):327-50.

  8. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629.

  9. Mar OAL. Promotores adolescentes PREVENIMSS guía técnica. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; 2010.

  10. Fixsen D, Panzano P, Naoom S, Blasé K. Measures of implementation components of the national implementation research network frameworks. Chapel Hill: Authors; 2008.

  11. Ogden T, Bjørnebekk G, Kjøbli J, Patras J, Christiansen T, Taraldsen K, et al. Measurement of implementation components ten years after a nationwide introduction of empirically supported programs--a pilot study. Implementation Science. 2012;7:49.

  12. Secretaría de Salud. Reglamento de la ley general de salud en materia de investigación para la salud. México; 1987. Recuperado de http://www.salud.gob. mx/unidades/cdi/nom/compi/rlgsmis.html

  13. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social [IMSS]. Guía del cuidado de la salud del adolescente de 10 a 19 años. 2011. Recuperado de http://www.cbtis179.edu. mx/portal2/alumnos/descargas/guia_de_salud_del_ adolescente_imss.pdf

  14. Villarruel AM, Gal TL, Eakin BL, Wilkes A, Herbst JH. From research to practice: the importance of community collaboration in the translation process. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2010;24(1):25-34.

  15. Sanders MR, Prinz RJ, Shapiro CJ. Predicting utilization of evidence-based parenting interventions with organizational, service-provider and client variables. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(2): 133-43.

  16. Asgary-Eden V, Lee CM. Implementing an evidencebased parenting program in community agencies: what helps and what gets in the way? Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012;39(6):478-88.

  17. McCormack L, Sheridan S, Lewis M, Boudewyns V, Melvin CL, Kistler C, et al. Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of healthrelated evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013(213):1-520.

  18. Duffy JL, Prince MS, Johnson EE, Alton FL, Flynn S, Faye AM, et al. Enhancing teen pregnancy prevention in local communities: capacity building using the interactive systems framework. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3-4):370-85.

  19. Hunter SB, Chinman M, Ebener P, Imm P, Wandersman A, Ryan GW. Technical assistance as a prevention capacity-building tool: a demonstration using the getting to outcomes framework. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36(5):810-28.

  20. Kegeles SM, Rebchook G, Pollack L, Huebner D, Tebbetts S, Hamiga J, et al. An intervention to help community-based organizations implement an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention: the Mpowerment Project technology exchange system. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;49(1-2):182-98.

  21. Ray ML, Wilson MM, Wandersman A, Meyers DC, Katz J. Using a training-of-trainers approach and proactive technical assistance to bring evidence based programs to scale: an operationalization of the interactive systems framework’s support system. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2012;50(3- 4):415–427. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9526-6

  22. Chinman M, Acosta J, Ebener P, Q Burkhart, Clifford M, Corsello M, et al. Establishing and evaluating the key functions of an interactive systems framework using an assets-getting to outcomes intervention. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3-4):295-310.

  23. Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH. Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(4):423-31.

  24. Shaw RJ, Kaufman MA, Bosworth HB, Weiner BJ, Zullig LL, Lee SY, et al. Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTNIMPROVE study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:106.

  25. Straus SE, Moore JE, Uka S, Marquez C, Gü lmezoglu AM. Determinants of implementation of maternal health guidelines in Kosovo: mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:108.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com