2015, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2015; 38 (4)
Modification of the hemodynamic parameters and BIS during induction with propofol versus propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients
Alarcón-Almanza JM, Castro-Ortega J, Moyao-García D, Ramírez-Mora JC
Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 239-244
PDF size: 240.79 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The anesthetic management is included in three phases: induction, maintenance and emersion. Intravenous drugs in inducing aim to maintain stability and hemostasis in the patients. The drugs most used for this purpose does not fully achieve this goal. The tendency to counteract these adverse effects of combining drugs with different action drugs.
Material and methods: Blind randomized clinical trials study, which included patients from 1-10 years, ASA I-III elective surgery under general anesthesia. Two groups were formed. Propofol group (group p) 3 mg/kg of propofol was administered. Propofol ketamine group (group pk) propofol 2.5 mg/kg was administered and ketamine 0.5 mg/kg during induction. Baseline vital signs were recorded, at 1, 3 (endotracheal intubation), 5, 10 and 15 minutes.
Results: 29 patients were included, 15 p group and 14 pk group. Both heart rate, blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) and bispectral index decrease in the p group, not so in the pk group where vital signs were stable. Saturation did not change in any group. No statistically significant differences.
Conclusions: The combination of propofol, ketamine compared with propofol as the only clinically inductor provides greater hemodynamic stability.
REFERENCES
Davis PJ, Cladis FP, Motoyama EK. Smith’s anesthesia for infants and children. 8th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Mosby; 2011.
Benítez-Tang SM, Ortiz-Valiente F. Anestesia endovenosa total con y sin ketamina, para la resección de los neurinomas del acústico. Ensayo clínico [Tesis]. La Habana.
Hans P, Dewandre P, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V. Comparative effects on bispectral index and spectral entropy of the electroencephalogram under sevoflurane anesthesia. Br J Anesth. 2005;94:336-340.
Muñoz-Cuevas JH, De la Cruz-Paz MA, Olivero-Vásquez YI. Propofol ayer y hoy. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2005;28:148-158.
Santiveri X, Moltò L, Rodríguez C, Sandín F, Vilaplana J, Castillo J. Sedoanalgesia con propofol-ketamina a bajas dosis para la práctica del bloqueo retrobulbar. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2006;53:545-549.
Sakai K, Cho S, Fukusaki M, Shibata O, Sumikawa, K. The effects of propofol with and without ketamine on human cerebral blood flow velocity and CO2 response. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:377-382.
Badrinath S, Avramov M, Shadrick M, Witt T, Ivankovich A. The use of a ketamine-propofol combination during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:858-862.
Tomatir E, Atalay H, Gurses E, Erbay H, Bozkurt P. Effects of low dose ketamine before induction on propofol anesthesia for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Anesth. 2004;14:845-850.
Goel S, Bhardwj N, Jain K. Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:628-634.
Erdogan MA, Begec Z, Aydogan MS, Ozgul U, Yucel A, Colak C, et al. Comparison of effects of propofol and ketamine-propofol mixture (ketofol) on laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamics in elderly patients: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. J Anesth. 2013;27:12-17.
Ülgey A, Aksu R, Bicer C, Akin A, Altuntaş R, Esmaoğlu A, et al. Is the addition of dexmedetomidine to a ketamine-propofol combination in pediatric cardiac catheterization sedation useful? Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:770-774.
Eker HE, Cok OY, Ergenoğlu P, Ariboğan A, Arslan G. IV paracetamol effect on propofol-ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. J Anesth. 2012;26:351-356.