Lemuz-López R, Gómez-López W, Ayaquica-Martínez I, Guillén-Galván C

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 107-114
PDF size: 3241.78 Kb.

ABSTRACT

We present an algorithm for electrodes selection associated with motor imagery activity. The algorithm uses a clustering technique called k-means to form groups of sensors and selects the group corresponding to the highest correlation activity. Then, we evaluate the selected electrodes computing the classification index using the projective decomposition called common spatial patterns and a linear discriminant method in a left hand vs right foot motor imagery classification task. This approach significantly reduces the number of electrodes from 118 to 35 while improving the classification accuracy index.

REFERENCES

1. [1] W.O. Tatum, A. M. Husain, S.R. Benbadis, and P.W. Kaplan. Handbook of EEG interpretation. Demos Medical Publishing, Cambridge, MA, 2007.

2. [2] B. Blankertz, M. Kawanabe, R. Tomioka, F.U. Hohlefeld, V. Nikulin, and K.R. Müller. Invariant common spatial patterns: Alleviating nonstationarities in braincomputer interfacing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, pages 113–120, 2008.

3. [3] G. Dornhege, J. del R. Millán, T. Hinterberger, D. McFarland, and K.R. Müller, editors. Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.

4. [4] H. Ramoser, J. Müller-Gerking, and G. Pfurtscheller. Optimal spatial filtering of single trial eeg during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng, 8:441–446, 1998.

5. [5] Y. LI, H. Kambara, Y. Koike, and M. Sugiyama. Application of covariate shift adaptation techniques in braincomputer interfaces. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering, 57(6):1318–1324, 2010.

6. [6] S. Mika, G. Rätsch, J Weston, B Schölkopf, A. Smola, and K. R. Müller. Invariant feature extraction and classification in kernel spaces. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, pages 526–532, 2000.

7. [7] P. Rajesh and N. Rao. Brain-Computer Interfacing: An Introduction. Cambridge, 2013.

8. [8] A. Barachant and S. Bonnet. Channel selection procedure using riemannian distance for bci applications. Proc. Int. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf. Neural Eng., pages 348–51, 2011.

9. [9] T. Lan, D. Erdogmus, A. Adami, M. Pavel, and S. Mathan. Salient eeg channel selection in brain computer interfaces by mutual information maximization. Proc. Int. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf., pages 7064–7, 2005.

10. [10] B. Blankertz, R. Tomioka, S. Lemm, M. Kawanabe, and K.R. Müller. Optimizing spatial filters for robust eeg single-trial analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25(1):41–56, 2008.

11. [11] H. Ombao and S. van Bellegem. Coherence analysis: A linear filtering point of view. IEEE transactions of Signal processing, 6(56):2259–2266, 2008.

12. [12] H. Ramoser, J. Müller-Gerking, and G. Pfurtscheller. Optimal spatial filtering of single trial eeg during imagined hand movement. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(4):441–446, 2000.

13. [13] J. Macqueen. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, 1:281–297, 1967.

14. [14] E. Forgy. Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency vs. interpretability of classifications. Boiometrics, 21:768–780, 1965.

15. [15] R. Xu and Donald C.Wunsch II. Clustering. IEEE Computational Intelligence Society, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

16. [16] G. Gan, C. Ma, and J.Wu. Data Clustering. Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Series on Statistics and Applied Probability ASA. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics SIAM, 2007.

17. [17] L. Cocchi, A. Zalesky, T. Ulrike, T. J. Whitford, M. De-Lucia, M. M. Murray, and O. Carter. Dynamic changes in brain functional connectivity during concurrent dual-task performance. PLoS ONE, 6(11):e28301, 11 2011.

18. [18] B. van Wijk, C. M. Bernadette, P.J. Beek, and A. Daffertshofer. Neural synchrony within the motor system: what have we learned so far? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(252), 2012.