medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-6037 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Asociación Mexicana de Comunicación, Audiología, Otoneurología y Foniatría, A.C.,

2015, Number 2

Next >>

Rev Mex AMCAOF 2015; 4 (2)

The challenge of hearing amplification in pediatric patients

Rosete DM

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 53-60
PDF size: 418.10 Kb.


Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Northern J. Probe microphone measurements: hearing aid selection and assessment. (1992).

  2. Scollie SD, Seewald RC. Predicting aided levels of speech from clinical test signals. Ear and Hearing. 2002; 23: 477-487.

  3. Moodie KS, Seewald RC, Sinclair ST. Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. Am J Audiol. 1994; 3: 23-31.

  4. Moodie KS, Seewald R, Bagatto M et al. The DSL Method for Pediatric and Adult Hearing Instrument Fitting: Version 5 National Centre for Audiology. Faculty of Health Sciences University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, publicado por PHONAK.

  5. Calvo C. Prueba de Audiometría Verbal en Ruido PAVER PIP-UNED. (2014). http://www.phonak-pip.es/cuestionario/index.asp

  6. Calvo C. Utilización de los sistemas FM en el contexto escolar. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología. 2005; 25(2): 84-94.

  7. Barnet A. EEG audiometry in children under three years of age. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1971; 72: 1-13.

  8. Lightfoot G, Kennedy V. Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: accuracy, speed and the effects of stimulus presentation features. Ear Hear. 2006; 27: 443-456.

  9. Rosete M, Cornejo JM, Ortiz S, Granados P, Castillo S, Castañeda N et al. Ensayo clínico con PEALM en pacientes usuarios de implante coclear. Memorias del IX Simposio de la AMCAOF. 2006; 19(03): 160.

  10. Granados P, Carranco L, Castañeda N, Castillo S, Cornejo J. Electrode by electrode hearing threshold measurement in the implant patient. 14th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children. December, 2014. Nashville, Tennessee.

  11. Cornejo JM, Granados P. Cochlear implant mapping through electrical cochlear response. 7th International Symposium on Objective Measures in Auditory Implants. September, 2012. Amsterdam, The Netherland.

  12. Cornejo JM, Tirado C, Granados MP. Estimating audiometry through scalp electric potential technique in CI users. 10th International Conference of Cochlear Implants and other Implantable Auditory Technologies. 2008. p. 299.

  13. Picton T, Woods D, Baribeau-Braun J et al. Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol. 1977; 6: 90-119.

  14. Tsu B, Wong LL, Wong EC. Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41: 330-333.

  15. Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Souza PE, Binns MA. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol. 2007; 12 (4): 234-246.

  16. Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Miller CW. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50(7): 459-467.

  17. Van Dun B, Carter L, Dillon H. Sensitivity of cortical auditory evoked potential detection for Hearing impaired infants in response to short speech sounds. Audiol Res. 2012; 2e13: 65-76.

  18. Billings CJ, Papesh MA, Penman TM, Baltzell LS, Gallun FJ. Clinical use of aided cortical auditory evoked potentials as a measure of physiological detection or physiological discrimination. Int J Otolaryngol. 2012; 2012: 365752.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com