medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2015; 29 (2)

Proximal humerus fractures: clinical assessment and functional outcome in patients with osteonecrosis of the humeral head

Gómez-Mont LJG, Gil-Orbezo F, Morales-Domínguez H, Flores-Carrillo A, Levy-Holden G, Capuano-Tripp P

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 88-96
PDF size: 227.72 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Fractures of the proximal humerus resulting in three or more fragments represent a high risk of necrosis. The former is the second most frequent site of necrosis, only after the femur, due to either traumatic or nontraumatic causes. The former are the most common, with an incidence rate of necrosis of 13-34% in fractures with more than four fragments. The purpose of this study is to assess the functional outcome of patients with a history of fracture of the proximal humerus and osteonecrosis treated conservatively. Material and methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study with a 6-12 month follow-up of patients older than 60 years of age with a diagnosis of fracture of the proximal humerus managed conservatively between January 2004 and November 2009. One hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and 12 were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 71.02 years with a range between 60 and 92 years; 41 males and 69 females. The DASH and CONSTANT scales were applied. Results: After applying the functional assessment scales and validating the results, the correlation coefficient obtained was 0.80, and it was statistically significant. Conclusion: Conservative treatment should be used only in patients who meet the necessary criteria. Depending on the type of fracture and the patient’s characteristics, treatment should always be aimed at stabilization, early mobilization, and early functional recovery. This study found that fractures treated conservatively eventually develop some degree of osteonecrosis of the head, but they have proper function, similar to that of a healthy limb.


REFERENCES

  1. Marchant MH Jr, Stubbs A, Basamania CJ: Osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Wheeless’ Textbook of Orthopaedics; 2005.

  2. Mankin HJ: Nontraumatic necrosis of bone (osteonecrosis). N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1473-9.

  3. Hattrup SJ, Cofield RH: Osteonecrosis of the humeral head: natural history. Specialty Society Day, American Shoulder and Elbow Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1997 Annual Meeting. San Francisco, California: 1997.

  4. Heimann WG, Freiberger RH: Avascular necrosis of the femoral and humeral heads after high-dosage corticosteroid therapy. N Engl J Med. 1960; 263: 672-5.

  5. Cruess RL, Blennerhassett J, MacDonald FR, MacLean LD, Dossetor J: Aseptic necrosis following renal transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968; 50: 1577-90.

  6. Sturzenegger M, Fornaro E, Jakob RP: Results of surgical treatment of multifragmented fractures of the humeral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1982; 100(4): 249-59.

  7. Loebenberg MI, Plate AM, Zuckerman JD: Osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Instructional course lectures. American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1999; 48: 349-57.

  8. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M: Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13: 427-33.

  9. Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR: The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone. 1996; 18(3 Suppl): 209S-13S.

  10. Gaebler C, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM: Minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures: epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003; 74: 580-5.

  11. Zyto K: Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Injury. 1998; 29: 349-52.

  12. Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD: Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 203-7.

  13. Wanner GA, Wanner-Schmid E, Romero J, Hersche O, von Smekal A, Trentz O, et al: Internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures with two one-third tubular plates. J Trauma. 2003; 54: 536-44.

  14. Koukakis A, Apostolou CD, Taneja T, Korres DS, Amini A: Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 442: 115-20.

  15. Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU: Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17: 319-25.

  16. Resch H, Povacz P, Fröhlich R, Wambacher M: Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79: 295-300.

  17. Calvo E, de Miguel I, de la Cruz JJ, López-Martín N: Percutaneous fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures: indications based on the correlation between clinical and radiographic results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 774-81.

  18. Hintermann B, Trouillier HH, Schäfer D: Rigid internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus in older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82: 1107-12.

  19. Meier RA, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, Rothfischer W, Gross T: Unexpected high complication rate following internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an angled blade plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20: 253-60.

  20. Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, Norton J, Connor PM, Kellam JF: Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20: 547-54.

  21. Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V, Zeiler C, Kroetz M, Mutschler W: Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate. Presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures. Unfallchirurg. 2006; 109: 1032-40.

  22. Cruess RL: Experience with steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the shoulder and etiologic considerations regarding osteonecrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978; 130: 86-93.

  23. Hattrup SJ, Cofield RH: Osteonecrosis of the humeral head: relationship of disease stage, extent, and cause to natural history. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 559-64.

  24. Raiss P, Kasten P, Baumann F, Moser M, Rickert M, Loew M: Treatment of osteonecrosis of the humeral head with cementless surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 340-9.

  25. Constant CR, Murley AH: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; (214): 160-4.

  26. Fabre T, Piton C, Leclouerec G, Gervais-Delion F, Durandeau A: Entrapment of the suprascapular nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81(3): 414-9.

  27. Constant CR: An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79: 695-6.

  28. The DASH outcome measure: disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand. Available in: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/.

  29. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6): 602-8. Erratum in: Am J Ind Med. 1996; 30(3): 372.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com