medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2015; 29 (2)

Shoulder arthroplasty in the private practice. Analysis of demographics and comorbid conditions in a sample of 120 patients

López-Muñoz R, Encalada-Díaz MI, Mondragón-Rodríguez T, Aguirre-Rodríguez VH, Valero-González FS

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 82-87
PDF size: 231.70 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe the demographics in a series of shoulder arthroplasty cases operated in a single hospital and by the same surgical team. Material and methods: 120 shoulder arthroplasties performed between January 2006 and November 2014 were included. The following variables were analyzed: age, gender, baseline diagnosis, type of prosthesis used, comorbid conditions, involved side, occupation, follow-up time, and surgical history. Results: Females accounted for 66% and males 34%; mean age was 66 years and the most frequent diagnosis was arthropathy resulting from rotator cuff tear (30%). The reverse total shoulder prosthesis was used in 51% of cases, followed by the hemiprosthesis in 38%. Seventy per cent of patients were from the Federal District. Arterial hypertension occurred in 23% of cases; 36% of cases had undergone prior surgery; 40% of cases worked at home. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a procedure frequently performed at this hospital. Our case series reports a significant number of cases in which the demographics may give us an overview of shoulder arthroplasty in Mexican patients and describe the characteristics of patients eligible for this procedure, as there are no other registries available.


REFERENCES

  1. Shoulder Joint Replacement: On OrthoiInfo (Internet). American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). Dic 2011. Disponible en la página http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00094

  2. Hasan SS, Leith JM, Smith KL, Matsen FA III: The distribution of shoulder replacement among surgeons and hospitals is significantly different than that of hip or knee replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 164-9.

  3. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, et al: Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7): 1487-97.

  4. Sánchez-Sotelo J: Total shoulder arthroplasty. Open Orthop J. 2011; 5: 106-14.

  5. Van de Sande MA, Brand R, Rozing PM. Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006; 35: 426-34.

  6. Boileau P, Sinnerton RJ, Chuinard C, Walch G: Arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2006; 88(5): 562-75.

  7. Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ: Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(3): 319-37.

  8. Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(2): 202-9.

  9. Feeley BT, Gallo RA, Craig EV: Cuff tear arthropathy: current trends in diagnosis and surgical management. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18(3): 484-94.

  10. Burgess DL, McGrath MS, Bonutti PM, Marker DR: Shoulder resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(5): 1228-38.

  11. Singh JA, Sperling J, Buchbinder R, McMaken K: Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (10): CD008089.

  12. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM: Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(1): 26-34.

  13. Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, Gartsman GM: A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoartrhritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(9): 1947-56.

  14. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM: Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(6): 604-13.

  15. Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, et al: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(8): 1742-7.

  16. Cuff D, Pupello D, Virani N, Levy J, Frankle M: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(6): 1244-51.

  17. Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O’Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(7): 1476-85.

  18. Carter MJ, Mikuls TR, Nayak S, Fehringer EV: Impact of total shoulder arthroplasty on Generic and shoulder-specific health-related quality-of-life measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(17): e127.

  19. Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM: Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 2249-54.

  20. Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM: Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 1115-20.

  21. Teusink MJ, Virani NA, Polikandriotis JA, Frankle MA: Cost analysis in shoulder arthroplasy surgery. Adv Orhtop. 2012; 2012: 692669.

  22. Jain N, Pietrobon R, Hocker S, Guller U: The relationship between surgeon and hospital volumen and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 496-505.

  23. Singh A, Yian EH, Dillon MT, Takayang M: The effect of surgeon and hospital volumen on shoulder artrhoplasty perioperative quality metrics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(8): 1187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.017. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

  24. Hammond JW, Queale WS, Kim TY, McFarland EG: Surgeon experience and clinical and economic outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 2318-2324.

  25. Papadonikolakis A, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd: Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 2205-12.

  26. Skirving AP: Total shoulder arthroplasty-current problems and possible solutions. J Orthop Sci. 1999; 4: 42-53.

  27. Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd: Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(5): 431-41.

  28. Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Neradilek B, Matsen FA 3rd: The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(5): 555-62.

  29. Speriling JW, Hawkins RJ, Walch G, Zuckerman JD: Complications in total shoulder arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2013; 62: 135-41.

  30. Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Fevang BT, Furnes O: A review of national shoulder and elbow joint replacements registries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 1328-35.

  31. Rahme H, Jacobsen MB, Salomonsson B: The swedish elbow arthroplasty register and the swedish shoulder artrhoplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72(2): 107-12.

  32. Sharma S, Dreghorn CR: Registry of shoulder arthroplasy-the Scotthis experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88: 122-6.

  33. Pitto RP, Lang I, Kienapfel H, Willert HG: The German arthroplasty register. Acta Ortohp Scand Suppl. 2002; 73(305): 30-3.

  34. Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA): Demographics and outcomes of shoulder arthroplasy. National Joint Replacemente Registry. 2013; Supplementary Report.

  35. Cortés MMA, Perales RJM, García PJM, Blanco PA: Artroplastía bipolar de hombro en fracturas agudas. Revisión de 30 casos. Acta Ortop Mex. 2013; 17(3): 118-121.6): 1040-4




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com