Jiménez SMJ, Sandoval VF, Rodríguez MEA

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 240-245
PDF size: 286.89 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare marginal fit of zirconia copings manufactured following two different systems: CAD/CAM Cerec InLab (Sirona^®) and Zirkonzahn (Zirkonzahn^®) as well as a Zirkograph 025 ECO (Zirkonzahn^®) pantograph system. Material and methods: A master Cr-Co model stump was manufactured; it was prepared for the zirconia crown of an upper premolar. Ten zirconia copings were manufactured for each group following manufacturer’s instructions. Control group consisted on ten metallic copings. A replication technique was followed using elite HD+ polyvinyl siloxane (Zhermack^®). Measurements were taken using a stereomicroscope at 50x magnification so as to obtain marginal width in microns and thus determine absolute marginal discrepancy of each coping. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS^® software. T-test study was conducted in order to compare obtained data. Results: Mean marginal absolute discrepancy and marginal width were as follows: 92.14 ± 38.59 and 78.62 ± 31.33 µ m for Cerec InLab (Sirona^®) CAD/CAM system, 38.71 ± 12.62 and 36.91 ± 13.56 µ m for Zirkonzahn (Zirkonzahn^®) CAD/CAM system, 77.92 ± 38.01 and 69.42 ± 33.23 μm for Zirkograph 025 ECO (Zirkonzahn^®) pantograph system. Control group made of metal copings exhibited 44.11 ± 15.36 and 43.74 ± 15.70 µ m. With respect to absolute marginal discrepancy and marginal width, significant differences were observed when comparing Cerec InLab (Sirona^®) and Zirkograph 025 ECO (Zirkonzahn^®) with control group. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed between Zirkonzahn (Zirkonzahn^®) CAD/CAM system and the control group. Overall level of statistical significance was p › 0.001. Conclusions: Zirkonzahn^® CAD/CAM system was the most accurate system of all. CAD/CAM Cerec InLab system (Sirona^®) proved to be the less precise system.

REFERENCES

1. Martínez J, Rodríguez D. Comparación de la desadaptación marginal de cofias de zirconio (Y-TZP) realizadas con dos sistemas diferentes: CAD/CAM (Cerec) y pantográfico (Zirkonzahn), mediante estereomicroscopio. Revista Odontos. 2010; 12 (35): 8-22.

2. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Australian Dental Journal. 2011; 56 (1 Suppl.): 97-106.

3. Roberson TM, Heymann H, Swift EJ, Sturdevant CM. Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006.

4. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Jiang L, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 117 (3): 319-325.

5. Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Brufau-de Barbera M, Gomes-Azevedo S. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21 (4): 291-295.

6. Manicone P, Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35 (11): 819-826.

7. Alghazzawi T, Lemons J, Liu P, Essig M, Bartolucci A, Janowski G. Influence of low-temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21 (5): 363-369.

8. Heintze S. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory test on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9 (1): 77-106.

9. Beuer F, Korczynski N, Rezac A, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts. Clinical Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010; 2: 5-11.

10. Biscaro L, Bonfiglioli R, Soattin M, Vigolo P. An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns. J Prosthodont. 2013; 22 (1): 36-41.

11. Tannamala P, Azhagarasan NS, Shankar K. Evaluation of marginal gap of Ni-Cr copings made with conventional and accelerated casting techniques. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24 (1): 146-152.

12. McLean JW, von Frauenhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971; 131: 107-111.

13. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62 (4): 405-408.

14. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-cermic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005; 113 (2): 174-179.

15. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dental Materials. 2009; 25 (1): 94-102.

16. Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105 (4): 249-255.

17. Kohorst P, Junghanns J, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15 (4): 527-536.

18. Caparroso-Pérez CB, Marín-Muñóz DV, Velásquez AE. Adaptación marginal y ajuste interno en estructuras de zirconia-ytria elaboradas con los sistemas CAD/CAM Procera y Cerec InLab. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 2011; 22 (2): 186-197.

19. Bindl A, Mormann W. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32 (6): 441-447.

20. Santamaría Y, Aldana K, Martín J. Comparación de la adaptación marginal e interna de las coronas fabricadas con tres sistemas totalmente cerámicos. Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia. 2009.

21. Park JH, Kwon TK, Yang JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yeo IS. A comparative study on the marginal fit of zirconia cores manufactured by CAD/CAM and copy milling methods. Dentistry. 2013; 3 (2): 163.

22. Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi AAR. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent. 2013; 14 (3): 118-129.