medigraphic.com
Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2015; 60 (4)

Use of biomaterials as grafts for tympanoplastia type I

Girón-Archundia E, Zárate-García RA, Núñez-Sánchez E, Vargas-Zavala C

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 221-229
PDF size: 555.45 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare two biomaterials (bioplastic and fascia autologous graft) as grafts for closing of tympanic perforation in an animal model.
Material and method: An experimental, prospective study was made including 26 male adult guinea pigs, in the hospital center of third level, Bioterio of Universidad Panamericana. Group 1 (cases, polyurethane): left ear (n=26). Group 2 (control, abdominal rectus muscle fascia) right ear (n=26).
Results: We obtained similar rates of closing with both materials. Histological analysis showed different qualities between both grafts.
Conclusions: Bioplastic is a biomaterial that may be used as graft in tympanoplastias. More studies are needed to assess its efficacy and effectiveness, and to corroborate a proper profile of safety for its clinical use.


REFERENCES

  1. Schmitt H. Importance of sound pressure and umbral protection in transformation of sound and hearing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1957;49:71.

  2. Møller AR. Hearing : anatomy, physiology, and disorders of the auditory system/A.R. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier 2006;210.

  3. Vermette P, Marois Y, Guidoin R, et al. Biocompatibility of polyurethanes. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes. Eurekah 2001;77-96.

  4. Feenstra L, Kohn FE, Feyen J. The concept of an artificial tympanic membrane. CIin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1984;9:215-220.

  5. Gibb AG, Chang SK. Myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 1982;96:915-930.

  6. Wever EG, Lawrence M. Physiological Acoustics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954;416-419.

  7. Lim DJ. Human tympanic membrane. An ultrastructural observation. Acta Otolaryngol 1970; 70:176-186.

  8. Portmann G. Portmann M. The surgery of the deafness. Arch Otolaryngol 1964;72:230-236.

  9. Berthold E. About myringoplasty. Wien Med Blätter 1878;26:627-639.

  10. Wullstein HL. Functional middle ear surgery with the aid of free graft.

  11. O’Connor KN, Puria S. Middle-ear model parameters based on a population of human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;123:197-211.

  12. Griffiths MV. Biomaterials in reconstructive head and neck surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1979;4:363-376.

  13. West JL, Jun HW, Taite LJ. Peptide modified polyurethane compositions and associated methods 2006. Patente US 2006/0067909.

  14. Perales A, Antonio Martinez Richa A. Tesis posdoctoral. Universidad de Guanajuato.

  15. Kristensen S. Spontaneus healing of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations in man: a century of experience. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:1037-1050.

  16. Ma Y, Zhao H, Zhou X. Topical treatment with growth factors for tympanic membrane perforations: progress towards clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:586-599.

  17. Liu CY, Yu EC, Shiao AS, Wang MC. Learning curve of tympanoplasty type I. Auris Nasus Larynx 2009;36:26-29.

  18. Gladstone HB, Jackler RK, Varav K. Tympanic membrane wound healing. An overview. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:913-932.

  19. Kay DJ, Nelson M, Rosenfeld RM. Meta-analysis of tympanostomy tube sequelae. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:374-380.

  20. Martínez-Richa A. Comunicado personal. Profesor titular B. SNI II, Universidad de Guanajuato, México.

  21. Gerard JM, Monnoye V, DEggouj N, Gersdorff M. A classical retro-auricular incision in cochlear implantation. Mediterr J Otol 2005;1:105-109.

  22. Olmos Zúñiga R, González López R, Gaxiola M, Jasso R, et al. Empaquetamiento del oído medio con esponja de colágena polivinil pirrolidona. Estudio experimental en cobayos. Rev Invest Clín 2009,61:497-504.

  23. Thabane L, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:1.

  24. Arch-Tirado E, Verduzco Mendoza A, Azuara Pliego E, Hernandez-Orozco F, Collado Corona MA. Utilidad del cobayo como modelo de estudios audiológicos y propuesta de accesos quirúrgicos al oído y cuello. Cir Ciruj 2005;73:339-344.

  25. Estados Unidos Mexicanos. AFIA. Especificaciones técnicas para la producción, cuidado y uso de animales de laboratorio de la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-ZOO.1999. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 6 de diciembre de 1999.

  26. NIH USA. Guía para el cuidado y uso de los animales de laboratorio. Edición mexicana auspiciada por la Academia Nacional de Medicina. México, 2002.

  27. Truy E, Disant F, Morgon A. Chronic tympanic membrane perforation: an animal model. Am J Otol 1995;16:222-225.

  28. Amoils CP, Jackler RK, Lustig LR. Repair of chronic tympanic membrane perforations using epidermal growth factor. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:669-683.

  29. Archundia EG, Zárate García RA, Vargas C, Sanchez E. A novel animal model for chronic tympanic membrane perforation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;149:232.

  30. Yannas IV, Natural materials. In: Rather BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. San Diego: Biomaterial science, Academic Press, 1996;84-94.

  31. Nimni ME, Cheung D, Strates B, Kodama M, Shiekh K. Chemicallymodified collagen: a natural biomaterial for tissue replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:741-771.

  32. Reunión de Investigación de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Panamericana. México, DF, 26 de abril del 2013. 2o lugar en la categoría póster.

  33. Glasscock ME. Tympanic membrane grafting with fascia: overlay vs undersurface technique. Laryngoscope 1973;83:754-770.

  34. Kohn FE. Development of biodegradable polymers for application in myringoplasty. The Netherlands: Thesis, Technological University of Twente, 1984.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com