Carballo RO, Barcas TB

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 1103-1110
PDF size: 690.73 Kb.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive and prospective study was carried out from January to May, 2014, in order to characterize the detection of the global movement direction in students with orthographic disorders, for which the Gabor patch was used. Two groups of 9-11 years students were selected; one with orthographic disorders and the other one with good academic results, belonging to "Nguyen Van Troi" Primary School in Santiago de Cuba. The results indicated that children of the first group didn't carry out appropriate perceptive inferences of the global movement direction. There were no evidences that the global advantage facilitated the detection of the movement direction; therefore, they made more mistakes when determining the trajectory of the movement for vertical orientations of the grating, it the contrary for the horizontal location where they showed their best performance.

REFERENCES

1. Pammer K, Lavis R, Cornelissen P. Visual encoding mechanisms and their relationship to text presentation preference. DYSLEXIA. 2004;10(2): 77-94.

2. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Morgan WR. The Detection of both Global Motion and Global Form Is Disrupted in Glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005; 46(10): 3693–701.

3. Chen Y, Nakayama K, Levy D, Matthysse S, Holzman P. Processing of global, but not local, motion direction is deficient in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 2003; 61: 215–27.

4. Borst A, Egelhaaf M. Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci. 1989; 12(8): 297-306.

5. Blanca MJ, López Montiel D, López Montiel G. Factores que interactúan con la dominancia global en el procesamiento de estímulos jerárquicos. Anales de Psicología. 2006; 22(2): 273-89.

6. Benedet MJ. Fundamento teórico y metodológico de la neuropsicología cognitiva. Madrid: Editorial INSERSO; 2002.

7. Serrano Chica FD. Disléxicos en español: papel de la fonología y la ortografía. Tesis doctoral. Granada: Universidad de Granada; 2005.

8. Armstrong V, Maurer D, Lewis TL. Sensitivity to first - and second - order motion and form in children and adults. Vision Res. 2009; 49(23): 2774–81.

9. Flombaum JI, Scholl BJ, Santos LR. Spatiotemporal priority as a fundamental principle of object persistence. Oxford Scholarship Online; 2012.

10. 10.Blanca MJ, Luna R, López Montiel D, Rando B, Zalabardo C. Procesamiento global y local con tareas de categorización de la orientación. Anales de Psicología. 2001; 17(2): 247-54.

11. Jones DG, Anderson ND, Murphy KM. Orientation discrimination in visual noise using global and local stimuli. Vision Res. 2003; 43: 1223–33.

12. 12.Galletti C, Fattori P. Neuronal mechanisms for detection of motion in the field of view. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41(13): 1717–27.

13. 13.Lamouret I, Cornilleau-Pérès V, Droulez J. Lines and dots: characteristics of the motion integration process. Vision Res. 2001; 41(17): 2207–19.

14. 14.Blanca MJ, Luna R, López D, Zalabardo C, Rando B. Características de los estímulos y de la tarea en el procesamiento de los rasgos global y local. Psicológica. 2001; 22: 267-91.

15. Iribarren C, Jarema G, Lecours AR. Two different dysgraphic syndromes in a regular orthography, spanish. Brain Lang. 2001; 77(2): 166–75.

16. 16.Smith EE, Osherson DN. An invitation to cognitive science. 2 ed. Milan: Istituto San Raffaele; 1995.

17. Nigel W. Visual Development. 2 ed. USA: Springer Science; 2006.

18. Styles EA. Attention, perception and memory: an integrated introduction. New York: Psychology Press; 2005.

19. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009 [citado 8 Feb 2015].

20. Stein J. Visual motion sensitivity and Reading. Neuropsicología. 2003; 41:1785–93.