Caravia PI, Vela CI

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 23-29
PDF size: 946.71 Kb.

ABSTRACT

An updated review of the subject uroflowmetry or urinary flowmetry pointing normal values in figures, the application of different normograms to validate its performed outcomes; different forms of urinary curves and their semantic value and the need to accompany the post void ultrasound provides greater reliability testing. The revision of the tool will issue updated for urology services to commence such studies.

REFERENCES

1. Abrams, P. Urodynamics. Third edition, Springer-Verlag London, 2006, Pag. 20

2. Gupta DK, Sankhwar SN, Goel A. Uroflowmetry nomografíafms for healthy children 5 to 15 years old. J Urol 2013, sept,190(3):1008-13.

3. La estandarización de la terminología de la función del tracto urinario inferior en niños y adolescentes: reporte de la estandarización del Continencia de los niños. JUrol 2008; 32(4): 371-389.

4. Chan CK, Yip SK, Wu IP, Li ML, Chan NH. Evaluation of the clinical value of a simple flowmeter in the management of male lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 2012, jun,109(11):1690-6.

5. Choudhury S, Agarwal MM, Mandal AK, Mavuduru R, Mete UK, Kumar S, Singh SK. Which voiding position is associated with lowest flow rates in healthy adult men? role of natural voiding position. Neurourol Urodyn 2010 Mar5; 29 (3): 413-7 Jan; 30 (1): 58-61.

6. Drach GW, Binard W. Disposable peak urinary flowmeter estimates lower urinary tract obstruction. 1976, J Urol, feb; 115(2); 175-9.

7. Drach GW, Layton TN, Binard WJ. Male peak urinary flow rate: relationships to volume voided and age. J Urol 1979, 122(2); 210-4.

8. Agarwal MM, Choudhury S, Mandal AK, Mavuduru R, Singh SK. Are urine flow-volume nomograms developed on Caucasian men optimally applicable for Indian men? Need for appraisal of flow-volume relations in local population. Indian J Urol 2010, Jul; 26(3):338-44.

9. Barapatre Y, Agarwal MM, Singh SK, Sharma SK, Mavuduru R, Mete UK, Kumar S, Mandal AK. Uroflowmetry in healthy women: Development and validation of flow-volume and corrected flow-age nomograms. Neurolurol Urodyn 2009; 28(8):1003-9.

10. Perera M, Jones B, O'Brien M, Hutson JM. Long-term urethral function measured by uroflowmetry after hypospadias surgery: comparison with an age matched control. J Urol 2012 Oct6; 188 (4 suppl): 1457-62.

11. Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI. Primary bladder neck dysfunction in children and adolescents III: results of long-term alpha-blocker therapy. J Urol 2010 Feb; 183 (2): 724-30.

12. Ahmed S, McNanley A, Perevich M, Glantz JC, Buchsbaum G. Uroflow measurements in healthy female volunteers. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov; 16(6): 327-30.

13. Jørgensen JB, Colstrup H, Frimodt-Møller C. Uroflow in women: an overview and suggestions for the future. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dusfunction, 1998; 9 (1) 33-6.

14. Chan CK, Yip SK, Wu IP, Li ML, Chan NH. Evaluation of the clinical value of a simple flowmeter in the management of male lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 2012, jun,109(11):1690-6.

15. Dicuio M, Vesely S, Knutson T, Damber JE, Cuzzocrea DE, Dahlstrand C. Is it possible to predict post-residual voided urine by bladder scan before uroflowmetry--a useful and timesaving test to reduce the number of non--evaluable uroflow measurements? Arch Ital Url Androl 2010 Jun; 82 (2): 100-4.