medigraphic.com
ISSN 2225-4676 (Electronic)

2015, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Neurol Neurocir 2015; 5 (S1)

Neurocognitive particularities of extra linguistic processing of verbal code

Omar ME, Rodríguez AY, Pino MM

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: S41-S48
PDF size: 351.54 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To expose the most important peculiarities of verbal processing code through each extralinguistic cognitive subsystem.
Development: Linguistic ability is a distinctive peculiarity of humans. Languaje is essential for social adaptation and the regulation of behavior in humans. However, though language is a cognitive function whit very important genetic predisposition, the verbal information are presented as a arbitraries code systems, conditioned by social and cultural factors, and his decode, during verbal communication, implies nom linguistic levels of cognitive processing. Linguistic processing needs verbal code. Necessary, this code has to be transformed, from an auditive or visual sign, to a mental representation utilizable by the cognitive system. At the contrary way, the message activation, in a conceptual level, needs to be capable by the linguistic level and being encoded like a verbal message for pragmatic use. It implies the participation of several cognitive subsystems of processing that are important for comprehension and verbal production.
Conclusions: The points of view about extralinguistic processing of verbal code, and the different extralinguistic cognitive systems, are very important for clinical practice and for to research in the area of language illness. They are very useful for neurolingüístic practice, because permits the understanding of primary and secondary linguistic alteration.



REFERENCES

  1. Omar Martinez E, Broche Pérez Y. Conversión auditivo–mental del código verbal. Los procesos de conversión acústico–fonémica. En: Ruiz L, Álvarez MR, Muñoz A, Pérez Y, Jackson D, eds. Comunicación Social: Retos y perspectivas Vol. II. Santiago de Cuba: Centro de Lingüística Aplicada; 2015. p. 641–5.

  2. Dronkers NF, Pinker S, Damasio A. Lenguaje y afasias. En: Kandel ER, eds. Principios de neurociencia. Madrid: McGraw–Hill/Interamericana; 2004. p.1169–85.

  3. Ellis WA, Young WA. Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press; 2000.

  4. Benedet MJ. Fundamento teórico y metodológico de la neuropsicología cognitiva. Madrid: INSERSO; 2002.

  5. Benedet MJ. Acercamiento neurolingüístico a las alteraciones del lenguaje. Editorial EOS; 2006.

  6. Martin RC. Lenguaje processing: functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:55–9.

  7. Benítez–Burraco A. Caracterización neuroanatómica y neurofisiológica del lenguaje humano. Revista Española de Lingüística 2006;35:461–94.

  8. Omar Martinez E. El problema del diagnóstico de la afasia desde la perspectiva de la Neuropsicología Cognitiva. Rev Hosp Psiquiátrico de La Habana 2011 [citado 3.4.2015]; 8(3). Disponible en: http://www.revistahph.sld.cu/hph3-2011/hph1R311.html

  9. Omar Martinez E, Pardo Maza VM, Antúnez Laffita VA. Evolución histórica del concepto afasia: apuntes sobre su abordaje teórico en neuropsicología. En: Ruiz Millares L, Álvarez Silva MR, Muñoz Alvarado A, eds. Actualizaciones en Comunicación Social. Vol. I. Santiago de Cuba: Centro de Lingüística Aplicada; 2013. p. 423–7.

  10. Batista–Pazeto TC, Gotuzo–Seabra A, Martins–Dias N. Executive functions, oral language and writing in preschool children: development and correlations. Paidéia. 2014;24(58):213–21.

  11. Kapa L, Colombo J. Executive function predicts artificial language learning. J Mem Lang. 2014;76:237–52.

  12. Dörr O. Esquizofrenia, lenguaje y evolución (o las esquizofrenias como logopatías). Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2010;38(1):1–7.

  13. Accatino S. Alteraciones del lenguaje en la esquizofrenia. Revista Memoriza.com 2012 [citado 3.4.2015];9:1–8. Disponible en: http://www.memoriza.com/documentos/revista/2012/eqz2012_9_1-8.pdf

  14. Estevez–González A, García–Sanchez C, Barraquer–Bordas LI. La memoria y el aprendizaje: experiencia y habilidad en el cerebro. Rev Neurol. 1997; 25: 1976–88.

  15. Szmalec A, Brysbaert M, Duyck W. Working memory and language processing. Belgium: Ghent University; 2011.

  16. Baddeley AD. Working memory and language: an overview. J Commun Disord. 2003;36:189–208.

  17. Baddeley A. Working memory and conscious awareness. In Collins AF, Gathercole SE, Conway MA, Morris PE, ed. Theories of memory. Reino Unido: LEA; 1993. p. 11–28.

  18. Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255:556–9.

  19. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4: 417–23.

  20. Shipstead Z, Lindsey DRB, Marshall RL, Engle RW. The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. J Mem Lang. 2014;72:116–41.

  21. Van Dyke JA, Johns CL, Kukona A. Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition. 2014;131:373–403.

  22. Miettinen H. Phonological Working Memory and L2 Knowledge. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä; 2012.

  23. Emmorey K, McCullough S, Mehta S, Grabowski TJ. How sensory–motor systems impact the neural for language: direct contrasts between spoken and signed language. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1–13.

  24. Liao DA, Kronemer SI, Yau JM, Desmond JE, Marvel CL. Motor system contributions to verbal and non–verbal working memory. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1–8.

  25. Berent I, Brem AK, Zhao X, Seligson E, Pan H, Epstein J, Stern E, Galaburda AM, Pascual–Leone A. Role of the motor system in language knowledge. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences 2015; PNAS Early Edition.

  26. Darcy I, Mora JC, Daidone D. Attention Control and Inhibition Influence Phonological Development in a Second Language. Concordia working papers in applied linguistics. 2014;5:115–29.

  27. Moscovitch M, Umilta C. Modularity and neuropsychology: Modules and central processes in attention and memory. Behav Brain Sci. 1991;19:1–59.

  28. Luck EJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK. Event–related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4:432–40.

  29. Omar Martinez E. Factores asociados a alteraciones secundarias del Sistema de Control Atencional en pacientes afásicos. Neurol Arg. 2012 [citado 3.4.2015];4(2):59–66. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-neurologia-argentina-301-articulo-factores-asociados-alteraciones-secundarias-del-90137720

  30. Kenemans JL, Bekker EM, Lijffijt M, Overtoom CCE, Jonkman LM, Verbaten MA. Attention deficit and impulsivity: Selecting, shifting, and stopping. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005; 58: 59–70.

  31. Mendoza G, Merchant H. Motor system evolution and the emergence of high cognitive functions. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;122:7–93

  32. Bialystok E, Poarch G, Luo L, Craik FI. Effects of Bilingualism and Aging on Executive Function and Working Memory. Psychol Aging. 2014;29(3):696–705.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com