Martín BN, Martínez AMÁ, Morera PM, Pereira FJ

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 273-280
PDF size: 82.43 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: laparoscopic colon resection was reported for first time in 1990 by Moisés Jacobs and Gustavo Plascencia. Total colectomy is a complex procedure for patients with Familial Multiple Polyposis (FMP) and Idiopathic Ulcerative Colitis (IUC). The laparoscopic approach provides important benefits to the patient as compared to the conventional surgery, including lower risk of tumor recurrence in cancer cases. Objective: to describe the surgical results from the used of the videolaparoscopic total colectomy.
Methods: a descriptive study of a consecutive series of 14 patients who underwent videolaparoscopic total colectomy in the National Center of of Minimal Access Surgery in the period of January 2005 through August 2012. The study variables were age, sex, surgical indication, surgical time, transfusional requirements during surgery, stay at hospital, and transoperative and postoperative complications. The information was drawn from the individual medical histories. Percentages, means and standard deviations, medians and interquartile range were taken for asymmetric samples, in terms of summary measures of the used variables.
Results: the surgical indications were familial multiple polyposis and idiopathic ulcerative colitis. Females predominated. The age range was 16 to 76 years. The average surgical time was 265.0 ± 54.7 minutes, with no transoperative complications. There were six patients with postoperative complications, four of them were reoperated on to correct the disorders, the patients successfully recovered.
Conclusions: videolaparoscopic total colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure for the surgical treatment of familial multiple polyposis and for idiopathic ulcerative colitis.

REFERENCES

1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic resection). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144-50.

2. HALS Study Group. Hand- assisted laparoscopy surgery with the handport system: initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg. 2000;231:715-23.

3. HALS Study Group. Hand-assisted laparoscopy surgery vs standart laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:896-901.

4. Pietrabissa A, Moretto C, Carobbi A, Boggi U, Chilli M, Mosca F. Hand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection: initial experience with a new procedure. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:431-5.

5. HIS Health Group (Medical Data International). U.S. Surgical Procedure Volumes 2001. Englewood, CO: HIS Health Group; 2001.

6. Nelson H, Sargent D. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;66:245-8.

7. Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1179-86.

8. Hong D, Lewis M, Tabet J. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs open resection for benign colorectal disease. Surg Laparosc Endos Percutan Tech. 2002;12:238-42.

9. Chung CC, Tsang WWC, Kwok SY. Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:528-43.

10. Joo JS, Amarnath L, Wexner SD. Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial? Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1341-4.

11. Eijsbouts QAJ, Heuff G, Sietses C. Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colonic polyps. Br J Surg. 1999;86:505-8.

12. Hernández CG, Franklin ME, Cabello OV, Elizondo JD. Colectomía subtotal laparoscópica. Resultados en Texas Endosurgery Institute. Cir. 2007;75(1):443-8.

13. Pinedo MG. Colectomía total laparóscopica para el tratamiento de inercia colónica. Resultados quirúrgicos y funcionales. Rev Chil Cir. 2008;60(5):410-7.

14. Reismann P, Salky BA, Edye M. Laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease: indications and results. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:1201-3.

15. Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Grumbach NM. Laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn's disease: which patients are good candidates? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;23:44-6.

16. Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Sun CT. Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;1(14):109-17.

17. Kirman I, Belizon A, Balik E, Feingold D, Arnell T, Horst P, et al. Perioperative sargramostim (recombinant human GM-CSF) induces an increase in the level of soluble VEGFR1 in colon cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:1169-76.

18. Belizon A, Horst P, Balik E, Feingold D, Arnell T, Azarani T, et al. Persistent elevation of plasma VEGF levels during the first month following minimally invasive colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:287-97.

19. Kumara S, Hoffman A, Nasar A, Belizon A, Baxter R, Jain S, et al. Colorectal resection, open more so than minimally invasive in patients with benign indications is associated with proangiogenic changes in the plasma levels of angiopoietin 1 and 2. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:S352-S482.

20. Goldfarb M, Brower S, Schwaitzberg SD. Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):304-34.

21. Noel J, Fahrbach K, Estok R, Cella C, Frame D, Linz H, et al. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:291-30.