Villalobos-Ramírez L

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 333-337
PDF size: 197.68 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. McElwain J, Malik MA, Harte BH, Flynn NM, Laffey JG, et al. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope and Airtraq laringoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:483-489.

2. Pott LM, Murray WB. Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2008;21:750-758.

3. Sakles J, Rodgers R, Keim S. Optical and video laryngoscopes for emergency airway management. Intern Emerg Med. 2008;3:139-143.

4. Hagberg CA. Videolaryngoscopes. In: 14th Annual Society for Airway management scientific meeting. Chicago (US): 2010.

5. Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Moeller T, Thee C, Wagner K. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:473-477.

6. Dimitriou VK, Zogogiannis ID, Liotiri DG, et al. Awake tracheal intubating using the Airtraq laryngoscope: a case series. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:964-967.

7. Gaszynska E, Samsel P, Stankiewicz-Rudnicki M, Wieczorek A, Gaszynski T. Intubation by paramedics using the ILMA or AirTraq, KingVision, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in vehicle-entrapped patients: a manikin study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21:61-64.

8. Noppens RR, Möbus S, Heid F, Schmidtmann I, Werner C, Piepho T, et al. Evaluation of the McGrath series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:716-720.

9. McGuire BE. Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in awake patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:912-914.

10. Itai J, Tanabe Y, Nishida T, Inagawa T, Torikoshi Y, Kida Y, et al. Tracheal intubation for a difficult airway using Airway scope®, KingVision® and McGRATH®: a comparative manikin study of inexperienced personnel. Crit Care. 2013;17:159.

11. Ray DC, Billington C, Kearns PK, Kirkbride R, Mackintosh K, Reeve CS, et al. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study in novice users: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:1207-1210.

12. Abramson SI, Holmes AA, Hagberg CA. Awake insertion of the Bonfils Retromolar Intubation Fiberscope™ in five patients with anticipated difficult airways. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1215-1217.

13. Hemmerling TM, Bracco D. Subcutaneous cervical and facial enphysema with the use of the Bonfils Fiberscope and high-flow oxygen insufflations. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:260-262.

14. Yao YT, Jia NG, Li CH, Zhang YJ, Yin YQ. Comparison of endotracheal intubation with the Sikani Stylet using the left molar approach and direct laryngoscopy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121:1324-1327.

15. Aramson SI, Holmes AA, Hagberg CA. Awake insertion of the Bonfils Retromolar intubation fiberoscope in five patients with anticipated difficult airways. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1215-1217.

16. Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, Hoy C, Lee E, Scott I, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:440-445.

17. Malik MA, O’Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:128-134.

18. Cooper R, Law J. Rigid and semirigid fiberoptic and video laryngoscopy and intubation. In: Hung O, Murphy M, editors. Management of the difficult and failed airway. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008.