medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2015, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2015; 19 (3)

Assessment of improved glass ionomer microleakage (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with or without use of a conditioner

Jiménez AA, Yamamoto NA

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 170-173
PDF size: 252.35 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to assess microleakage experienced by improved glass ionomer (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with and without use of conditioner. In order to conduct this study, 40 third molars were used. Molars had previously been extracted, cleansed and hydrated. Two 20 randomly selected sample groups were established. Samples were subjected to prophylaxis and class V cavities were created on the vestibular (labial) surface of the teeth. Before ionomer application, and according to manufacturer’s instructions, group A received a polyacrylic acid conditioner. Whereas group B received direct ionomer application. All samples were subjected to a thermo-cycling process and then were immersed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 30 minutes. All molars were sectioned with carbide burr executing longitudinal cuts at the preparation´s center. Each section was carefully examined under the microscope. Samples were rated and the following was observed: microleakage, for group A was 2.06% and for group B 1.84% which did not represent statistically significant differences. It can therefore be concluded that application of conditioner in this type of cavities and with this particular material does not cause statistically significant differences.


REFERENCES

  1. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 45-50.

  2. Berg J. Glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24: 430-438.

  3. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 454-462.

  4. Bedran de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Amaral CM, Ambrosano GM. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002; 14: 107-114.

  5. Castro A, Feigal RE. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24 (1): 23-28.

  6. Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffudion zone and microleakage of a glass ionomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth. Oper Dent. 2005; 30 (1): 105-112.

  7. Hallett KB, García-Godoy F. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study. Dent Mter. 1993; 9: 306-311.

  8. Pereira Pn, Yamada T. Bond strenght and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Am J Dent. 1996; 10: 128-132.

  9. Kao EC, Culbertson BM, Xie D. Preparation of glass ionomer cement using N-acryloyl-substituide amino acis monomer evaluation of physical properties. Dent Mater. 1996; 12: 44-51.

  10. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations of glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one –year results. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33: 17-21.

  11. Pachuta SM, Meiers JC. Dentin surface treatments and glass ionomer microleakage. Am J Dent. 1995; 8: 187-190.

  12. Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24: 423-429.

  13. Ketac Molar Easymix peril técnico del producto 3M.

  14. Toledano M, Osorio E. Microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 610-615.

  15. al-Obaidi FF, Salama FS. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: a comparison of three in vitro procedures. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996; 21 (1): 71-76.

  16. Cattani-Lorente M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water. Dent Mater. 1994; 10: 37-44.

  17. Doerr CL, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. Effect of thermocycling on yhe microleakage of conventional end resin-modifiedglass ionomers. Am J Dent. 1996; 9: 19-21.

  18. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK. Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83 (2): 194-203.

  19. Sidhu SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. In vivo changes in roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer materials. Dent Mater. 1997; 13: 208-213.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com