2002, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Vet Mex 2002; 33 (3)
Population density of Montezuma quail (Cyrtonyx montezumae) in the northeastern region of the State of Mexico, Mexico
Tapia RJ, Ibarra ZS, Mendoza MGD, Zaragoza HC, Clemente SF, Tarango ALA
Language: English/Spanish
References: 30
Page: 255-263
PDF size: 152.34 Kb.
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted in order to determine the population density of the Montezuma quail (Cyrtonyx montezumae) in the northwest region of the State of Mexico. The study area was defined as the II game region of the 1997 hunting calendar 1997. The sampling size included 249 700 ha: 73% forest- and 27% range-land; these areas were considered as the strata. Twenty-two units were sampled by conventional transects (5 km length and 50 m width) with pointing dogs. Quails were counted at each site, and were particularly found in pine-oak ecosystems with a population density of 0.0466 quail/ha in forest areas and 0.00089 quail/ha in range lands. Population density (quail/ha) by county was: 0.1420 in Aculco; 0.2283 in Almoloya de Juarez; 0.1071 in Atlacomulco; 0.2044 in Ixtlahuaca; 0.1363 in Morelos; 0.2777 in San Felipe del Progreso, and 0.1250 in Temascalcingo. This study is the first population estimate of the Montezuma quail in the State of Mexico in Mexico.
REFERENCES
1. Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca. Programa de conservación de la vida silvestre y diversificación productiva en el sector rural 1997-2000. México (DF): INE-SEMARNAP, 1997.
2. Valadez MF. Religión y domesticación animal en Mesoamérica. Vet Méx 1994;25:303-308.
3. Márquez MA. Las aves del códice Florentino. Vet Méx 1995;26:87-93.
4. Leopold AS, McCabe RA. Natural history of the Montezuma quail in México. Condor 1957;59:3-26.
5. Brown DE. Factors influencing reproductive success and population densities in Montezuma quail. J Wildl Mgmt 1979;43:522-526.
6. Herrera HJG, Mendoza MGD, Hernández GA. La ganadería familiar en México. Aguascalientes (Ags): Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, 1998.
7. Wallmo OC. Nesting of mearns quail in southeastern Arizona. Condor 1984;56:125-128.
8. Slobodokin LB. Susceptibility to extinction. New Jersey (NJ): Princeton University, 1986.
9. Alcérreca AC. Fauna silvestre y áreas naturales protegidas. México (DF): Universo Veintiuno, 1988.
10. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Síntesis geográfica, nomenclátor y anexo cartográfico del Estado de México. Aguascalientes (Ags): Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, 1987.
11. Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México. 2a ed. México (DF): Limusa, 1993.
12. Sánchez O. La flora del Valle de México. 6a ed. México (DF): La Prensa, 1984.
13. Thomas L, Laake JL, Derry JF, Buckland ST, Borchers DL, Anderson DR, et al. Distance (computer program). Versión 3.5. Tennessee (Tn): University of St. Andrews, 1998.
14. Graves BM, Dittberner PL. Variables for monitoring aquatic and terrestrial environments. US Fish Wildl Serv Biol Rep 1986;5:34-49.
15. Sutherland WJ. Ecological census techniques. A handbook. Edinburgh (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1999.
16. Drapper N, Smith HD. Applied regression analysis. 2nd ed. London (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
17. SAS Institute. Statistical analysis system (computer program). Version 5. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc., 1985.
18. Yeager WM. Mearn´s quail management information. Project W-53-R-17, work plan. Phoenix (Az): Arizona Game and Fish Department, 1967.
19. Stromberg MR. Habitat, movements and roost characteristics of Montezuma quail in southeastern Arizona. Condor 1990;92:229-236.
20. Albers RP, Gehlbach FR. Choices of feeding habitat by relict Montezuma quail in Central Texas. Wilson Bull 1990;102:300-308.
21. Brown RL. An ecological study of Mearn´s quail. Final report. Project W-78-R-22, WJ1. Phoenix (Az): Arizona Game and Fish Department, 1978.
22. Brown RL. Effects of livestock grazing on mearns quail in southeastern Arizona. J Range Mgmt 1982;35:727-732.
23. Bishop RA, Hungerford CR. Seasonal food selection of Arizona mearns quail. J Wildl Mgmt 1965;4:813-819.
24. Robbins TC. Wildlife feeding and nutrition. 2nd ed. New York (NJ): Academic Press, 1993.
25. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. IUCN red list of threatened animals. Geneve, Switzerland 1996:1-378.
26. Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca. NOM 059 en Ecología. Gaceta Ecol 1995;7:4.
27. Gordillo MA. Codorniz Moctezuma. En: Ceballo G, Márquez VL, editores. Las aves de México en peligro de extinción. México (DF): Consejo Nacional de la Biodiversidad, 2000:152-153.
28. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL. Diario Oficial de la Federación (5 mayo). México (DF): SEDESOL, 1994.
29. Abarca FJ. Programa estratégico para especies en riesgo. Informe final. México (DF): Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, 1998.
30. Boer AJ. Animal agriculture in developing countries: technology dimensions. Morrilton (Ak): Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, 1994.