2002, Number 3
Next >>
Vet Mex 2002; 33 (3)
Nutritional quality of four soybean meals processed in differents states of Mexico
Cortés CA, Celis GA, Ávila GE, Morales BE
Language: English/Spanish
References: 20
Page: 209-217
PDF size: 71.12 Kb.
ABSTRACT
In order to evaluate the nutritional quality of four Mexican soybean meals from the states of Guanajuato, Veracruz, Hidalgo and Nuevo Leon in Mexico, two experiments were conducted. Previously to the experiments, meals were analyzed, resulting to be within standards for crude protein, amino acid profile, urease activity and protein solubility. Data obtained in experiment one, in which soybean meals were used as a protein source in sorghum + soybean meal diets for broilers during 42 days, indicated that for weight gain (2 057, 2 004, 2 078 and 1 978 g), feed consumption (3 860, 3 763, 3 666 and 3 498 g) and feed conversion (1.87, 1.88, 1.76 and 1.77) there were no differences (P ‹ 0.05) among the four meals. In experiment two, True Metabolizable Energy (TME) was determined in Leghorn roosters by using a precise feeding method with the four soybean meals. Results were 2 450, 2 384, 2 430 and 2 290 kcal/kg with a mean of 2 388 kcal/kg, without differences (P ‹ 0.05) among meals, and showed no statistical difference of the nutritional value among the four sources of soybean meal used regarding broiler performance and determination of the TME.
REFERENCES
1. Cuca GM, Ávila GE, Pró MA. Alimentación de las aves. 8a ed. Chapingo, Edo. de México: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 1996.
2. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. Washington (DC): National Academy Press, 1994.
3. Fernandez SR, Parsons CM. Bioavailability of digestible lysine in heat-damaged soybean meal for chick growth. Poultry Sci 1996;75:224-231.
4. Fernandez SR, Zhang Y, Parsons CM. Determination of protein solubility in oilseed meals using coomassie blue dye binding. Poultry Sci 1993;72:1925-1930.
5. Balloun SL. Soybean meal in poultry nutrition. St Louis (Mo): American Soybean Association, 1980.
6. Bustillo PR. Determinación de la calidad nutritiva de pastas de soya y soya integral mediante pruebas de laboratorio y biológicas en pollos de engorda y gallos Leghorn (tesis de maestría). Chapingo, Edo. de México, México: Colegio de Postgraduados, 1989.
7. Batal AB, Douglas MW, Engram AE, Parsons CM. Protein dispersibility index as an indicator of adequately processed soybean meal. Poultry Sci 2000;79:1592-1596.
8. McNaughton JM, Reece FN, Deaton JW. Relationships between color, trypsin inhibitor contents, urease index of soybean meal and effects on broiler performance. Poultry Sci 1981;60:393-400.
9. Waldroup PW, Ramsey BE, Helwig HM, Smith NK. Optimum processing for soybean meal used in broiler diets. Poultry Sci 1985;64:2314-2320.
10. Araba M, Dale NM. Evaluation of KOH solubility as an indicator of overprocessing soybean meal. Poultry Sci 1990;69:76-83.
11. Araba M, Dale NM. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of underprocessing of soybean meal. Poultry Sci 1990;69:1749-1752.
12. Parsons CM, Hashimoto K, Wedekind KJ, Baker DH. Soybean protein solubility and potassium hydroxide: an in vitro test of in vivo protein quality. J Anim Sci 1991;69:2918-2924.
13. Anderson-Hafermann JC, Zhang Y, Parsons CM, Hymowitz T. Effect of heating on nutritional quality of conventional and Kunitz trypsin inhibitor-free soybeans. Poultry Sci 1992;71:1700-1709.
14. Tejada de Hernández I. Control de calidad y análisis de alimentos para animales. 2a ed. México (DF): Sistema de Educación Continua en Producción Animal A.C., 1992.
15. Gill JL. Design and analysis of experiments in the animal and sciences. Vol. 1 Ames (Io): The Iowa State University Press, 1978.
16. Sibbald IR. Bioavailable amino acids and true metabolizable energy of cereal grains. Poultry Sci 1979;58:934-939.
17. Fasina Y, Classen HL, Garlich JD. Effect of autoclave heat treatment on soybean lectin concentration, urease activity and trypsin inhibitor activity. 88th Annual Meeting; 1999 August 8-11; Springdale (Ar). Springdale (Ar): Poultry Science Association, Inc., 1999:12.
18. Cheftel JC, Cuq JL, Lorient D. Proteínas alimentarias: bioquímica. Propiedades funcionales. Valor nutritivo. Modificaciones químicas. Zaragoza, España: Acribia, 1989.
19. Gatel F. Protein quality of legume seeds for non-ruminant animals: a literature review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1994;45:317-348.
20. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington (DC): Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1990.