Aguilar FG, González CBG, Bernal RN, Torres AÓ, Monares ZE, Aguirre SJ, Camarena AG, Franco GJ

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 22-26
PDF size: 185.71 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by increased permeability of the alveolar capillary membrane, diffuse alveolar damage and proteinaceous pulmonary edema; the central objective of mechanical ventilation in ARDS is to minimize any further damage while adequate gas exchange maintaining and clinical status that triggered resets; despite widespread knowledge gained regarding the etiology and pathophysiology of ARDS, the feasibility and reproducibility of the current definition, of the packages set for early and optimal treatment have established consensus on severity scales and based on these achieve clinical improvement in the short and medium term outcomes, overall mortality is still between 40-60%, depending on prognostic factors.

REFERENCES

1. Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L. The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1573-1582.

2. Ware LB. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1334-1350.

3. The ARDS Definition Task Force. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-2533.

4. Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A, Brower RG, Talmor D, Walter SD, et al. Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;303(9):865-873.

5. Cooke CR. A simple clinical predictive index for objective estimates of mortality in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1913-1920.

6. ARDS Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for ALI and ARDS. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301-1308.

7. Natalini G. Cardiac index and oxygen delivery during low and high tidal volume ventilation strategies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a crossover randomized clinical trial. Crit Care. 2013;17:R146.

8. Guérin C. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(23):2159-2168.

9. Chiumello D. Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure in mild, moderate, and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:252-264.

10. Meade MO. Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:637-645.

11. Higher vs Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis JAMA 2010; 303.

12. Gattinoni L, et al. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 1775-1786.

13. Siddiki H, et al. Bedside quantification of dead-space fraction using routine clinical data in patients with acute lung injury: secondary analysis of two prospective trials. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R141.