Mena RM, Rodríguez-Mota E

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 193-198
PDF size: 127.42 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The pre-anesthetic evaluation (PAE), aims to evaluate a patient in order to establish, together with surgeons, benefitrisk of a determined intervention, propose and initiate treatment, as well as informing the patient and obtaining your consent in relation to the suggested procedure. The PAE is mandatory and has demonstrated its importance in clinical, economic and organizational levels. Anamnesis and physical examination are the core of the practice of the PAE. Complementary tests and the specialized consultations are decided based on the clinical elements and to the many existing recommendations. The anesthetic medical history sheet should include all the elements of the evaluation. The correct presentation of this road is part of the quality indicators considered by health authorities that are applied to the evaluation of health centres. The consultation of anesthesia is a multifacetic activity and a regulatory obligation. Is to be considered as a major element of the safety of anesthetic care.

REFERENCES

1. Lee JA. The anaesthetic out-patient clinic. Anaesthesia 1949; 4: 169-74. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1949.tb05837.x/abstract

2. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-006-SSA3-2011, para la práctica de la Anestesiología. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología 2012; 35(2): 140-52.

3. Kluger MT, Tham EJ, Coelman NA, Runciman WB, Bullock FM. Inadequate pre-operative evaluation end preparation: a review of 197 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 1173-8.

4. Fleisher LA, Chair JA, Beckman, Keneth A, Brown, Calkins H, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2008; 16(3): 685-712.

5. Guidance on the provision of anaesthesia services for Preoperative Care. Guidelines for the Provision of Anaesthetic Services: The Royal College of Anaesthetists 2009. Disponible en: www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/GPAS-Preop.pdf

6. Hepner DL, Bader AM, Hurwitz S, Gusrafson M, Tsen LC. Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2004; 98: 1099-105.

7. Fischer SP. Cost-effective preoperative evaluation and testing. Chest 1999; 115(Suppl. 2): 96S-100S.

8. Lienhart A, Bricard H. Les consultations préanesthésiques délocalisées et consultations préanesthésiques pour anesthésies itératives et rapprochées. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2001; 20: fi 166-8.

9. Ausset S, Bouaziz H, Brosseau M, Kinirons B, Benhamou D. Improvement of information gained from the pre-anaesthetic visit through a quality-assurance programme. Br J Anaesthesia 2002; 88: 280-3.

10. Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, Chaitman B, Eckel R. Fleg J, et al. Excercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2001; 104: 1694-740.

11. Chassot PG, Delabays A, Spahn DR. Preoperative evaluations of patients with, or at risk of coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesthesia 2002; 89(5): 747-59.

12. Dolgin M. New York Heart Association. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vesels. Boston: Little Brown; 1994.

13. Ramachandran SK, Kheterpal S, Consens F, Shanks A, Doherty TM, Morris M. et al. Derivation and validation of a simple perioperative sleep apnea prediction score. Anaesthesia & Analgesia 2010; 110: 1007-15.

14. Diemunsch P, Langeron O, Richard M, Lenfant F. Prédiction et définition de la ventilation au masque difficile et de l’intubation difficile: Question 1. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2008; 27: 3-14.

15. Bernard R, Benhamou D, Beloeil H. Prescription des examens biologiques préopératoires: audit des practiques dans un hôpital universitaire et mise en place de recommendations locales. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2010; 29: 868-73.

16. ASA Physical Status Classification System. Disponible en: www.asahq.org/clinical/Physicalstatus.htm).

17. Mora GD. Valoración de Riesgo Anestésico Mora-México: Una propuesta Razonada de Evidencias. Anestesia en México 2005; 17(1).

18. Halaszynski TM, Juda R, Silverman DG. Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management. Crit Care Med 2004; 32(Suppl.): S76-S86.

19. Kennedy JM, van Rjj AM, Spears GF, Pettigrew RA, Tucker IG. Polypharmacy in a general surgical unit and consequences of drug withdrawal. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49: 353-62.

20. Chambrier C. Support nutritionnel préopératoire: qui, quand, comment? Nutr Clin Metabol 2005; 19: 106-10.

21. Lucas-Polomeni M-M, Rochefort-Morel C, Delaval Y. Bilan allergologique lors de la consultation de préanesthésie: pour qui? Comment? Prat Anesth Reanim 2008; 12: 158-66.

22. Lienhart A. Changes in transfusion practice for surgery. Transfusion clinique et biologique. J Soc Fr Transfus Sang 2007; 14: 533-37.

23. Cote Ch. Anestesia en Pediatría. 2a Ed. Interamericana McGraw-Hill; 1994.

24. Bell Ch. Manual de Anestesia Pediátrica. 2a ed. Harcourt Brace; 1998.

25. Maxwell L. Problemas relacionados con la edad, en valoración, pruebas y planificación preoperatorias: pacientes pediátricos. Clínicas de Anestesiología de Norteamérica. McGraw-Hill 1/2004; p. 25-39.