medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2015; 19 (1)

In vitro assessment of root canal leakage of two post-endodontic reconstruction systems

Merlín MDE, Williams VR, Barceló SF

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 38-42
PDF size: 354.82 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to assess the degree of microleakage observed when using two different post-endodontic reconstruction systems; this was achieved assessing penetration of a dye along restorations performed with endodontic posts and dual-cure resin cements. For the present study, 30 extracted, single rooted premolars were used. Root canal treatment was performed on the teeth which were later stored in bi-distilled water at 37 oC. Teeth were randomly allotted to three groups, all groups were comprised of 10 teeth. In two groups, post cementation was performed using the systems RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE dental products) and Parapost (Coltene-Whaledent). Samples were subjected to thermo-cycling and later immersed in methylene blue for seven days at 36 oC. After this, samples were subjected to a diaphanization process and were then analyzed under a microscope; penetration in millimeters was thus obtained. Results revealed that teeth treated with Parapost system exhibited lesser microleakage. Control group experienced the greater amounts of microleakage. Statistical analysis conducted with Donett test showed statistically significant difference between Parapost and RelyX systems. Conclusion: Parapost reconstruction system (Coltene-Whaledent) with acid-etch technique exhibited lower microleakage values. Results were statistically significant when compared to those obtained with the RelyX reconstruction system (3M ESPE dental products).


REFERENCES

  1. Rogić-Barbić M, Segović S, Pezelj-Ribarić S, Borcić J, Jukić S, Anić I. Microleakage along Glassix glass fibre posts cemented with three different materials assessed using a fluid transport system. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 363-367.

  2. Jung SH. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 270-276.

  3. Andreza R, Talaveira da Silva. Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 355-362.

  4. Bitter K. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent. 2007; 20 (6): 353-360.

  5. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2003; 28 (5): 647-660.

  6. Ravanshad S, Ghoreeshi N. An in vitro study of coronal microlekage in endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. Aust Endod J. 2003; 29 (3): 128-133

  7. Silikas N, Kavvadia K, Eliades G, Watts D. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach. Am J Dent. 2005; 18 (2): 95-100.

  8. Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod. 1998; 11: 703-708.

  9. Zicaria F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naerta I, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 967-977.

  10. Moradi S, Naghavi N. Evaluation of microleakage following application of a dentin bonding agent as root canal sealer in the presence or absence of smear leayer. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51 (2): 207-213.

  11. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod. 2003; 29 (2): 125-131.

  12. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater. 2002; 18 (7): 495-502.

  13. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27 (2): 89-99.

  14. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevancy. International Endodontic Journal. 1993; 26: 37-43.

  15. Macchi RL, Capurro MA, Herrera CL, Cebada FR, Kohen S. Influence of endodontic materials on the bonding of composite resin to dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1992; 8: 26-29.

  16. Fogel HM. Microleakage of posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1995; 7: 376-379.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com