medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2014; 5 (2)

Placement of dental implants in upper anterior sector in a teenage patient. Case report

Hernández RC, Chapa AG, Llamosa CL

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 56-59
PDF size: 290.75 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The criteria for success for implants in the esthetic zone involve the achievement of a soft tissue contour with an intact interproximal papilla and a gingival outline that is harmonious with the gingival silhouette of the adjacent healthy dentition. In the case of two missing adjacent teeth, the bone condition is in most cases compromised because the characteristic interdental bone peak is missing, for this reason, augmentation procedures are required to enable reliable implant placement in a location favorable for prosthodontic rehabilitation. The placement of two adjacent implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla is still considered a treatment in which it is difficult to establish a predictable harmonious result.


REFERENCES

  1. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19 (Suppl): 43-61.

  2. Kumari S. Dental implant in children and adolescents. Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry. 2010; 1 (Issue 1): 50-54.

  3. Mankani N, Chowdhary R, Patil BA, Nagaraj E, Madalli P. Osseointegrated dental implants in growing children: a literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(5):627-31.

  4. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25 (2): 113-119.

  5. Funato A, Salama MA, Ishikawa T, Garber DA et al. Timing, positioning, and sequential staging in esthetic implant therapy: a four-dimensional perspective. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27 (4): 313-323.

  6. Su H, González-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30 (4): 335-343.

  7. Tymstra N, Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Raghoebar GM et al. Treatment outcome and patient satisfaction with two adjacent implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30 (3): 307-316.

  8. Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20011; 22 (2): 207-213.

  9. Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalá-Torres M et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29 (2): 141-151.

  10. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac. 2009; 24 (Suppl.): 237-259.

  11. Park JB. Immediate implantation with ridge augmentation using acellular dermal matrix and deproteinized bovine bone: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 37 (6): 717-721.

  12. Resnik RR, Misch C. Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in oral implantology: rationale and protocol. Implant Dent. 2008; 17 (2): 142-150.

  13. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J et al. The role of bone decortication in enhancing the results of guided bone regeneration: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2009; 80 (2): 175-189.

  14. Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J et al. Flap advancement: practical techniques to attain tension-free primary closure. J Periodontol. 2009; 80 (1): 4-15.

  15. Block MS, Jackson WC. Techniques for grafting the extraction site in preparation for dental implant placement. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2006; 14 (1): 1-25.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com