medigraphic.com
ISSN 2078-7170 (Electronic)

2012, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

CorSalud 2012; 4 (4)

Anesthetic management of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Preliminary study

de Arazoza HA, Rodríguez SFL, Rodríguez RE, Fernández MA, Carrasco MMÁ, Valdés DO

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 246-253
PDF size: 132.24 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction and objective: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery offers many advantages for high-risk patients, but the difficulties of these procedures do not only depend on the surgical technique, but on the anesthetic management, which is a challenge for the cardiovascular anesthesiologist. The objective of this research was to demonstrate the feasibility of the anesthetic management for videoassisted surgical techniques designed at Cardiocentro CIMEQ, and to compare the behavior of some variables in two study groups. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent heart surgery in the past three years at Cardiocentro CIMEQ. They were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique used. Patients operated using conventional cardiac surgery (median sternotomy) were included in group 1, and those with minimally invasive cardiac surgery were included in group 2, to whom an anesthetic technique designed for this purpose was used. Results: The anesthetic, surgical, extracorporeal circulation and aortic clamping time and the number of units of transfused red blood cells per patient was significantly lower in the videoassisted cardiac surgery group. The stay in the Intensive Care Unit and in the cardiology department was similar, and so was the onset of walking and postoperative complications. Conclusions: The anesthesia management with this work protocol is safe and feasible. Patients operated with this technique have a very good recovery, few postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stays. In addition, it is a good choice for high-risk patients in need of surgery, which do not meet the criteria for percutaneous treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Iribarne A, Karpenko A, Russo MJ, Cheema FH, Umann T, Oz MC, et al. Eight-year experience with minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. World J Surg. 2010;34(4):611-5.

  2. Santos BF, Hungness ES. Natural orifice translu-menal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(13):1655-65.

  3. Iribarne A, Russo MJ, Moskowitz AJ, Ascheim DD, Brown LD, Gelijns AC. Assessing technological change in cardiothoracic surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;21(1):28-34.

  4. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folligue T, et al. Guía de práctica clínica sobre re-vascularización miocárdica 2da. edición corregida el 10 de mayo de 2011. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63(12): 1485.e1-e76.

  5. de Arazoza Hernández A, Rodríguez Salgueiro FL, Carrasco Molina MA, Valdés Dupeirón O, Rodrí-guez Rosales E. Conducción anestésica de la re-vascularización miocárdica video asistida. Reporte de cinco casos. CorSalud [Internet]. 2011;3(2):107-11. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/cors/pdf/2011/v3n2a11/conduccion.pdf

  6. de Arazoza Hernández A, Rodríguez Salgueiro FL, Fernández Molina A, Carrasco Molina MA, Rodrí-guez Rosales E, Ojeda Mollinedo O. Conducción anestésica de la sustitución valvular mínimamente invasiva. Primeros casos en Cuba. CorSalud. 2011; 3(3):177-82. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/cors/pdf/2011/v3n3a11/conduccion2.pdf

  7. Vistarini N, Aiello M, Mattiucci G, Alloni A, Cattadori B, Tinelli C, et al. Port-access minimally invasive surgery for atrial septal defects: A 10-year single center experience in 166 patients. J Thorac Cardio-vasc Surg. 2010;139(1):139-45.

  8. López-Gude MJ, García-Sáez D, Forteza A, Pérez de la Sota E, Centeno J, Cortina JM, et al. Heart Port™ access technique for valvular surgery. Cir Cardiov. 2010;17(4):345-50.

  9. Jegaden O, Wautot F, Sassard T, Szymanik I, Sha-fy A, Lapeze J, et al. Is there an optimal minimally invasive technique for left anterior descending co-ronary artery bypass? J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:37.

  10. Raanani E, Spiegelstein D, Sternik L, Preisman S, Moshkovitz Y, Smolinsky AK, et al. Quality of mitral valve repair: median sternotomy versus port-access approach.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(1): 86-90.

  11. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Chan EY, Yang J, Soni L, Russo MJ, et al. The golden age of minimally in-vasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives. Future Cardiol. 2011;7(3):333-46.

  12. Mack MJ. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(Suppl 2):S488-92.

  13. Sostaric M, Gersak B, Novak-Jankovic V. Early extubation and fast-track anesthetic technique for endoscopic cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 2010;13(3):190-4.

  14. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56: 455-62.

  15. Tedoriya T. Is the port-access technique really safe as conventional perfusion extracorporeal circulation for all candidates of valve surgery? Circ J. 2011; 75(7):1571-2.

  16. Farhat F, Metton O, Jegaden O. Benefits and com-plications of total sternotomy and ministernotomy in cardiac surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:199-205.

  17. Park WK, Lee JW, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH. Outcomes of Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The Port Access Approach vs. Median Sternotomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;45(1):11-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com