Ramírez-Campos J, Núñez-Velázquez M, Cárdenas-Rojo N, Sevilla-Castillo RA, Palacios-Saucedo GC

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 376-381
PDF size: 58.51 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Interpreting an electroencephalogram (EEG) is a subjective process which involves various obstacles to reach an agreement. If the interobserver agreement of a diagnostic process is poor, that process cannot be considered accurate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra and interobserver agreement of the EEG reading in pediatric patients.
Methods: 108 EEGs of children under 16 years of age were included. EEGs were interpreted by two pediatric neurologists. Observer number one performed three readings on three different moments to assess intraobserver agreement, while the third reading was blind for the diagnosis. Interobserver agreement was assessed with a single blind reading for the diagnosis of the two observers. Agreement was measured with the kappa index.
Results: Intraobserver agreement to differentiate if the EEG was normal or abnormal was substantial when the three readings were compared (kappa index: 0.66-0.78). The highest agreement rate corresponded to the readings of those who had knowledge of the diagnosis. The interobserver agreement assessing between abnormal or normal EEG was slight (k = 0.12).
Conclusions: Since the EEG is a subjective interpreter dependent study, it is necessary to establish a consensus to standardize the criteria for its interpretation in order to increase the interobserver agreement.

REFERENCES

1. Suástegui-Román RA, Garza-Morales S, Espinosa- Montero R, Pérez-Ramírez M, Aveleyra-Ojeda E. Utilidad y costo del electroencefalograma. Experiencia de1000 casos en un hospital de tercer nivel en México. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2007;64:171-81.

2. Ramos-Argüelles F, Morales G, Egozcue S, Pabón RM, Alonso MT. Técnicas básicas de electroencefalografía: principios y aplicaciones clínicas. Anales Sis San Navarra. 2009;32:69-82.

3. Cosenza ME, Alves SV. Non-epileptiform EEG abnormalities: an overview. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011; 69:829-35.

4. Van Donselaar CA, Stroink H, Arts WF. How confi - dent are we of the diagnosis of epilepsy? Epilepsia. 2006;47:9-13.

5. Gilbert DL, Sethuraman G, Kotagal U, Buncher C. Meta-analysis of EEG test performance shows wide variation among studies. Neurology. 2003;60:564-70.

6. Malone A, Ryan CA, Fitzgerald A, Burgoyne L, Connolly S, Boylang B. Interobserver agreement in neonatal seizure identifi cation. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2097-101.

7. Ferrie CD. Preventing misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:206-9.

8. Khreisat WH. Clinical indications of electroencephalogram in children. MEJFM. 2012;10:13-9.

9. Benbadis SR, LaFrance WC, Papandonatos GD, Korabathina K, Lin K, Kraemer HC. Interrater reliability of EEG-video monitoring. Neurology. 2009; 73:843-6.

10. Si Y, Gotman J, Pasupathy A, Flanagan D, Rosenblatt B, Gottesman RD. An expert system for EEG monitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;106:488-500.

11. Blumstein MD, Friedman MJ. Childhood seizures. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2007;25(4):1061-86.

12. Benbadis SR, Lin K. Errors in EEG interpretation and misdiagnosis of epilepsy Which EEG patterns are overread? Eurneurol. 2008;59: 267-71.

13. Abendn NS, Gutierrez-Colina A, Zhao H, Guo R, Marsh E, Clancy RR, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of electroencephalogram interpretation in critically ill children. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;28:15-9.

14. Ronner HE, Ponten SC, Stam CJ. Uitdehaag BM. Inter-observer variability of the eeg diagnosis of seizures in comatose patients. Seizure 2009;18:257-63.

15. Piccinelli P, Viri M, Zucca C, Borgatti R, Romeo A, Giordano L, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the EEG reading in patients with childhood idiopathic epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2005;66:195-8.

16. Gilbert DL. Interobserver reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms in children with newly diagnosed seizures. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:1009-10; author reply 1010-1.

17. Lee WC, Man SS, Lau KW, Cheng LC, Kwong NS, Kwong KL. Uses and abuses of paediatric electroencephalography. Hong Kong Med J. 2012;18:25-9.

18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.

19. Stroink H, Schimsheimer RJ, Weerd AW de, Geerts AT, Arts WF, Peeters EA, et al. Interobserver reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms in children with newly diagnosed seizures. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006; 48: 374-7.

20. Azuma H, Hori S, Nakanishi M, Fujimoto S, Ichikawa N, Furukawa TA. An intervention to improve the interrater realiability of clinical EEG interpretations. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003;57:485-9.

21. Vignatelli L, Bisulli F, Provini F, Naldi I, Pittau F, Zaniboni A, et al. Interobserver reliability of video recording in the diagnosis of nocturnal frontal lobe seizures. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1506-11.