medigraphic.com
ISSN 1684-1824 (Electronic)

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Méd Electrón 2014; 36 (3)

Auto-evaluation and co-evaluation. Experience with fourth-year students of the Medicine career in Pediatrics matter

Vidal TLA, Noda AA, Báez PE, Fernández MJ, Montell HO, Rodríguez DE

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page:
PDF size: 53.56 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Nowadays it is difficult conceptually rebutting auto-evaluation and co-evaluation if taking into account the arguments laying in their bases and the advantages derived from them. The aim of this work was exposing the experience of putting into practice auto-evaluation and co-evaluation in the evaluative process of fourth-year students of Medicine. We carried out a qualitative-focused research in the Teaching Provincial Pediatric Hospital Eliseo Noel Caamaño, of Matanzas. We worked with a universe of students formed by the students of the six groups of medicine (175), who spent their 20-weeks sub-practice in the miscellaneous service, during 2011-2012 school year. In the course of the first teaching activity they were explained how auto-evaluation and co-evaluation will be put into practice. At the end of the practice, their criteria were measured using the positive/negative/interesting technique. The considerations of students and professors were collected in a group interview. From the students' point of view it was considered positive: feeling motivated because they were active part in the process and more engaged; interesting: highlighting the professors' positive attitude in relation with teaching; and negative: they agreed that not every professor reached a good communicational level. From the part of the professors' staff, they considered that this method application allowed them working in a more effective way in the formation of values and arriving to a predictive diagnosis of the possible final goals to achieve at the end of the matter program. The introduction of auto-evaluation and co-evaluation in the evaluative process was gladly accepted with positive results by students as well as by the professors' staff.


REFERENCES

  1. Blanco Aspiazú M Á, Rodríguez Collar T L, Blanco Aspiazú O, Hernández Díaz L. Enfermedades de la evaluación. Educ Med Sup [Internet]. 2013 [citado 23 Jul 2013];27(2):249-58. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864- 21412013000200012&script=sci_arttext

  2. Salas Perea RS. Educación en salud. Competencia y desempeño profesionales. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 1999.

  3. González Pérez M. Evaluación del aprendizaje en la enseñanza Universitaria. Rev Pedagogía Universitaria. 2000;5(2).

  4. Bordás MI, Cabrera F. Estrategias de evaluación de los aprendizajes centrados en el proceso. Rev Española de Pedagogía. 2001;4988(1):218-25.

  5. Dochy F, Segers MY, Sluijmans D. The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: a review. Studies in Higher [Internet]. 1999 [citado 23 Jul 2013];24(3). Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079912331379935

  6. López Noguero AF. Metodología participativa en la enseñanza universitaria. Madrid: Narcea; 2005.

  7. Slavin RE. Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.

  8. King PE, Behnke RR. Problems associates with evaluating student performances in groups. College Teaching [Internet]. 2005 [citado 23 Jul 2013];53(2). Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/CTCH.53.2.57-61

  9. Gupta ML. Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education [Internet]. 2004 [citado 23 Jul 2013];29(1). Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0260293032000158162

  10. Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education [Internet]. 1999 [citado 23 Jul 2013];24(4). Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0260293990240405

  11. Estrada J. Relación entre prácticas docentes y el nivel de aprendizaje autodirigido en estudiantes de Medicina Rev Educ Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2013 [citado 23 Jul 2013];10(2). Disponible en:http://www2.udec.cl/ofem/recs/anteriores/vol1022013/artinv10213f.pdf

  12. García JV, Pérez MC. Espacio Europeo de la Educación Superior, competencias profesionales y empleabilidad. Rev Iberoamericana Educación [Internet]. 2008 [citado 23 Jul 2013];46(9). Disponible en:http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/2444Manjon.pdf

  13. Garcia A, Gines J, Vila LE. The Rewards of Human Capital Competences for Young European Higher Education. Tertiary Education and Management [Internet]. 2004 [citado 23 Jul 2013];10(4). Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13583883.2004.9967133

  14. Cotton K. Developing Employability Skills [Internet]. Northwest Regional Educational Research Laboratory; 2001 [citado 23 Jul 2013]. Disponible en: www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/8/c015.html

  15. Heijke H, Meng C, Ris C. Fitting to the Job: The Role of Generic and Vocational Competencies in Adjustment and Performance. Labour Economics [Internet]. 2003 [citado 23 Jul 2013];10(2):215-29. Disponible en:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537103000137

  16. Yorke M. Employability in Higher Education: What it is-what it is not. New York: LTSN Generic Centre/ESECT; 2004.

  17. Brigde S, O’Neill K, Cromie S. Understanding Enterprise, Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2009.

  18. Olmo S, Rodríguez J. Diseño del proceso de evaluación de los estudiantes universitarios españoles: ¿responde a una evaluación por competencia en el Espacio Europeo de la Educación Superior? Rev Iberoamericana de Educación [Internet]. 2010 [citado 23 Jul 2013];53(1). Disponible en:http://www.rieoei.org/deloslectores/3757Olmos.pdf

  19. Cano, E. La evaluación por competencias en la educación superior. Profesorado [Internet]. 2008 [citado 1 Ene 2013];12(3). Disponible en: http://www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev123COL1.pdf

  20. Escudero T. ¿Se puede evaluar los centros educativos y los profesores? ICE: Universidad de Zaragoza; 1980.

  21. Ibarra Saiz MS, Rodríguez G. El trabajo colaborativo en las aulas universitarias reflexiones desde la autoevaluación. Rev Educación [Internet]. 2007 [citado 1 Ene 2013];344:355-59. Disponible en:http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re344/re344_15.pdf

  22. Reynolds M, Trehan K. Assessment: a critical perspective. Studies in Higher Education [Internet]. 2000 [citado 1 Ene 2013];25(3):267-78. Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070050193406

  23. Ibarra Saiz MS, Rodríguez Gómez G. El trabajo colaborativo en las aulas universitarias reflexiones desde la autoevaluación. Revista de Educación. 2007;344:355-59.

  24. Arteaga Herrera JJ. El aprendizaje por competencia en medicina: un nuevo enfoque. Edumecentro [Internet]. 2009 [citado 1 Ene 2013];1(1). Disponible en:http://www.revedumecentro.sld.cu/index.php/edumc/article/viewArticle/17

  25. Giacomantone O, Suárez IB. Profesionalismo médico, su relación con la educación médica del siglo XXI. Educación Médica Permanente [Internet]. 2009 [citado 1 Ene 2013];1(1). Disponible en:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8517




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com