medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2013; 26 (3)

Miragel implant, apropos of 3 cases

Rodríguez RB, García FL, Cheong QM, Gallar GY, Pozo CS

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 508-515
PDF size: 276.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The long-term consequences of the use of Miragel implant as treatment of retinal detachment were set forth in this article. The characteristics of the Mirage explant during surgery and postoperatively in three cases, who went to the retinal service of "Amistad Algeria-Cuba" ophthalmological hospital in Djelfa, Democratic People's Republic of Algeria, were presented. They had been operated on by conventional retinal surgery and implanted a Mirage implant in France in the first half of the 90's. The predominant symptom was discomfort due to limited eye movements. Two cases presented with implant exposure and periocular sepsis. The implants were removed from the three patients; they fragmented very easily and made their extraction difficult in addition to marked muscular distension. The latter gradually disappeared and the eye movements were recovered in the postoperative phase.


REFERENCES

  1. Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D. Strategy for the Management of Uncomplicated Retinal Detachments: The European Vitreo-Retinal Society Retinal Detachment Study Report 1. Ophthalmology. 2013; S0161-6420(13)00116-4. [Epub ahead of print]

  2. Soni C, Hainsworth DP, Almony A. Surgical Management of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1440-7.

  3. Refojo MF, Natchiar G, Lui HS. New hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling. Ann Ophthalmol. 1980;12:88-92.

  4. Ho PC, Chan IM, Refojo MF, Tolentino FI. The MAI hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling: a review. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15(6)1-5.

  5. Tolentino FI, Roldan M, Nasssif J, Refojo MF. Hydrogel implant for scleral buckling: long-term observations. Retina 1985;5(1)-41.

  6. Roldan-Pollares M, Castillo Sanz JL, Alwad El-Susi S. Long term complications of silicone and hydrogel explants in retinal reattachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(2):197-201.

  7. Das T, Namperumalsamy P. Scleral buckling with hydrogel implant. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991;39(2):41-3.

  8. Marin JF, Tolentino FI, Refojo MF. Long term complications of the MAI hydrogel intrascleral buckling implant. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(1):86-8.

  9. Oshitari K, Hida T, Okada AA. Long-term complications of hydrogel buckles. Retina. 2003;23(2):25761.

  10. Kearney JJ, Lahey JM, Borirakchanyavat S. Complications of hydrogel explants used in scleral buckling surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):96-100.

  11. Ginat DT, Singh AD, Moonis G. Multimodality imaging of hydrogel scleral buckles. Retina. 2012;32(8):1449-52.

  12. Kawano T, Doi M, Miyamura M, Esaki K, Sasoh M, Uji Y. Extrusion and fragmentation of hydrogel exoplant 11 years after scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33(3):240-42.

  13. Lanea JL, Randalla JG, Campeaua NG, Overlanda PK, McCannela CA, Matsko TA. Imaging of Hydrogel Episcleral Buckle Fragmentation as a Late Complication After Retinal Reattachment Surgery. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2001;22(6):1199-1202.

  14. Leibovitch I, Crompton J, Selva D. New onset diplopia: 14 years after retinal detachment surgery with a hydrogel scleral buckle. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(5):640.

  15. Hwang KI, Lim JL. Hydrogel explant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:12056.

  16. Gribomont AC. Progressive deterioration of episcleral Miragel explants. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol. 1999;271:579.

  17. Roldán-Pallarés M, Hernández-Montero J, Llanes F, Fernández-Rubio JE, Ortega F. MIRAgel: hydrolytic degradation and long-term observations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(4):511-4.

  18. Eun JCh, Hyun SO, Sung ChL, , Oh WK. Diplopia and Periorbital Mass Associated with Miragel Buckling Explant. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2004 ;18:47-51.

  19. Shields CL, Demirci H, Marr BP, Mashayekhi A, Materin MA, Shields JA. Expanding MIRAgel scleral buckle simulating an orbital tumor in four cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(1):32-8.

  20. Lane JI, Watson RE Jr, Witte RJ, McCannel CA. Retinal Detachment: Imaging of Surgical Treatments and Complications. Radiographics. 2003;23:983-94.

  21. Li k, Lim KS, Wong D. Miragel explant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery. Eye. 2003;17:248-50.

  22. Le Rouic JF, Bejjani RA, Azan F, Bettembourg O, Renard G, Chauvaud D. Cryoextraction of episcleral Miragel buckle elements: a new technique to reduce fragmentation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33(3):237-9.

  23. Le Rouic JF, Bettembourg OD, Hermies F. Episcleral Miragel buckling elements removal: a clinical case-series. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2002;25:1002-6.

  24. Bernardino CR, Mihora LD, Fay AM, Rubin PA. Orbital complications of hydrogel scleral buckles. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(3):206-8.

  25. Metz HS, Rose S, Burkat C. Late-onset progressive strabismus associated with a hydrogel scleral buckle. J AAPOS. 2004;8(1):72-3.

  26. Hida T, Oshitari K. Long-term complications of MIRAgel exoplants in scleral buckling surgery. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2003;107(2):71-5.

  27. Kearney JJ, Lahey JM, Borirakchanyavat S, Schwartz DM, Wilson D, Tanaka SC, et al. Complications of hydrogel explants used in scleral buckling surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):96-100.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com