medigraphic.com

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2014; 52 (2)

Menopause and ultrasonographic measurements of calcaneus

López-Caudana AE, Castillo-Calderón MG, Ávila-Jiménez L

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 144-149
PDF size: 73.27 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: In Mexico, calcaneal ultrasound measurements —bone mineral density (BMD), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), ultrasonic quantitative index (QUI)— and their differences in regards to menopause have not been documented.
Methods: It was carried out a cross-sectional study in 862 women from 20 to 90 years old, incorporated through consecutive sample, who were users of the Sistema para el Desarrollo Integral de la Familia (DIF) in Morelos. Sociodemographic, reproductive and life style factors were identifi ed. BMD, BUA, SOS and QUI were measured with quantitative ultrasound (QUS), using a Sunlight Omnisense 7000 S device. Adjusted differences in the mean of these measurements were estimated between pre and postmenopausal women through multiple linear regression.
Results: The medians were: BMD, 0.455 g/cm2 (IQR, interquartile range = 0.378, 0.538); BUA, 66.0 dB/mHz (IQR = 54.3, 78.1); SOS, 1530.7 m/s (IQR = 1509.8, 1551.7); QUI = 83.7 units (IQR = 71.1, 96.6). In postmenopausal women, adjusted mean for BUA was –4.34 dB/mHz (CI 95 % = –8.23,–0.43); for SOS, –4.26 m/s (CI 95 % = –13.82, 5.30) ; for QUI, –4.42 units (CI 95 % = –8.64,–0.19).
Conclusions: This report increases information about the clinical applicability of QUS. SOS in calcaneus does not refl ect changes related with menopause.


REFERENCES

  1. Clark MP, Carlos F, Vázquez-Martínez JL. Epidemiología, costos y carga de la osteoporosis en México. Rev Metab Oseo Min. 2010;8(5):152-61.

  2. Lane NE. Epidemiology, etiology and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2 Suppl):S3-11.

  3. Clark P, Carlos F, Barrera C, Guzmán J, Maetzel A, Lavielle P, et al. Direct costs of osteoporosis and hip fracture: An analysis for the Mexican healthcare system. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(3):269-76.

  4. Bonjour JP, Chevalley T, Ferrari S, Rizzoli R. The importance and relevance of peak bone mass in the prevalence of osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(Supl 1):S5-17.

  5. Blake GM, Patel R, Fogelman I. Peripheral or axial bone density measurements? J Clin Densitom. 1998;1(1):55-63.

  6. Knapp KM. Quantitative ultrasound and bone health. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(Supl 1):S18-24.

  7. Cole ZA, Dennison EM, Cooper C. The impact of methods for estimating bone health and the global burden of bone disease. Salud Publica Mex. 2009; 51(Supl 1):S38-S45.

  8. Schurman L, Bagur A, Claus-Hermberg H, Messina OD, Negri A, Sánchez A. Guías para diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento de la osteoporosis. 2007. Rev Argent Osteol. 2007:6(3):27-42.

  9. Maggi S, Kelsey JL, Litvak J, Heyse SP. Incidence of hip fractures in the elderly: A cross-national analysis. Osteoporos Int. 1991;1(4):232-41.

  10. Hans D, Krieg MA. Quantitative ultrasound for the detection and management of osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(Supl 1):S25-37.

  11. Jenkins D. Assessing bone mass with the QUS-2 calcaneal ultrasonometer. Review Series. San Diego CA: Metra Byosystems; 1999. p. 1-8.

  12. Vázquez-Benítez E, Garrido-Latorre F, Mac Gregor C, Tamayo-Orozco J, López-Carrillo L, Parra S, et al. Reproducibilidad de un cuestionario para el estudio del climaterio. Salud Publica Mex. 1996;38(5): 363-70.

  13. Hernández-Ávila JE, González-Ávila L, Rosales- Mendoza E. SNUT. Sistema de evaluación de hábitos nutricionales y consumo de nutrientes (SNUT). Software. Dirección de Informática. Centro de Investigaciones en Salud Poblacional. México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 1998.

  14. Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Tablas de valor nutritivo de los alimentos de mayor consumo en México. México: INCMNSZ; 1996.

  15. Weisberg S. Applied linear regression. Third edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.

  16. Sosa M. Métodos de estudio del hueso. Los ultrasonidos y la ultrasonografía cuantitativa (QUS). En: Riancho-Moral JA, González-Macías J. Manual práctico de osteoporosis y enfermedades del metabolismo mineral. Madrid, España: Jarpyo Editores; 2004. p. 89-92.

  17. Espallargues M, Estrada MD, Parada I, García M, Rovira A. Cribado de la osteoporosis mediante densitometría por ultrasonidos frente a técnicas ionizantes por rayos X. Evaluación de la utilidad clínica y situación de uso en España. Barcelona, España: Agència d’ Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques; 2004.

  18. Nayak S, Olkin I, Llu H, Grabe M, Gould MK, Allen E et al. Meta-analysis: accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. 2006:144(11):832-41.

  19. Huopio J, Kröger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin J, Saarikoski S, Alhava E. Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(4):190-5.

  20. Navas-Cámara FJ, Fernández-de Santiago F, Bayona- Marzo I, Mingo-Gómez T, De la Fuente-Sanz MM, Cacho-del Amo A. Prevalencia de osteoporosis en ancianos institucionalizados, mediante ultrasonografía de calcáneo. An Med Interna (Madrid). 2006;23(8):374-8.

  21. Sosa M, Saavedra P, Muñoz-Torres M, Alegre J, Gómez C, González-Macías J, et al. Quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurements: normative data and precision in the Spanish population. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(6):487-92.

  22. Singer A. Osteoporosis diagnosis and screening. Clin Cornerstone. 2006;8(1):9-18.

  23. Ibáñez R. Técnicas de medida de densidad de masa ósea. An Sis San Navarra. 2003;26(Supl 3): S19-27.

  24. Padierna-Luna JL. Factores de riesgo y prevalencia de osteoporosis. Estudio por ultrasonometría de calcáneo. Med Int Mex. 2008;24(4):278-83.

  25. Creer JR, Otter SJ, Bowen CJ. Use of quantitative ultrasound scans of the calcaneus to diagnose osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007;97(2):108-14.

  26. Cons-Molina F. Métodos de evaluación de la masa ósea para el diagnóstico de osteoporosis. Rev Metab Oseo Min. 2004;2(1):137-46.

  27. Stewart A, Kumar V, Reid DM. Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: A 10-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(3):413-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com