medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2014; 18 (2)

Fluoride release of two glass-ionomer cements: in vitro study

Delgado MCR, Ramírez OJP, Yamamoto NA

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 84-88
PDF size: 231.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the amount of fluoride released by two glass-ionomer cements: Ketac Molar Easymix® (3M ESPE), which has recently appeared in the market and offers the additional advantage of easy mixing, and FUJI II® (GC Dental Industrial Corporation), which has been for a longer time available in the market. Methods: Both materials were handled according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 15 samples were made of each glass ionomer cement using sample molds which measured 4 mm diameter x 6 mm height. Glass ionomer cement was placed into the molds and then pressed. Samples were introduced in an oven (37 ± 1 oC at 90% relative humidity). After one hour had elapsed, samples were withdrawn from the oven and then individually immersed in 1 mL de-ionized water in a hermetically sealed plastic container, to be later stored in a chamber at 37 ± 1 oC. After 24 hours, samples were removed from the chamber and withdrawn from the storing solution, they were then rinsed with deionized water and excess water was removed with blotting paper. Samples were then transferred to another container adding 1 mL deionized water in order to be placed in the oven under the same conditions. Total ionic strength adjustment buffer solution was incorporated into the storing solution for it to be read with the help of a potentiometer (pH-meter) and a fluoride selective electrode for fluoride under magnetic agitation. Prior to conducting fluoride measurements, solutions were prepared in different concentrations in order to establish the calibration curve. The same procedure was performed in the aforementioned manner during the 36 days which the study lasted. Results: Both cements released fluoride. For both cements, highest release was observed during the first 24 hours. Release declined during the second day and kept gradually decreasing with time. Results were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. No statistically significant differences were observed. Conclusions: Both glass ionomer cements exhibited similar fluoride release. Glass ionomer cement are ideal for use in preventive dentistry as well as in atraumatic restorative technique.


REFERENCES

  1. Verbeeck RMH, De Moor RJG, Van Even DFJ, Martens LC. The short-term fluoride release of a hand-mixed versus capsulated system of a restorative glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res. 1993; 72 (3): 577-581.

  2. Botelho M. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement. Car Res. 2003; 37: 108-114.

  3. Dhondt CL, De Maeyer EAP, Verbeek RMH. Fluoride release from glass ionomer activated with fluoride solutions. J Dent Res. 2001; 80 (5): 1402-1406.

  4. Croll P, Nicholson JW. Glas ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24: 423-429.

  5. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 503-508.

  6. Tam L, Chan G, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 1997; 22: 4-15.

  7. Benelli E, Serra M, Rodriguez Jr A, Cury J. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Car Res. 1993; 27: 280-284.

  8. Fahinur E, Rengin E, Cemal E. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Dent Child. 2003; 70: 10-14.

  9. Seppä L, Torppa E, Luoma H. Effect of different glass ionomers on the acid production and electrolyte metabolism of Streptococcus mutans ingbritt. Car Res. 1992; 26: 434-438.

  10. Duckworth RM, Morgan SN. Oral fluoride retention after use of fluoride dentifrices. Car Res. 1991; 25: 123-129.

  11. Fross H, Näse L, Seppä L. Fluoride concentration, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque from old glass ionomer fillings. Car Res. 1995; 29: 50-53.

  12. Rippa LW. Dental materials related to prevention-fluoride incorporation into dental materials: reaction paper. Adv Dent Res. 1991; 5: 56-59.

  13. Graham JM. Atlas práctico de cementos de ionómero de vidrio. Barcelona: Ed Salvat; 1990. pp. 120-123.

  14. Roeland JG, De Moor, Verbeeck RMH, Erna AP, De Maeyer. Fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer formulations. Dent Mater. 1996; 12: 88-95.

  15. Weidlich P, Miranda LA, Maltz M, Samuel SMW. Fluoride release and uptake from glass ionomer cements and composite resins. Braz Dent J. 2000; 11 (2): 89-96.

  16. Mc Lean JW. Clinical aplications of glass ionomer cements. Op Dent. 1992; 5: 184-190.

  17. Barceló FH, Palma JM. Materiales dentales. México: Ed. Trillas; 2004. pp. 97-102.

  18. Jonhnson GH, Powell LV, De Rouen TA. Post-cementation pulpal sensitivity: zinc phosphate and glass ionomer luting cements. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993; 124 (11): 38-46.

  19. Castro GW, Gray SE, Buikema DJ, Regan SE. The effect of various surface coatings on fluoride release from glass ionomer cement. Oper Dent. 1994; 19 (5): 194-198.

  20. Scholtanus JD, Huysmans MC. Clinical failure of class II restaurations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study. J Dent. 2007; 32 (2): 156-162.

  21. Instructivo anexo del CIV Ketac Molar Easymix® (3M ESPE).

  22. De Shepper EJ, Berr EA 3rd, Cailleteau JG, Tate WH. A comparative study of fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements. Rev Belge Med Dent. 1996; 51 (1): 22-35.

  23. Wilson AD, Groffman DM, Kuhn AT. The release of fluoride and other chemical species from a glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 1985; 6: 431-433.

  24. Perrin C, Persin M, Sarrazin J. A comparision of fluoride release from four glass-ionomer cements. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1997; 39 (3): 123-127.

  25. Gloober SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk-Kotze TJ. A comparision of fluoride release from various dental materials. J Dent. 1998; 26 (3): 259-265.

  26. Bala O, Uctasil M, Can H, Türköz E, Cam M. Fluoride release from various restorative materials. J Dent. 1998; 26 (4): 355-359.

  27. Wiegand A, Wolfgang B, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 343-362.

  28. Forsten L. Fluoride release of glass ionomers. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1994; 6: 217-222.

  29. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppä L, Louma H. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Car Res. 1999; 25: 454-458.

  30. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6 month data. J Dent. 1998; 26 (4): 344-359.

  31. Ausmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer cement, a componer, and from experimental resin composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80 (4): 474-478.

  32. Swift E. Effects of glass ionomers on recurrent caries. Oper Dent. 1989; 14: 40-43.

  33. Loyola J, García F, Lindquist R. Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci. Pediatr Dent. 1994; 16 (5): 346-349.

  34. Forss H, Näse L, Seppa L. Fluoride concentration, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque from old glass ionomer fillings. Car Res. 1995; 29: 50-53.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com