Language: Spanish
References: 109
Page: 99-108
PDF size: 185.99 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract

REFERENCES

2. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al: New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(11): 2992-2994.

3. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, et al: Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(11): 2102-2109.

4. Cipriano CA, Brown NM, Michael AM, Moric M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ: Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(7): 594-600.

5. Ghanem E, Antoci V Jr, Pulido L, Joshi A, Hozack W, Parvizi J: The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis. 2009; 13(6): e444-449.

6. Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, et al: Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(7): 1409-1416.

7. Olshaker JS, Jerrard DA. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Emerg Med. 1997; 15(6): 869-874.

8. Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG: Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(9): 1869-1875.

9. Bedair H, Ting N, Jacovides C, et al: The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(1): 34-40.

10. Dinneen A, Guyot A, Clements J, Bradley N: Synovial fluid white cell and differential count in the diagnosis or exclusion of prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(4): 554-557.

11. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Odum SM, Griffin WL, Nussman DS: The value of white blood cell counts before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(8): 1038-1043.

12. Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R: Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med. 2004; 117(8): 556-562.

13. Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Huang R, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J: Periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a complete understanding of white blood cell count and differential. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(9): 1589-1593.

14. Tsaras G, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY, et al: Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(18): 1700-1711.

15. Fehring TK, McAlister JA Jr: Frozen histologic section as a guide to sepsis in revision joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 (304): 229-237.

16. Ko PS, Ip D, Chow KP, Cheung F, Lee OB, Lam JJ: The role of intraoperative frozen section in decision making in revision hip and knee arthroplasties in a local community hospital. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20 (2): 189-195.

17. Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Steiner G, Zuckerman JD: The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78 (10): 1553-1558.

18. Morawietz L, Tiddens O, Mueller M, et al: Twenty-three neutrophil granulocytes in 10 high-power fields is the best histopathological threshold to differentiate between aseptic and septic endoprosthesis loosening. Histopathology. 2009; 54(7): 847-853.

19. Nunez LV, Buttaro MA, Morandi A, Pusso R, Piccaluga F: Frozen sections of samples taken intraoperatively for diagnosis of infection in revision hip surgery. Acta Orthop. 2007; 78(2): 226-230.

20. Stroh DA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Mont MA: How do frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnoses compare for staged revision after periprosthetic hip infections? J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(9): 1663-1668 e1661.

21. Krenn V, Morawietz L, Kienapfel H, et al: Revised consensus classification. Histopathological classification of diseases associated with joint endoprostheses. Z Rheumatol. 2013; 72(4): 383-392.

22. Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Antoci V, Ghanem E: Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the utility of a simple yet unappreciated enzyme. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 93 (24): 2242-2248.

23. Wetters NG, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Morris MJ, Tucker TL, Della Valle CJ: Leukocyte esterase reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(8 Suppl): 8-11.

24. Aggarwal VK, Tischler E, Ghanem E, Parvizi J: Leukocyte esterase from synovial fluid aspirate: a technical note. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(1): 193-195.

25. Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, et al: Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36(10): 2932-2939.

26. Mikkelsen DB, Pedersen C, Hojbjerg T, Schonheyder HC: Culture of multiple peroperative biopsies and diagnosis of infected knee arthroplasties. APMIS. 2006; 114(6): 449-452.

27. Muller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S: Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty--evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008; 3: 31.

28. Ghanem E, Ketonis C, Restrepo C, Joshi A, Barrack R, Parvizi J: Periprosthetic infection: where do we stand with regard to Gram stain? Acta Orthop. 2009; 80(1): 37-40.

29. Johnson AJ, Zywiel MG, Stroh DA, Marker DR, Mont MA: Should gram stains have a role in diagnosing hip arthroplasty infections? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(9): 2387-2391.

30. Morgan PM, Sharkey P, Ghanem E, et al: The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(9): 2124-2129.

31. Oethinger M, Warner DK, Schindler SA, Kobayashi H, Bauer TW: Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(4): 954-960.

32. Spangehl MJ, Masterson E, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP: The role of intraoperative gram stain in the diagnosis of infection during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999; 14(8): 952-956.

33. Zywiel MG, Stroh DA, Johnson AJ, Marker DR, Mont MA: Gram stains have limited application in the diagnosis of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis. 2011; 15(10): e702-705.

34. Deirmengian GK, Zmistowski B, Jacovides C, O’Neil J, Parvizi J: Leukocytosis is common after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(11): 3031-3036.

35. Toossi N, Adeli B, Rasouli MR, Huang R, Parvizi J: Serum white blood cell count and differential do not have a role in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27 (8 Suppl): 51-54 e51.

36. Engh CA Jr, Ho H, Engh CA: Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(2): 406-412.

37. Mikhael MM, Hanssen AD, Sierra RJ: Failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty mimicking hip infection. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(2): 443-446.

38. Molvik H, Hanna SA, de Roeck NJ: Failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty presenting as painful groin mass with associated weight loss and night sweats. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010; 39(5): E46-49.

39. Diaz-Ledezma C, Lichstein PM, Dolan JH, Parvizi J: What is the best strategy to diagnose hip/ knee periprosthetic joint infections in Medicare patients seen in the ambulatory setting? CORR. Publication Pending.

40. Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, et al: Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18(12): 760-770.

41. Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P: High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(3): 956-964.

42. Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P, Frommelt L: The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late periprosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(7): 874-878.

43. Fuerst M, Fink B, Ruther W: The value of preoperative knee aspiration and arthroscopic biopsy in revision total knee arthroplasty. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005; 143(1): 36-41.

44. Malhotra R, Morgan DA: Role of core biopsy in diagnosing infection before revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(1): 78-87.

45. Meermans G, Haddad FS: Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(5): 1410-1417.

46. Sadiq S, Wootton JR, Morris CA, Northmore-Ball MD: Application of core biopsy in revision arthroplasty for deep infection. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(2): 196-201.

47. Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I: The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(5): 582-586.

48. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, et al: Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 27(5): 1247-1254.

49. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Berry DJ: Patient-related risk factors for postoperative mortality and periprosthetic joint infection in medicare patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(1): 130-137.

50. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, et al: Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(9): 794-800.

51. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J: Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(7): 1710-1715.

52. Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG: Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(6 Suppl 2): 90-93.

53. Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RS, et al: Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(8): 1637-1643.

54. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Sharkey P, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS, Barrack RL: Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2628-2633.

55. Parvizi J, Jacovides C, Zmistowski B, Jung KA: Definition of periprosthetic joint infection: is there a consensus? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(11): 3022-3030.

56. Schumacher HR Jr, Sieck MS, Rothfuss S, et al: Reproducibility of synovial fluid analyses. A study among four laboratories. Arthritis Rheum. 1986; 29(6): 770-774.

57. Wyles CC, Larson DR, Houdek MT, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT: Utility of synovial fluid aspirations in failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(5): 818-823.

58. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(8 Suppl): 46-50.

59. Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W, Becker K, Erren M, Gotze C. Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-alpha: markers of periprosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(1): 94-99.

60. Ghanem E, Houssock C, Pulido L, Han S, Jaberi FM, Parvizi J: Determining “true” leukocytosis in bloody joint aspiration. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(2): 182-187.

61. Butler-Wu SM, Burns EM, Pottinger PS, et al: Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(7): 2490-2495.

62. Larsen LH, Lange J, Xu Y, Schonheyder HC: Optimizing culture methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a summary of modifications and improvements reported since 1995. J Med Microbiol. 2012; 61(Pt 3): 309-316.

63. Neut D, van Horn JR, van Kooten TG, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ: Detection of biomaterial-associated infections in orthopaedic joint implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 (413): 261-268.

64. Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L: Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(11): 1403-1409.

65. Barrack RL, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS, et al: The fate of the unexpected positive intraoperative cultures after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(6 Suppl 2): 94-99.

66. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR: Prosthetic joint infection diagnosed postoperatively by intraoperative culture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 439: 38-42.

67. Azzam K, Parvizi J, Jungkind D, et al: Microbiological, clinical, and surgical features of fungal prosthetic joint infections: a multi-institutional experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91 Suppl 6: 142-149.

68. Hwang BH, Yoon JY, Nam CH, et al: Fungal peri-prosthetic joint infection after primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(5): 656-659.

69. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Cockerill FR 3rd, Osmon DR: Fungi, mycobacteria, zoonotic and other organisms in prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 451: 64-72.

70. Tokarski AT, O’Neil J, Deirmengian CA, Ferguson J, Deirmengian GK. The Routine use of atypical cultures in presumed aseptic revisions Is unnecessary. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013.

71. Kamme C, Lindberg L: Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981(154): 201-207.

72. Zappe B, Graf S, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W, Sendi P: Propionibacterium spp. in prosthetic joint infections: a diagnostic challenge. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; 128(10): 1039-1046.

73. Jacovides CL, Kreft R, Adeli B, Hozack B, Ehrlich GD, Parvizi J: Successful identification of pathogens by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based electron spray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) in culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(24): 2247-2254.

74. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Hanssen AD, et al: Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(2): 628-631.

75. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al: Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(7): 654-663.

76. Aggarwal VK, Higuera C, Deirmengian G, Parvizi J, Austin MS: Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. Epub before print.

77. Font-Vizcarra L, Garcia S, Martinez-Pastor JC, Sierra JM, Soriano A: Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(8): 2238-2243.

78. Burnett RS, Aggarwal A, Givens SA, McClure JT, Morgan PM, Barrack RL: Prophylactic antibiotics do not affect cultures in the treatment of an infected TKA: a prospective trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1): 127-134.

79. Tetreault MW, Wetters NG, Aggarwal V, Mont M, Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ: The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: should prophylactic antibiotics be withheld before revision surgery to obtain appropriate cultures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. Epub before print.

80. Achermann Y, Vogt M, Leunig M, Wust J, Trampuz A: Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48(4): 1208-1214.

81. Bjerkan G, Witso E, Bergh K: Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80(2): 245-250.

82. Kobayashi H, Oethinger M, Tuohy MJ, Hall GS, Bauer TW: Improving clinical significance of PCR: use of propidium monoazide to distinguish viable from dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Orthop Res. 2009; 27(9): 1243-1247.

83. Monsen T, Lovgren E, Widerstrom M, Wallinder L: In vitro effect of ultrasound on bacteria and suggested protocol for sonication and diagnosis of prosthetic infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(8): 2496-2501.

84. Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Cofield RH, et al: Microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection by use of implant sonication. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(6): 1878-1884.

85. Clarke MT, Roberts CP, Lee PT, Gray J, Keene GS, Rushton N: Polymerase chain reaction can detect bacterial DNA in aseptically loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004(427): 132-137.

86. Esteban J, Alonso-Rodriguez N, del-Prado G, et al: PCR-hybridization after sonication improves diagnosis of implant-related infection. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(3): 299-304.

87. Gallo J, Kolar M, Dendis M, et al: Culture and PCR analysis of joint fluid in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. New Microbiol. 2008; 31(1): 97-104.

88. Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham SA, et al: Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(11): 3501-3508.

89. Mariani BD, Martin DS, Levine MJ, Booth RE Jr, Tuan RS: The Coventry Award. Polymerase chain reaction detection of bacterial infection in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996(331): 11-22.

90. Panousis K, Grigoris P, Butcher I, Rana B, Reilly JH, Hamblen DL: Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76(3): 341-346.

91. Rak M, Barlic-Maganja D, Kavcic M, Trebse R, Cor A: Comparison of molecular and culture method in diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013; 343(1): 42-48.

92. Rasouli MR, Harandi AA, Adeli B, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J: Revision total knee arthroplasty: infection should be ruled out in all cases. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1239-1243 e1231-1232.

93. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, et al: Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37(10): 3281-3290.

94. Portillo ME, Salvado M, Sorli L, et al: Multiplex PCR of sonication fluid accurately differentiates between prosthetic joint infection and aseptic failure. J Infect. 2012; 65(6): 541-548.

95. Kobayashi N, Inaba Y, Choe H, et al: Simultaneous intraoperative detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and pan-bacterial infection during revision surgery: use of simple DNA release by ultrasonication and real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(12): 2896-2902.

96. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR: Appearance of septic hip prostheses on plain radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163(2): 377-380.

97. Love C, Tomas MB, Marwin SE, Pugliese PV, Palestro CJ: Role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of the infected joint replacement. Radiographics. 2001; 21(5): 1229-1238.

98. Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabere MP, Lopez FM, Maury P, Taourel P: Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology. 2002; 224(2): 477-483.

99. Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Newberg A, Zhuang H, Alavi A: FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(6): 1338-1342.

100. Delank KS, Schmidt M, Michael JW, Dietlein M, Schicha H, Eysel P: The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006; 7: 20.

101. Glithero PR, Grigoris P, Harding LK, Hesslewood SR, McMinn DJ: White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(3): 371-374.

102. Graute V, Feist M, Lehner S, et al: Detection of low-grade prosthetic joint infections using 99mTc-antigranulocyte SPECT/CT: initial clinical results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37(9): 1751-1759.

103. Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB, et al: Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: a comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45(11): 1864-1871.

104. Magnuson JE, Brown ML, Hauser MF, Berquist TH, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Klee GG: In-111-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy in suspected orthopedic prosthesis infection: comparison with other imaging modalities. Radiology. 1988; 168(1): 235-239.

105. Nagoya S, Kaya M, Sasaki M, Tateda K, Yamashita T: Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection at the hip using triple-phase bone scintigraphy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(2): 140-144.

106. Savarino L, Baldini N, Tarabusi C, Pellacani A, Giunti A: Diagnosis of infection after total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 70(1): 139-145.

107. Scher DM, Pak K, Lonner JH, Finkel JE, Zuckerman JD, Di Cesare PE: The predictive value of indium-111 leukocyte scans in the diagnosis of infected total hip, knee, or resection arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(3): 295-300.

108. Segura AB, Munoz A, Brulles YR, et al: What is the role of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses? Nucl Med Commun. 2004; 25(5): 527-532.

109. Sousa R, Massada M, Pereira A, Fontes F, Amorim I, Oliveira A: Diagnostic accuracy of combined 99mTc-sulesomab and 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow imaging in detecting prosthetic joint infection. Nucl Med Commun. 2011; 32(9): 834-839.