medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2013, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2013; 27 (5)

Fractures of the mid third of the clavicle. Results after osteosynthesis

González-Pérez AM, Lopiz-Morales Y, García-Fernández C, Marco-Martínez F

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 288-292
PDF size: 201.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: The traditional idea that most fractures of the mid third of the clavicle heal with a good functional outcome after orthopedic treatment is increasingly controversial due to the publication of studies reporting high pseudoarthrosis rates and functional limitations in certain subpopulations. Our objective is to analyze the results obtained with open reduction and internal fixation with low profile plates for the treatment of these fractures. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, cohort study of the patients who underwent surgery for displaced fracture of the mid third between January 2006 and December 2009. They all were radiologically and functionally assessed using the Constant and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scales. Results: Surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the mid third of the clavicle with low profile plates using a meticulous technique results in low intra- and postoperative complication rates, with a mean healing rate of 4 months. The Constant score in the affected arm compared with the healthy one was 93.41% in the subjective assessment and 96% in the objective one. Conclusions: The good functional results obtained lead us to recommend this type of treatment, mainly in certain subpopulations (young and active patients).


REFERENCES

  1. Altamimi SA, McKee MD: Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation f displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1-8.

  2. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F: Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 452-6.

  3. Pearson AM, Tosteson ANA, Koval KJ, McKee MD, Cantu RV, Bell JE, et al: Is Surgery for Displaced, Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adults Cost-Effective? Results Based on a Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2010; 24: 426-433.

  4. Neer CS: Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc. 1960; 172: 1006-11.

  5. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society: Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1-10.

  6. Khan LA, Bradnock TJ, Scott C, Robinson CM: Fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 447-460.

  7. Hillen RJ, Burger BJ, Poll RG, de GA, Robinson CM: Malunion after midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81: 273-9.

  8. Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD: Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2,144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19: 504-7.

  9. Shen JW, Tong PJ, Qu HB: A three-dimensional reconstruction plate for displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 1495-8.

  10. Nordqvist A, Redlund-Johnell I, von SA, Petersson CJ: Shortening of clavicle after fracture. Incidence and clinical significance, a 5-year follow-up of 85 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997; 68: 349-51.

  11. Gossard JM: Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 558.

  12. Nowak J, Holgersson M, Larsson S: Can we predict long-term sequelae after fractures of the clavicle based on initial findings? A prospective study with nine to ten years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13: 479-86.

  13. Postacchini R, Gumina S, Farsetti P, Postacchini F: Long-term results of conservative management of midshaft clavicle fracture. F Int Orthop. 2010; 34(5): 731-6.

  14. Allman FL: Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. JBJS. 1967; 49: 774-84.

  15. Robinson CM: Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 476-84.

  16. Hudak P, Amadio PC, Bombardier C; The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 602-8.

  17. Constant CR, Murley AH: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 214: 160-4.

  18. Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR: Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 279-85.

  19. Rowe CR: An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968; 58: 29-42.

  20. Duan X, Zhong G, Cen S, Huang F, Xiang Z: Plating versus intramedullary pin or conservative treatment for midshaft fracture of clavicle: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(6): 1008-15.

  21. Stegeman SA, de Jong M, Sier CF, Krijnen P, et al: Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 24; 12: 196.

  22. McKee MD, Seiler JG, Jupiter JB: The application of the limited contact dynamic compression plate in the upper extremity: an analysis of 114 consecutive cases. Injury. 1995; 26: 661-66.

  23. Poigenfurst J, Rappold G, Fischer W: Plating of fresh clavicular fractures: results of 122 operations. Injury. 1992; 23: 237-41.

  24. Kulshrestha V, Roy T, Audige L: Operative versus nonoperative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25(1): 31-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com