medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2013, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2013; 36 (6)

Edad de presentación de los reactivos del Test de Denver II en Niños de 0 a 4 años de edad del Estado de Morelos

Rivera GR, Sánchez C, Corral GI, Figueroa OM, Soler LK, Martínez VI, Oliveros ML, Ortiz MM

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 459-470
PDF size: 414.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The Denver Developmental Screening Test (Denver II) is the most used internationally tool for child development surveillance, from which assessments and changes have been made in several countries, from the estimate of the age of presentation of the items, because it constitutes the basis of its structure and validity.
Objective To identify the age and sequences acquiring of each item of the Denver- II test during the first four years of life in children of low socioeconomic status from a community of Morelos State, Mexico.
Method 2350 assessments were conducted to children from 0 to 48 months of age. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the age of presentation of each item to the centiles 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th. Differences were established with values of reference based on confidence intervals up to 95% for 90th centile.
Results Of the 98 items evaluated, 42 were submitted delayed, 23 showed no statistical difference and 33 were acquired in earlier age in children of Morelos. In the Gross Motor and Personal-social areas predominated the delayed with 19/25 and 11/21 items, respectively. By contrast, in Fine Motor-Adaptive and Language predominated the advances, with 11/22 and 16/30 items.
Conclusions There are differences in the age and sequence of presentation of the items of the Denver-II test in the population studied. Adjustments are recommended before implementing its use in specific socio-cultural contexts.


REFERENCES

  1. Sánchez C, Mandujano M, Martínez I, Muñoz-Ledo P et al. Los procedimientos de tamizaje para la evaluación y el seguimiento del desarrollo infantil. Revista Ciencias clínicas 2004;5(1):11-20.

  2. Rivera-González R, Sánchez C. Vigilancia del desarrollo integral del niño. Primera edición. México, DF: Editores de Textos Mexicanos; 2009.

  3. Dworkin P. British and American recommndations for developmental monitoring: The role of surveillance. Pediatrics 1989;84(6):1000-10.

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics. Screening infants and young children for developmental disabilities (RE9414). Pediatrics 1994;93(5):863-5.

  5. Kerfeld CI, Guthrie M, Stewart KB. Evaluation of the Denver II as applied to Alaska native children. Pediatr Phys Ther 1997;9:23-31.

  6. Drachler ML, Marshall T, de-Carvalho-Leite JC. A continuous-scale measure of child development for populationbased epidemiological surveys: a preliminary study using Item Response Theory for the Denver Test. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiology 2007;21:138-53.

  7. Solomons G, Solomons H. Motor development in Yucatan Infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1975;17(1):41-6.

  8. Lejarraga H, Krupitzky S, Kelmansky D, Martínez E et al. Edad de cumplimiento de pautas de desarrollo en niños argentinos sanos menores de seis años. Arch Arg Pediatr 1996;94:355-68.

  9. Chen ST. Comparison between the development of Malaysian and Denver children. J Singapore Paediatri Soc 1989;31:178-85.

  10. Sánchez C, Rivera-González R, Martínez-Vázquez I, Corral-Guillé I et al. Indicadores de desarrollo del CAT/CLAMS en lactantes de una comunidad urbana de México. Reporte preliminar. Revista Mexicana Pediatría 2008;75(5):217-27.

  11. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H et al. The Denver II: A major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Pediatrics 1992;89(1):91-7.

  12. Frankenburg WK, Dodds JB, Archer P, Bresnick B et al. Denver II, training manual. Denver, Colorado: Denver Developmental Materials Inc; 1992.

  13. Glascoe FP, Martin ED, Humphrey S. A comparative review of Developmental Screening Tests. Pediatrics 1990;86(4):547-54.

  14. Sices L. Use of developmental milestones in pediatric residency training and practice: Time to rethink the meaning of the mean. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2007;28(1):47–52.

  15. Salazar A, Ramírez E, González RE, Alva E. Modificaciones de la escala de Denver en la evaluación de las condiciones del neurodesarrollo en niños atendidos con hipoxia neonatal en una unidad de terapia intensiva. Rev Mex Neuroci 2006;7(1):88-99.

  16. Jie S, Yue-Mei Z, Xing-Yuan G. Restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test for Shanghai children. Chinese Med J 1982;95:375-80.

  17. Ramcharan R, Ali Z, Adams J, Simeon D. Standardization of the Denver Development Screening Test II (DDST II) for Trinidadian children [18/11/2010]. En: http://www.chrc-caribbean.org/files/GRANT REPORTS 2005/J. Ramcharan.pdf

  18. Accardo PJ, Capute AJ. The Capute Scales. Cognitive Adaptive Test/ Clinical Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS): Brookes Publishing Company; 2005.

  19. Lim HC, Chan T, Yoong T. Standardisation and adaptation of the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) and Denver II for use in Singapore children. Singapore Med J 1994;35(2):156-60.

  20. Wijedasa D. Developmental screening in context: adaptation and standardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test-II (DDST-II) for Sri Lankan children. Child: care, health and development 2011;38 (6):889-99.

  21. Lejarraga H, Pascucci MC, Krupitzky S, Kelmansky D et al. Psychomotor development in Argentinean children aged 0–5 years. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiology 2002;16:47-60.

  22. Frankenburg W, Dodds JB, Archer P, Bresnick B et al. Denver II, Technical manual. Denver, Colorado: Denver Developmental Materials Inc; 1990.

  23. Aguilar M, Fernández X, Luna G, Ocampo R et al. Cédula socioeconómica comparada con estudio social. Análisis en el Instituto Nacional de Pediatria. Acta Pediatr Méx 2001;22(2):118-21.

  24. Bryant GM, Davies KJ, Newcombe RG. The Denver Developmental Screening Test. Achievement of test items in the first year of life by Denver and Cardiff infants. Developmental Medicine Child Neurology 1974;16:475-84.

  25. Fisberg M, Pedromonico MR, Braga JAP, Ferrerira AMA et al. Comparação do desempenho de pré-escolares, mediante teste de desenvolvimento de Denver, antes e após intervenção nutricional. Rev Ass Med Brasil 1997;43(2):99-104.

  26. Shapira Y, Harel S. Standardization of the Denver developmental screening test for Israeli children. Isr J Med Sci 1983;19(3):246-51.

  27. Ueda R. Characteristics of child development in Okinawa: Comparisons with Tokyo and Denver and implications for developmental screening. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1978;20:657- 63.

  28. Gesell A, Amatruda C. Diagnóstico del desarrollo normal y anormal del niño. México: Editorial Paidos; 1994.

  29. Ontiveros E, Cravioto J, Sánchez C, Barragán G. Evaluación del desarrollo motor en función de género, estimulación disponible en el hogar y nivel socioeconómico en niños de 0 a 3 años de edad en el área rural. Bol Med Hosp Infant (Méx) 2000;57(6): 311-19.

  30. Nelson EAS, Yu LM, Wong D, Wong HYE et al. Rolling over in infants: age, ethnicity, and cultural differences. Developmental Medicine Child Neurology 2004;46:706-9.

  31. Díaz LR. Etnopsicología mexicana. Siguiendo la huella teórica y empírica de Díaz-Guerrero. México: Trillas; 2008.

  32. Domenech RM, Donovick M, Crowley S. Parenting styles in a cultural context: Observations of ‘‘protective parenting’’ in first-generation latinos. Family Process 2009;48(2):195-210.

  33. de Barros KM, Câmara A, Bezerra A, Cabral J et al. Do environmental influences alter motor abilities acquisition? A comparison among children from day-care centers and private schools. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61(2A):170-5.

  34. Carter JA, Lees JA, Murira GM, Gona J et al. Issues in the development of cross-cultural assessments of speech and language for children. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2005;40(4):385-401.

  35. Lejarraga H, del Pino M, Kelmansky D, Laurencena E L et al. Edad de la pauta madurativa “mamá-papá específico”, en una muestra de niños sanos. Arch Arg Pediatr 2005;103(6):514-51.

  36. Raikes A. Family environments and early development in low-income Nicaraguan children. Interamerican J Psychology 2005;39(3):399-412.

  37. Hayashi K. The influence of clothes and bedclothes of infant´s gross motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol 1990;32(9):833-4 1992;34(6):557-8.

  38. Bartlett S. Climate change and urban children: Impacts and implications for adaptation in low- and middle-income countries. En: Human Settlements Programme International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), editor; 2008.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com