medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2014; 2 (1)

Slot tolerance from three different commercial brands of brackets

Martínez PLE, Ruíz DR, Ruiz BG, Padilla OS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 38-41
PDF size: 242.34 Kb.


Key words:

Slot tolerance, slot depth, internal height of the slot, external height of the slot.

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of the size of 0.018” x 0.025” slots in brackets of three trading companies (3M, GAC and ORMCO). Methods: 120 first premolar stainless steel brackets of three trading houses were analyzed forming three groups of 40 brackets. Each bracket was observed under a Profile Projector Microscope. Three measurements were obtained for each slot: depth, internal and external height. The data were tabulated and statistically analyzed by the ANOVA test and the Student’s t test. Results:The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in depth and internal and external height between the bracket’s slot of 3 different companies (p ‹ 0.05). The companies 3M and GAC fulfilled the manufacturer’s specifications (p ‹ 0.05). In terms of internal height, GAC complied with the manufacturer’s specifications (p ‹ 0.05). In relation to external height, ORMCO complied with what is specified by the manufacturer (p ‹ 0.05).


REFERENCES

  1. Sheldon P. Orthodontic slot size: It’s time to retool. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71 (5): 329-330.

  2. Kusy RP. Orthodontic biomaterials: from the past to the present. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72 (6): 501-512.

  3. Robert MR. A plea for agreement. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71 (3): 156.

  4. Siatkowski R. Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and archwire dimensions. J Clin Orthod. 1999; 33: 508-510.

  5. Creekmore TD, Kunik RI. Straight wire: the next generation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993; 104: 8-20.

  6. Sebanc J, Brantley WA, Pincsak J, Conover JP. Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86 (1): 43-51.

  7. Torstein R, Meling MD. On mechanical properties of square and rectangular stainless steel wires tested in torsion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997; 111 (3): 310-320.

  8. Torstein RM, Odegaard J, Seqner D. On bracket slot height: a methodologic study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998; 113 (4): 387-393.

  9. Kusy R, Whitley J. Assessment of second-order clearances between orthodontic archwires and bracket slots via the critical contact angle for binding. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69: 71-80.

  10. Cash AC. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets-are standards as expected? Angle Orthod. 2004; 74 (4): 450-453.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2014;2