medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-6037 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Asociación Mexicana de Comunicación, Audiología, Otoneurología y Foniatría, A.C.,

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex AMCAOF 2012; 1 (1)

BAEPs and TEOAEs in infants 9 to 24 months after neonatal screening

Uribe-Escamilla R, Alfaro-Rodríguez A

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 18-24
PDF size: 108.36 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. Shown the utility of the brainstem evoked potentials and the transitory otoacoustic emissions, after the hearing screening. Material and methods. Design: Is a prospective study, non experimental, transversal. Method: We use the children of the infantile stance in the Orient zone of the city, to make a hearing screening when probe or no probe the test, the children that no probe the hearing screening 2 times with 15 days of interval we procedure to do a brainstem auditory evoked potentials and transitory otoacoustic emissions. Results. Use descriptive statistics founded that the 80% of the subjects present normal hearing with the brainstem auditory evoked potentials and 20% present any type of hearing loss. 47% present in the otoacoustic emissions a total reproducibility ‹ 70%. Conclusions. The otoacoustic emissions evaluated the cochlea function, the outer hair cells, and the brainstem auditory evoked potentials evaluated the auditory pathway since the VIII cranial nerve to the inferior colliculus, and then with the evoked potentials we can get the auditory threshold. If we have both is important to do how the first instance both studies there are complementary.


REFERENCES

  1. Schnell-Inderst P, Kunze S, Hessel F, et al. Screening of the hearing of newborns-Update. GMS Health Technology Assessment 2006; 2: 1-14.

  2. Owen M, Webb M, Evans K. Community based universal neonatal hearing screening by health visitors using otoacoustic emissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2001; 84: F157–F162.

  3. Baroch KA. Universal newborn hearing screening: fine-tuning the process. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2003; 11: 424-7.

  4. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Otoacoustic emissions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11(5): 361-6.

  5. Sininger YS. Audiologic assessment in infants. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2003; 11: 378-82.

  6. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Otoacoustic emissions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11: 361–6.

  7. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. British Medical Bulletin 2002; 63: 223-41.

  8. Tognola G, Ravazzani P, Molini E, Ricci G, Alunni N, Parazzini M, Grandori F. Linear and “derived” otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study. Ear & Hearing 2001; 22(3); 182-90.

  9. Ho V, Daly KA, Hunter LL, Davey C. Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry screening among 0–5 year olds. Laryngoscope 2002; 112(3): 513–9.

  10. Chen L, Morales D, Taber KH, Hayman LA. Intracranial auditory pathways: anatomy correlated with evoked response data. J Computer Assisted Tomography 2002; 26(3): 482-5.

  11. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br Med Bull 2002; 63: 223-41.

  12. Cacaceress AT, Pinheiro JMB. Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in neonates and young children: a correlation and factor analytical study. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 156-67.

  13. American Academy Pediatrics. Joint committee on infant hearing 1994 position statement. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 152-6.

  14. Brookhouser PE, Beauchaine KL, Osberger MJ. Management of the child with sensorineural hearing loss. Medical, surgical, hearing aids, cochlear implants. Pediatr Clin North 1999; 461: 121-41.

  15. NIH Consens Statement. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Scientific report 1993; 11: 1-2.

  16. Golstein PJ, Krunholz A, Felix, et al. Brainstem evoked response in neonates. Am J Oblet Gynecol 1979; 135: 612.

  17. Hecox KE, Galambos R. Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Archives of Otolaringology 1974; 1(99): 30-33.

  18. Jacobson JT, Morehouse CR, Johonson MJ. Stratagies for infant auditory brain stem response assessment. Ear and Hearing 1988; 3: 263-70.

  19. Jerger J, Hayes D, Jordan C. Clinical experience with auditory brainstem evoked response audiometry in pediatric assessment. Ear Hear 1980; 1: 19.

  20. Harrison WA, Norton SJ. Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and hearing’ impaired children. Ear and Hearing 1999; 20(1): 75-86.

  21. Robinette MS, Glattke TJ. Otoacoustic emissions clinical applications, 1st. Ed. Ed. Thieme New York-Stuttgart; 1997.

  22. Ohwatari R, Fukuda S, Chida E. Preserved otoacoustic emission in a child with a profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Auris Nasus Larynx 2001; 28(Suppl.): S117-S120.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com