2013, Number 2
Factors associated with the selection of pramipexole extended release versus immediate release in patients with Parkinson disease
Cervantes-Arriaga A, Rodríguez-Violante M, López-Ruiz M, Estrada-Bellmann I, Zúñiga-Ramírez C, Otero-Cerdeira E, Camacho-Ordóñez A, González-Latapi P, Morales-Briceño H, Martínez-Ramírez D
Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 76-80
PDF size: 616.74 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Pramipexole is a dopamine agonist effective to treat the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease available as immediate or extended release. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine whether there are differences in the profile of patients receiving pramipexole according to the formulation used. Methods: A crosssectional retrospective study was conducted which reviewed the information of 464 patients belonging to the Mexican Parkinson’s Disease registry (ReMePARK) treated with stable doses of pramipexole. Data were collected including demographic and clinical information along with severity and motor scales. Dose and formulation of patients receiving pramipexole was collected. A regression model was used to identify associated factores. Results: About 69.4% of patients were on the immediate release formulation, only 31.7% were on monotherapy. The mean dose of pramipexole immediate release was 1.7 ± 1.2 mg, while the extended release dose was 1.9 ± 1.1 mg (p = 0.09). Patients receiving pramipexole extended release were younger (p = 0.048), with more years of formal education (p ‹ 0.001) and were receiving it as monotherapy (p ‹ 0.001). Conculsion: No differences in the doses of pramipexole immediate and extended release was found. Patients receiving pramipexole extended release were younger, in monotherapy and had more years of formal education.REFERENCES
Cervantes-Arriaga A, Rodríguez-Violante M, López-Ruiz M, Estrada-Bellmann I, Otero-Cerdeira E, Dávila-Ortiz D, et al. Estudio para una cohorte multicéntrica de pacientes mexicanos con enfermedad de Parkinson para evaluar los determinantes motores, no motores y genéticos sobre la progresión. Arch Neurocien (Mex) 2012; 17: 159-64.