medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3100 (Print)

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2013; 27 (1)

Finite element modeling of epiphyseal gliding

Castro AH, Garzón-Alvarado DA, Galván F

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 66-83
PDF size: 963.75 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Methods: models corresponding to the combinations among each of the defined parameters (angle, mass and physical activity) were developed, generating 20 different cases and efforts present through the growth plate were evaluated.
Results: a similar and uniform behaviour between each of the combinations is shown as well as an increase in tension at the same time as the value of the load and angle increases.
Conclusions: effort tends to increase when there is an increment in both the angle and the physical mass what suggests that these two factors could have a decisive influence on the origin of the epiphyseal gliding.


REFERENCES

  1. Benchot R. The adolescent with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatric Nursing. 1996;11(3):175-82.

  2. Parsons SJ, Barton C, Banerjee R, Kiely NT. Slipped upper femoral epiphy-sis. Current Orthopaedics. 2007;21(3):215-28.

  3. Loder RT, Skopelja EN. The epidemiology and demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, ISRN. Orthopedics. 2011;20(11):19.

  4. Perry D, Bruce C. Hip disorders in childhood. Surgery (Oxford). 2011;29(4):181-6. Orthopaedics V: Paediatrics.

  5. Gray H. Anatomy of the human body. 30 ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. p. 63-90. ISBN 10: 978-0812106442.

  6. Arronson DD, Loder RT, Breur GJ, Weienstein SL. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Current concepts. J Am Acad Ortop Surg. 2006;14:666-79.

  7. Images of musculoskeletal oncology. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (scfe)- pathology. University at Buffalo: Department of Orthopaedics [Consultado 5 Abril 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.smbs.buffalo.edu/ortho/MSK/scfe/2.html

  8. Kelsey JL, Keggi KJ, Southwick WO. The incidence and distributions of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in connecticut and southwestern united states. J Bone Joint Surg. 1970;52-A(6):1203-16.

  9. Kelsey JL. Epidemiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A review of the lite- rapture. Pediatrics. 1973;51(6):1042-50.

  10. Ogden JA, Ganey T, Light TR, Southwick WO. The pathology of acute chondro-osseous injury in the child. Yale J Biol Med. 1993;66(3):219-33.

  11. Loder RT, Hensinger RN, Alburger PD. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with radia- tion therapy. J Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1998;18(5):630-6.

  12. Gómez Benito M, Moreo P, Pérez M, Paseta O, García Aznar J, Barrios C, et al. A damage model for the growth plate: Application to the prediction of slipped capital epiphysis. J Biomechanics. 2007;40(15):3305-13.

  13. Fishkin Z, Armstrong DG, Shah H, Patra A, Mihalko W M. Proximal femoral physis shear in slipped capital femoral epiphysis-a finite element study. J Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2006;26(3):291-4.

  14. Chung SM, Batterman SC, Brighton CT. Shear strength of the human femoral epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surgery. 1976;58-A(1):94-103.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com