Rodríguez CJA, Barceló SFH, Borges YSA, Arenas AJÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 38-44
PDF size: 350.70 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the resistance when debonding the braces of the enamel after 60 minutes and 24 hours of its fixation with two different adhesive systems. 60 bicuspids where divided into 4 groups of 15 samples each one and were treated with self-etching adhesive SEP Transbond Plus 3M Unitek (group 3 and 4) and conventional adhesive Transbond MIP 3M Unitek (group 1 and 2). The samples were submitted to tangential forces with the universal machine Instron with speed load shedding 1.0 mm/min to obtain the resistance when debonding. After doing the statically analysis ANOVA showed that there are not significant statically difference at the debonding forces between Transbond MIP at 24 hours (mean = 6.8, SD = 2.9) and SEP Transbond at 24 hours (mean = 6.1, SD = 2.8) (t = 0.73 p = 0.46). There is no statistically significant difference between Transbond MIP at 60 minutes (mean = 6.01 SD = 5.2) and SEP Transbond Plus at 60 minutes (mean = 7.35, SD = 5.1) (t = -.71 p = 0.48). It was seen lees than the middle of the remnant adhesive in most of the sample.

REFERENCES

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasiong the adhesion of acrylic filling material to enamel superfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 38: 849-853.

2. Newman GV. Epoxy a adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod.1965; 51: 901-912.

3. Retief DH, Sadowsky PL. Clinical experience with the acid etch technique in ortodontics. Am J Orthod. 1975; 68: 645-654.

4. Carstensen W. The effects of different phosphoric acid concentrations on surface enamel. Angle Orthod. 1992; 62: 51-58.

5. Hosein I, Sheriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 717-724.

6. Millar RA. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod. 2001; 35: 42-45.

7. Arnold RW, Combe EC, Walfor JH Jr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122: 274-276.

8. Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Laffon JF. Comparison of the sear bond strength between a convencional and a new integrated bonding system. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 233-238.

9. Dorminey JC, Duna WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etch ant and primer technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124: 410-413.

10. Kimura T, Duna WJ, Taloumis LJ. Effect of fluoride varnish on the in vitro bond strength of orthodontic brackets using a self-etching primer system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125: 351-356.

11. Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Laffon JF. Comparison of the sear bond strength of 2 self–etch primer/adhesive sstems. Am J Orthod Dentofacail Orthop. 2004; 125: 348-350.

12. Pickett K, Sadowsky P, Jacobson A, Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: Comparision with in vitro results. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71: 141-148.

13. Keizer S, Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69: 318–327.

14. Aljubouri YD, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Laboratory evaluation of a self-etching primer for orthodontic bonding. Eur J orthod. 2003; 25: 411-415.

15. Mitchell CA, O’Hagan E, Walter JM. Probability of failure of orthodontic brackets bonded with different ceenting agents. Dental Mater. 1995; 11: 317-322.

16. Klocke A, Shi J, Vaziri F, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Effect of time on bond strength in indirect bonding. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 245-250.

17. Movahhed HZ, Ogard B, Syverud M. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforces glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 477-483.

18. Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D. Effects of self-etching primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets at different debond times. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 108-112.

19. Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Soliman MMA, Warren JJ, Laffoon JF, Ajlouni R. Comparison of bonding time and shear bond strength between a conventional and integrated bonding system. Angle Ortod. 2005; 75: 237-242.

20. Wade AO, Bishara SE, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Influence of self-etchan aplication time on bracket shear bond strength. Angle Ortod. 2007; 77: 885-889.

21. López FS, Palma CJ, Guerrero IJ, Ballesteros LM, Elorsa PH. Fuerza de retención al esmalte con adhesivos usados en ortodoncia, utilizando dos tipos de bases de brackets (estudio comparativo in vitro). Revista odontológica Mexicana. 2004; 8: 122-126.

22. Trites B, Foley TF, Banting D. Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etching primers over a 3-month storage period. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 709-716.