Rodríguez-Pérez V, Valencia-Flores M, Reyes-Lagunes I, Lara-Muñoz MC

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 307-313
PDF size: 253.73 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a highly disabling sleep disorder related to alterations in behavioral performance, work injuries and vehicle accidents. A high prevalence of EDS (from 16% to 32%) in the general population has been reported. The Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) is an instrument that measures the impact of EDS in a patient´s functional state in different sleep disorders. This questionnaire has been validated in different countries (Norway, Turkey, Spain). Therefore, the objective of this study was to obtain the cultural validation, the internal consistency, construct validity and factor congruence of the adapted questionnaire for the inhabitants of Mexico City (FOSQ-México). In the first part of the study we translated the questionnaire using the standard methodological process. The FOSQ cultural adaptation was made by the Natural Modified Semantic Networks technique in a sample of 78 participants. In the second part, the adapted FOSQ was applied to 152 participants to test items discrimination, internal consistency, factor analysis by principal-components and factorial congruence with the original version. The principal-components analysis of the FOSQ yielded six meaningful factors that explained 67.2% of the total variance, an average α coefficient between 0.85 to 0.94 for the six factors. The factorial congruence coefficients ranged from 0.360 to 0.969 between the original and the FOSQ-México version. This study demonstrated that the FOSQ version for inhabitants of Mexico City is reliable, valid and conceptually equivalent to the American version.

REFERENCES

1. Weaver TE, Laizner AM, Evans LK, Maislin G et al. An instrument to measure functional status outcomes for disorders of excessive sleepiness. Sleep 1997;20(10):835-843.

2. Engleman HM, Douglas NJ. Sleepiness, cognitive function, and quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea/ hypopnoea syndrome. Thorax 2004;59:618–622.

3. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The International Classification of Sleep Disorders. Segunda edición. Westchester, Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2005.

4. Ohayon MM. Epidemiology of excessive daytime sleepiness. Sleep Med Clin 2006;1:9-16.

5. Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Lin HM, Calhoun SL et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness in a general population sample: The role of sleep apnea, age, obesity, diabetes, and depression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:4510–4515.

6. Hoddes E, Zarcone V, Smythe H, Phillips R et al. Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach. Psychophysiology 1973;10:431-436.

7. Rosenthal L, Roehrs TA, Roth T. The sleep-wake activity inventory: a selfreport measure of daytime sleepiness. Biol Psychiatry 1993;34:810-820.

8. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep 1991;14:540-545.

9. Akashiba T, Kawahara S, Akahoshi T, Omori C et al. Relationship between quality of life and mood or depression in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 2002;122:861–865.

10. Gonçalves MA, Paiva T, Ramos E, Guilleminault C. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome, sleepiness, and quality of life. Chest 2004;125:2091–2096.

11. Yang EH, Hla KM, McHorney CA, Havighurst T et al. Sleep apnea and quality of life. Sleep 2000;23:535-541.

12. Daniels E, Martin A, King I, Smith E et al. Health-related quality of life in narcolepsy. J Sleep Res 2001;10:75-81.

13. Ferrer M, Vilagut G, Monasterio C, Montserrat JM et al. Medida del impacto de los trastornos del sueño: las versiones españolas del cuestionario del impacto funcional del sueño y de la escala de somnolencia de Epworth. Med Clin (Barc)1999;113:250-255.

14. Stavem K, Kjelsberg F, Ruud S. Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire. Quality Life Research 2004;13:541–549.

15. Izci B, Firat H, Ardic S, Kokturk O et al. Adaptation of functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) to Turkish population. Tuberk Toraks 2004;52:224-230.

16. Bliwise DL. Invited commentary: Cross-cultural Influences on sleepbroadening the environmental landscape. Am J Epidem 2008;168:1365- 1366.

17. Stranges S, Dorn JM, Shipley MJ, Kandala NB et al. Correlates of short and long sleep duration: A cross-cultural comparison between the United Kingdom and The United States. Am J Epidem 2008;168:1353-1363.

18. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 2002;24:61-63.

19. Reyes-Lagunes I. Las redes semánticas naturales modificadas para la construcción de instrumentos. Rev Psic Soc Per 1993;IX(1):83-99.

20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein YJ. Psychometric theory. Tercera edición. New York: McGraw Hill; 1994.

21. Reyes-Lagunes IL, García y Barragán LF. Procedimiento de validación psicométrica culturalmente relevante: un ejemplo. En: Rivera-Aragón S, Díaz-Loving R, Sánchez-Aragón R, Reyes-Lagunes I (eds.). La psicología social en México. Vol. XII. México: Asociación Mexicana de Psicología Social; 2008; pp. 625-636.

22. Wrigley C, Nauhaus JO. The matching of two sets factors. En: García- Cueto E. Congruencia factorial. Psicothema 1994;6: 465-468.