medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Sistema Mexicano de Investigación en Psicología (SMIP)

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Invest Psic 2011; 3 (1)

Glucose intake in rats: One bottle vs. two bottles

Martínez MAG, López-Espinoza A, Díaz RFJ, Franco PK, Cárdenas VA, Aguilera CVG, Valdés MEH, Magaña GCR, Santoyo TF

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 8-15
PDF size: 433.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective of this research consisted to compare sweetened solutions intake from a group of rats exposed to onebottle test against another group of rats exposed to two bottle testing, one bottle with sweetened solution and another with water. Animals were exposing to baseline of food and water and later were expose to an experimental procedure during nineteen days. Results showed that all subjects increase their liquid intake and decrease their food intake when they were expose to glucose in comparison whit their record of water and food intake during baseline. Animals exposed to two bottle test consumed more glucose in comparison to group exposed to one bottle test even differences were no significant. This suggests the possibility that the procedure used (availability of another bottle) help of sweetened drink intake.


REFERENCES

  1. Ackrooff, K., & Sclafani, A. (1997). Diabetic rats glucose-paired flavors over fructose-paired flavors. Appetite, 28, 73-83.

  2. Ackrooff, K., Manza, L., & Sclafani, A. (1993) the rat´s preference for sucrose, polycose and their mixtures. Appetite, 21, 69-80.

  3. Alsiöa, J., Pickeringa, C., Romanb, E., Hultingc, A., Lindbloma, J., & Schiötha, H. B. (2009). Motivation for sucrose in sated rats is predicted by low anxiety-like behavior. Neuroscience Letters 454, 193-197.

  4. Avena, N., Long, K., & Hoebel, B. G. (2005). Sugar-dependent rats show enhanced responding for sugar after abstinence: Evidence of a sugar deprivation effect. Physiology & Behavior, 84, 359-362.

  5. Barker, L. M., Best, M. R., & Domjan, M. (1977). Learning mechanisms in food selection. Texas: Baylor University

  6. Bello, N. T., & Hajnal, A. (2005). Male rats show an indifference- avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose. Nutrition Research, 25, 693-699.

  7. Capaldi, E.D., Campell, D.H., Sheffer, J.D., & Bradford, J.P. (1987). Conditioned flavor preferences based on delayed caloric consequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 150-155.

  8. Capaldi, E.D., Owens, J., & Palmer, K.A. (1994). Effects of food deprivation on learning and expresión of flavor preferentes condicioned by saccharin or sucrose. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 173-180.

  9. Colantuoni, C., Schwenker, J., McCarthy, J., Rada, P., Ladenheim, B., Cadet, J. L., Moran, T. H., & Hoebel, B. G. (2001) Excessive sugar intake alters binding to dopamine and mu-opioid receptors in the brain. Neuroreport, 12(16), 3549-3552.

  10. Ito, M., Takatsuru, S., & Saeki, D. (2000). Choice between constant and variable alternatives by rats: Effects of different reinforce amounts and energy budgets. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 79-92.

  11. Martínez, M, A., López-Espinoza, A., & Martínez, H. (2006). Efectos al modificar el contenido energético del agua sobre el peso corporal, consumo de agua, alimento y calorías en ratas. Universitas Psychologica, 5(2), 361-370.

  12. Martínez, M. A., López-Espinoza, A., Díaz, F. J., & Valdés, M. E. (2009). Consumo de soluciones endulzadas en ratas albinas: sabor vs calorías. Psicothema, 21(2), 196-203.

  13. Martínez, A. G., Díaz, F. J. Beltrán-Miranda, C. P., González, J. G., Munguía, L. M., & Venancio, D. (2010). Pre-exposure to sweeteners on glucose and sucralose consumption. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 36, Monográfico, 143-153.

  14. Mayorga, P., Medina, I. F., & Erazo, L. A. (2008). Elección y sustitución de estímulos entre el alcohol y el alimento en ratas: relación entre el incremento del costo de una alternativa y el cambio en la elección. Suma Psicológica, 15, 317-335.

  15. Mook, D. G. (1974). Saccharin preference in the rat: some unpalatable findings. Psychological Review, 81, 475-490.

  16. Montmayeur, J. P., & Matsunami, H. (2002). Receptors for bitter and sweet taste. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12 (4), 366–371.

  17. Petry, N., & Heyman, G. (1995). Behavioral economics of concurrent etanol-sucrose and sucrose reinforcement in the rat: Effects of altering variable-ratio requirements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 331-359.

  18. Prat-Larquemin, L., Oppert, J. M., Bellisle, F., & Guy-Grand, B. (2000). Sweet taste of aspartame and sucrose: effects on diet-induced thermogenesis. Appetite, 34, 245-251.

  19. Rachlin, H. (1989). Judment, decision, and choice. Nueva York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

  20. Rada, P., Avena, N., & Hoebel, B. G. (2005). Daily bingeing on sugar repeatedly releases dopamine in the accumbens shell. Neuroscience, 134, 737-744.

  21. Rogers, P. J., Carlyle, J. A., Hill, A. J., & Blundell, J. E. (1988). Uncoupling sweet taste and calories: comparision of the effects of glucose and three intense sweeteners on hunger and food intake. Physiology & Behavior, 43, 547-552.

  22. Sclafani, A. (1990). Nutritionally based learned flavor preferences. En E.D. Capaldi, y T.L. Powley (eds.). Taste, experience & feeding: development and learning. USA: American Psychological Association.

  23. Sclafani, A. (2005). Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing models: Two bottles test. Physiology & Behavior, 76, 633-644.

  24. Sclafani, A., & Clare, R. A. (2004). Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose. Chemical Senses, 29, 523-528.

  25. Smith, J. C., & Sclafani, A. (2002). Saccharin as a sugar surrogate revisited. Appetite, 38, 155-160.

  26. Wurtman, R. J., & Wurtman, J. J. (1995). Brain serotonin, carbohydrate- craving, obesity and depression. Obesity Research, 3 Suplemento 4, 477-480.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com